EPTI'm also top 2 percentage in the world in gold league NA.
http://sc2ranks.com/us/410816/TheTemplar
If it looks normal to you, I completely give up on my Internet on my iPhone.
SC2 Ranks (site) - Page 69
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
I'm also top 2 percentage in the world in gold league NA. http://sc2ranks.com/us/410816/TheTemplar If it looks normal to you, I completely give up on my Internet on my iPhone. | ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
On March 07 2012 07:29 TehTemplar wrote: Apparently I have both a 100% win percentage this season and no games since early january...? I'm also top 2 percentage in the world in gold league NA. http://sc2ranks.com/us/410816/TheTemplar If it looks normal to you, I completely give up on my Internet on my iPhone. win percentage is always 100 % for leagues lower than master, because battle.net don't keep track of your losses, only wins. Check out any random non-master profile, you'll allways see 100% win rate | ||
|
triforks
United States370 Posts
 | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On March 07 2012 07:32 oGoZenob wrote: win percentage is always 100 % for leagues lower than master, because battle.net don't keep track of your losses, only wins. Check out any random non-master profile, you'll allways see 100% win rate Perfectly normal that im top 2% overall while in gold, eh? | ||
|
TigerKarl
1757 Posts
On March 07 2012 08:35 TehTemplar wrote: Perfectly normal that im top 2% overall while in gold, eh? I don't see where you would get that information on your sc2 ranks profile page. I guess you're misinterpreting something, same as with your 100% win ratio. | ||
|
TimoS1703
Germany250 Posts
On March 07 2012 08:35 TehTemplar wrote: Perfectly normal that im top 2% overall while in gold, eh? you belong to top 2% off the gold league worldwide, thats all | ||
|
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
On March 07 2012 08:35 TehTemplar wrote: Perfectly normal that im top 2% overall while in gold, eh? Good thing you posted before thinking about it! Now everyone knows! | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On March 07 2012 08:40 TimoS1703 wrote: you belong to top 2% off the gold league worldwide, thats all Thanks for clarifying.  Good thing you posted before thinking about it! Now everyone knows! Yes, it's not as if I've never used that website before or anything. | ||
|
DarKcS
Australia1237 Posts
| ||
|
Conti
Germany2516 Posts
Of course, it would be even more useful to those of us who can't speak Korean. | ||
|
Not_That
287 Posts
The 1v1 division page for my character on sc2ranks: http://sc2ranks.com/div/255990/division-felanis-theta lists the division_id as 255990. This is the same number I get when using the API. However on b.net website my 1v1 division page: http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2033279/1/NotThat/ladder/83027#current-rank gives my division number as 83027. Would it be possible for sc2ranks to use same numbering for the various divisions as they are numbered on b.net website? The reason I ask this is because I am working on a script that accesses the b.net division page for each player in a specific custom division in order to grab the player's unspent bonus pool value. As things are the script has to open each player's main profile page using the bnet_id and name of each player in the division which are available through sc2ranks API, and then find out what is the division number on b.net website to open that. By having sc2ranks keep same division_id as b.net's division numbers (or perhaps available through an API query?) it would cut the number of queries required to b.net website in half by anyone who wishes to use a similar script. I imagine you have good reason to having different division numbering than b.net uses, but I figured I'll make a suggestion in case this is practical thing to implement. | ||
|
Shadowed
United States679 Posts
| ||
|
Gl!tch
United States573 Posts
Is it just my profile is bugged, http://www.sc2ranks.com/team/3896170 or is this everywhere? | ||
|
Not_That
287 Posts
On April 02 2012 03:43 Shadowed wrote: It uses its internal ids for divisions and doesn't store the battle.net ones on that type of API request. So it's not something that's really sane for me to add, sorry. I understand, NP. Just keep in mind if you ever do consider implementing this, the beginning of a season would be an ideal time since all the divisions are created from fresh. Thanks for making sc2ranks. =) | ||
|
ttfdrevil
United States16 Posts
Would it be possible to have the stats page track the final seasons as opposed to the patch dates? As the patches haven't been following the season dates it can be hard to track player changes over time (I think season 5 stats are gone and replaced with season 6 as there hasn't been a recent path). Just a thought. I was thinking that maybe a simple snapshot could be taken at the end of the season and reported. Thanks for the fun tool! | ||
|
RaiderRob
Netherlands377 Posts
On April 03 2012 04:58 ttfdrevil wrote: Shadow, Would it be possible to have the stats page track the final seasons as opposed to the patch dates? As the patches haven't been following the season dates it can be hard to track player changes over time (I think season 5 stats are gone and replaced with season 6 as there hasn't been a recent path). Just a thought. I was thinking that maybe a simple snapshot could be taken at the end of the season and reported. Thanks for the fun tool! I came here just to ask for this. I would really like to see how player numbers change per season and if the shorter seasons do in fact increase the amount of players as Blizzard intended. And I really like how I can see how well I'm doing for my league, it's kinda fun when you're top 1% of your league and gives me something to aim for besides promotion. | ||
|
pycho
Paraguay372 Posts
| ||
|
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
http://sc2ranks.com/stats/league/eu/1/all | ||
|
Sabre
United Kingdom1086 Posts
| ||
|
MyRevenge
France12 Posts
http://sc2ranks.com/ranks/eu/master/1/all/points/0/4 The number at the end is related to the activity. Since the reset was 5 days ago, it's easy to ignore old statistics this way. | ||
| ||
