The whole point of this VoD is boxer vs idra. it coulda been a 6 pool vs 6 rax for all I (or anyone) should care. Stop critiquing. Not to mention this was a ladder game, so this could have been a new strat hes practicing. Or eating food, or maybe getting a blowjob from his GF. How you can imply the stuff you guys are implying from 1 ladder game is beyond stupidity.
BoxeR vs IdrA - Page 37
Forum Index > SC2 General |
mprs
Canada2933 Posts
The whole point of this VoD is boxer vs idra. it coulda been a 6 pool vs 6 rax for all I (or anyone) should care. Stop critiquing. Not to mention this was a ladder game, so this could have been a new strat hes practicing. Or eating food, or maybe getting a blowjob from his GF. How you can imply the stuff you guys are implying from 1 ladder game is beyond stupidity. | ||
Wings
United States999 Posts
On October 03 2010 04:26 mprs wrote: lol 80% of the people here missed the point. The whole point of this VoD is boxer vs idra. it coulda been a 6 pool vs 6 rax for all I (or anyone) should care. Stop critiquing. Not to mention this was a ladder game, so this could have been a new strat hes practicing. Or eating food, or maybe getting a blowjob from his GF. How you can imply the stuff you guys are implying from 1 ladder game is beyond stupidity. +1 User was warned for this post | ||
The Touch
United Kingdom667 Posts
| ||
dukethegold
Canada5645 Posts
On October 03 2010 04:09 VonLego wrote: Well Boxer of course is rank 2 in his division! Clearly it's... wait wuh? ROFL. I bet the Boxer got a good laugh out of it. The world works in pretty funny ways. | ||
Thegilaboy
United States2018 Posts
Everyone needs to watch this, especially new SC2 people who aren't aware of the legend | ||
ckw
United States1018 Posts
On October 03 2010 04:26 mprs wrote: lol 80% of the people here missed the point. The whole point of this VoD is boxer vs idra. it coulda been a 6 pool vs 6 rax for all I (or anyone) should care. Stop critiquing. Not to mention this was a ladder game, so this could have been a new strat hes practicing. Or eating food, or maybe getting a blowjob from his GF. How you can imply the stuff you guys are implying from 1 ladder game is beyond stupidity. Totally agree, even if he has a bunch of ladder games under his belt it means in no way that he is serious like he was in SCBW (yet). I guess I can see why people have the whole bad attitude towards what they saw because they expect Boxer to play as strong as in BW which no doubt he probably can and will but this is one game and the OP wasn't about "hey look at Boxer's play" it was "Look, Boxer IS actually playing!" Ty Artosis. ![]() | ||
Luxman
12 Posts
| ||
Raiznhell
Canada786 Posts
just curious why was this user warned for their post? is it wrong to just state +1 in agreement or? not being a dick im just genuinely curious so i dont make bad posts in the future. | ||
Celesti
69 Posts
On October 03 2010 07:53 Raiznhell wrote: just curious why was this user warned for their post? is it wrong to just state +1 in agreement or? not being a dick im just genuinely curious so i dont make bad posts in the future. The mods on TL are dicks. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
Thegilaboy
United States2018 Posts
On October 03 2010 07:53 Raiznhell wrote: just curious why was this user warned for their post? is it wrong to just state +1 in agreement or? not being a dick im just genuinely curious so i dont make bad posts in the future. Most likely because it is seen as a spam post, with no effort or content to it. If he agreed, he could elaborate a bit for the sake of discussion. It is not, as the poster above would indicate, because the TL mods are dicks... | ||
Celesti
69 Posts
On October 03 2010 07:58 Thegilaboy wrote: Most likely because it is seen as a spam post, with no effort or content to it. If he agreed, he could elaborate a bit for the sake of discussion. It is not, as the poster above would indicate, because the TL mods are dicks... What do you gain by sucking up on an internet forum? | ||
Thegilaboy
United States2018 Posts
On October 03 2010 07:59 Celesti wrote: What do you gain by sucking up on an internet forum? I do it for the ladies mostly ![]() | ||
babolatt
Canada312 Posts
On October 03 2010 03:59 qtpie wrote: unfair comparison, I don't need to be a profession movie critique to know that a movie sucks, or a food critique to know bad food tastes bad. . It's far worse than that. It's like saying you can't critique a movie because you aren't good at MAKING movies. You don't need to be an expert player to make reasonable observations about expert players. You need to have knowledge of the game, and have watched a lot of games. There are lots of people out there who watch a ton of starcraft and still aren't expert players, but have just as much, or more knowledge of the game than some players. The game was pretty good. It was a bit annoying to watch because Artosis commented more on how much he loved boxer than what was going on in the game. We also all know that if this had been another player, nobody would be saying "this is the best game ever omg". | ||
LionKingMax
Canada10 Posts
On October 01 2010 07:54 Artosis wrote:Rumor has it he wants to switch to SC2. orgasm. Boxer was the first BW pro I've discovered when I got interested into competitive play some years ago. I would really enjoy seeing him coming back. | ||
davis.of.km
United States23 Posts
On October 01 2010 09:18 Phos wrote: whats with the retarded names from the koreans? manofoneway? team scv life? is there a deeper meaning to this i dont get? I personally thought manofoneway was a fucking awesome name to be quite honest. | ||
Treadmill
Canada2833 Posts
http://kr.battle.net/sc2/ko/blog/390545 Ranked #8 on the Korean ladder as of September 28? Huh. | ||
stork4ever
United States1036 Posts
| ||
Biochemist
United States1008 Posts
On October 03 2010 07:53 Raiznhell wrote: just curious why was this user warned for their post? is it wrong to just state +1 in agreement or? not being a dick im just genuinely curious so i dont make bad posts in the future. TL expects posters to put a little bit of effort into their posts. Nobody wants to constantly scroll through a bunch of "+1" and "lol" posts to find stuff worth reading. If you're conscious AT ALL about not making bad posts, you probably have nothing to worry about. | ||
Raevin
246 Posts
just curious why was this user warned for their post? is it wrong to just state +1 in agreement or? not being a dick im just genuinely curious so i dont make bad posts in the future. Why is it so difficult to understand? What does "+1" add to anything? What does it even imply? That he supports his point of view? Why not write that instead of a number or even expand on it? Or if he has nothing to add just nod IRL and dont post anything? Imagine if every member on these forums did that +1 everytime they agreed to a post? Imagine how it would actually look, you would have to scroll through all that garbage just to find someone who posted something of any merit. | ||
Madder
Australia427 Posts
On October 03 2010 05:09 dukethegold wrote: ROFL. I bet the Boxer got a good laugh out of it. The world works in pretty funny ways. Man, I bet it'd be awkward/hilarious if they ever met in a ladder match (they probably even have). | ||
| ||