• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:36
CEST 07:36
KST 14:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror4[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202613Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)78Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)
Tourneys
RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Grand Finals
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble
Brood War
General
Sagi.gg Launcher Released Fantasy returning? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion GG Lan Fest Sofia, Bulgaria [this November]
Tourneys
[ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Semifinal A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10124 users

Why Zerg is Good - Page 17

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 30 Next All
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
July 23 2010 01:51 GMT
#321
Basically, this thread is pointless, since Gold/Plat players complaining about how hard and therefore imba Zerg is is about as pointless as C/D terrans in BW saying Terran is impossible to win with.

If IdrA and Dimaga don't get to the semis of the KotB tournament, then there will definitely be a case that zerg is underpowered, as those are two very good players who can use any race to their full power. Complaints from low-level players should not factor into balance decisions at all though.
Ruthless
Profile Joined August 2008
United States492 Posts
July 23 2010 01:52 GMT
#322
On July 23 2010 10:09 jalstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 10:07 gerundium wrote:
On July 23 2010 09:45 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 08:56 Antpile wrote:
If zerg requires more focus and apm to compete than the other two races, then they are by definition underpowered.


Terran requires more focus and APM to compete than the other two races in Brood War, and they've been more successful than Protoss or Zerg by far.

Hard to play does not equal imbalanced, people! Geez.


Yes it does, come on think about this for more then 2 seconds. If players of equal skill face Terran wins (more then 50%) because zerg is harder. That is very definition of imbalance, that an equal matchup does not end in 50/50 due to some factor.




Do you have stats that it doesn't end 50/50?

The highest level tourney we've had so far, the 17173 world cup or whatever, had 3 zergs in the semis and one Terran, ZvZ finals. No one gives a shit that low level zergs lose a lot of games. Pros are doing fine with Zerg and that's that.



Tournament results from several patches ago are not relevant.
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
July 23 2010 01:54 GMT
#323
On July 23 2010 10:52 Ruthless wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 10:09 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:07 gerundium wrote:
On July 23 2010 09:45 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 08:56 Antpile wrote:
If zerg requires more focus and apm to compete than the other two races, then they are by definition underpowered.


Terran requires more focus and APM to compete than the other two races in Brood War, and they've been more successful than Protoss or Zerg by far.

Hard to play does not equal imbalanced, people! Geez.


Yes it does, come on think about this for more then 2 seconds. If players of equal skill face Terran wins (more then 50%) because zerg is harder. That is very definition of imbalance, that an equal matchup does not end in 50/50 due to some factor.




Do you have stats that it doesn't end 50/50?

The highest level tourney we've had so far, the 17173 world cup or whatever, had 3 zergs in the semis and one Terran, ZvZ finals. No one gives a shit that low level zergs lose a lot of games. Pros are doing fine with Zerg and that's that.



Tournament results from several patches ago are not relevant.


They absolutely are. Zerg has not been completely revamped since then, so arguments that Zerg needs a complete revamp to be competitive are pointless.
RxN
Profile Joined May 2010
United States255 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-23 02:08:59
July 23 2010 02:08 GMT
#324
On July 23 2010 10:54 jalstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 10:52 Ruthless wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:09 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:07 gerundium wrote:
On July 23 2010 09:45 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 08:56 Antpile wrote:
If zerg requires more focus and apm to compete than the other two races, then they are by definition underpowered.


Terran requires more focus and APM to compete than the other two races in Brood War, and they've been more successful than Protoss or Zerg by far.

Hard to play does not equal imbalanced, people! Geez.


Yes it does, come on think about this for more then 2 seconds. If players of equal skill face Terran wins (more then 50%) because zerg is harder. That is very definition of imbalance, that an equal matchup does not end in 50/50 due to some factor.




Do you have stats that it doesn't end 50/50?

The highest level tourney we've had so far, the 17173 world cup or whatever, had 3 zergs in the semis and one Terran, ZvZ finals. No one gives a shit that low level zergs lose a lot of games. Pros are doing fine with Zerg and that's that.



Tournament results from several patches ago are not relevant.


They absolutely are. Zerg has not been completely revamped since then, so arguments that Zerg needs a complete revamp to be competitive are pointless.


You're a fool. It's not only what has changed for zerg, but what has changed with terran and protoss as well.
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
July 23 2010 02:15 GMT
#325
On July 23 2010 11:08 RxN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 10:54 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:52 Ruthless wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:09 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:07 gerundium wrote:
On July 23 2010 09:45 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 08:56 Antpile wrote:
If zerg requires more focus and apm to compete than the other two races, then they are by definition underpowered.


Terran requires more focus and APM to compete than the other two races in Brood War, and they've been more successful than Protoss or Zerg by far.

Hard to play does not equal imbalanced, people! Geez.


