EPTGOM stream quality differences - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
knyttym
United States5797 Posts
On September 04 2010 02:49 Vaporized wrote: so the idra match is on at 3am pst? somebody clear this up for me please. yes | ||
|
holy_war
United States3590 Posts
| ||
|
Noxie
United States2227 Posts
| ||
|
vyyye
Sweden3917 Posts
On September 04 2010 00:16 telamascope wrote: I'm not complaining. I'm happy that the free stream. Yup this, and considering thechange I've been thinking about just buying the premium stream. I'm liking Gom quite a bit. | ||
|
Nu11
Canada167 Posts
| ||
|
Shika
Sweden1711 Posts
I will buy the premium stream 2nd day and onwards if the 1st went well with no lag. | ||
|
Tanatos
United States381 Posts
| ||
|
Full.tilt
United Kingdom1709 Posts
On September 04 2010 02:33 Roffles wrote: a shitty stream is better than no stream. 'nuff said. | ||
|
pointy stick
Germany19 Posts
| ||
|
universalwill
United States654 Posts
| ||
|
CScythe
Canada810 Posts
| ||
|
Jameser
Sweden951 Posts
 | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On September 04 2010 02:36 Dionyseus wrote: 500k SC2 looks far better than 3000k BW imo. Okay. Keep telling yourself that. | ||
|
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
| ||
|
Rokk
United States425 Posts
On September 04 2010 02:34 Alou wrote: This is better than nothing or paying the $50. Anyone who wants better should pay for the quality boost. I'm fine with this. And this is why marketing strategies work. Believe what you want about their intentions, just from reading the recent threads on TL, it's apparent that if they did plan this marketing strategy, it was wildly successful. The free stream's quality is awful. The paid stream's quality isn't bad but is pretty awful for having to pay $20 to see it. I would have expected the free stream to be around "High" quality and the paid stream to be HD quality. | ||
|
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On September 04 2010 01:26 Manaldski wrote: It's simple, GomTV understands that it will be difficulty to stream lagless from Korea (be it in low or high quality) so they rented a US server to be able to broadcast in Low/High quality to the rest of the world. By default the network settings of the OSes are not suitable for high-speed transfers over a single session over high-latency links, that's why you cant just stream HD-video off your US West Coast server because it will be laggy for most of the people outside America, who haven't tuned their network settings. To broadcast in HD (you will probably need 3-4Mbit bitrate for the video to look good) worldwide without lag you will need a CDN, which costs money. TheGunrun demonstrated the "high" stream quality [500k] and then showed his own one for GLHF.tv [1.4M] and it was a big and visible difference. They are doing FREE streams already in his quality and I think he said he would be willing to stream it if he was asked, so go figure why I think that some people simply want to make money and simply give excuses for putting out a crappy free stream and make people pay for "high" quality. We already had some pretty big tournaments with free super high quality streams during the beta and I doubt the number of viewers will be much bigger than that and it worked and did not require any special super upload streamer. | ||
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
On September 04 2010 02:36 Dionyseus wrote: 500k SC2 looks far better than 3000k BW imo. In terms of clarity, no. Maybe if you think shiny things make it look better then okay. I don't even think you've seen a 3000k BW stream tbh. | ||
|
RifleCow
Canada637 Posts
| ||
|
Lennon
United Kingdom2275 Posts
GomTV has always given me problems. | ||
| ||