Yes it does, come on think about this for more then 2 seconds. If players of equal skill face Terran wins (more then 50%) because zerg is harder. That is very definition of imbalance, that an equal matchup does not end in 50/50 due to some factor.




Do you have stats that it doesn't end 50/50?

The highest level tourney we've had so far, the 17173 world cup or whatever, had 3 zergs in the semis and one Terran, ZvZ finals. No one gives a shit that low level zergs lose a lot of games. Pros are doing fine with Zerg and that's that.



Tournament results from several patches ago are not relevant.


They absolutely are. Zerg has not been completely revamped since then, so arguments that Zerg needs a complete revamp to be competitive are pointless.


You're a fool. It's not only what has changed for zerg, but what has changed with terran and protoss as well.


The changes made have been relatively small compared to even the patch changes at the beginning of beta. Besides, people were saying "mech is unstoppable" when the 17173 world cup was going on as well.
Gunman_csz
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United Arab Emirates492 Posts
July 23 2010 02:17 GMT
#326
On July 23 2010 10:47 jalstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 10:42 Gunman_csz wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:09 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:07 gerundium wrote:
On July 23 2010 09:45 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 08:56 Antpile wrote:
If zerg requires more focus and apm to compete than the other two races, then they are by definition underpowered.


Terran requires more focus and APM to compete than the other two races in Brood War, and they've been more successful than Protoss or Zerg by far.

Hard to play does not equal imbalanced, people! Geez.


Yes it does, come on think about this for more then 2 seconds. If players of equal skill face Terran wins (more then 50%) because zerg is harder. That is very definition of imbalance, that an equal matchup does not end in 50/50 due to some factor.




Do you have stats that it doesn't end 50/50?

The highest level tourney we've had so far, the 17173 world cup or whatever, had 3 zergs in the semis and one Terran, ZvZ finals. No one gives a shit that low level zergs lose a lot of games. Pros are doing fine with Zerg and that's that.


http://sc2.vacau.com/sc2/GlobalRanks.php

Use your brain for once, tired of reading your idiotic posts. Do you even think before you type? Since the 17173 there has been numerous changes to both races in question. Zergs race has been getting nerfs (Roach/infestor) while terran has been constantly buffs.


You think Diamond level right now is anywhere near the skill cap? Again, Terran is a hard race in BW, and D/C terrans fail hard on iccup but the top Terran pros can win tons of games.

Again, you have shown no evidence that Zerg's situation in SC2 is any different from Terran's in SC1. Needing more APM and skill to play does not mean worse.


Keep on arguing for the sake of arguing/trolling.

LET me explain this to you in simple terms. The only and only reasons Terran seems hard to those D/C players is because of the Terran mechanics (unit production, spells, unit control, etc). Now that is a freaking polar opposite to the Zerg race in SC2. Because A. Zergs don't have many spell casters. B. Unity product is simplified (MBS), and unit control is way easier.

Mechanics is what made Terran hard! Mechanics is extremely simplified in sc2! thus your argument is flawed.

So please don't don't go on comparing two entirely different things on two very different games.
Began Starcraft journey on 5th May 2009
LaLuSh
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden2358 Posts
July 23 2010 02:17 GMT
#327
On July 23 2010 11:08 RxN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 10:54 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:52 Ruthless wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:09 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:07 gerundium wrote:
On July 23 2010 09:45 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 08:56 Antpile wrote:
If zerg requires more focus and apm to compete than the other two races, then they are by definition underpowered.


Terran requires more focus and APM to compete than the other two races in Brood War, and they've been more successful than Protoss or Zerg by far.

Hard to play does not equal imbalanced, people! Geez.


Yes it does, come on think about this for more then 2 seconds. If players of equal skill face Terran wins (more then 50%) because zerg is harder. That is very definition of imbalance, that an equal matchup does not end in 50/50 due to some factor.




Do you have stats that it doesn't end 50/50?

The highest level tourney we've had so far, the 17173 world cup or whatever, had 3 zergs in the semis and one Terran, ZvZ finals. No one gives a shit that low level zergs lose a lot of games. Pros are doing fine with Zerg and that's that.



Tournament results from several patches ago are not relevant.


They absolutely are. Zerg has not been completely revamped since then, so arguments that Zerg needs a complete revamp to be competitive are pointless.


You're a fool. It's not only what has changed for zerg, but what has changed with terran and protoss as well.


Also what has changed with knowledge of the game and strategies.

Terran were very hard to get into at the start of the beta because of their diverse tech tree. Zerg were very straight forward in comparison (at the start of the beta), as you'd be able to mass units because terran hadn't developed strategies and knowledge of the tech tree.

As terrans learned the most efficient way of playing, they grew increasingly harder to deal with for zerg. They've basically got an infinite amount of openings to choose from. Because of their diversity I'd argue they're still the race with the most unexplored potential.

I just don't see zerg finding any ways of putting pressure on a terran before 8-9 minutes into the game anytime soon.
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
July 23 2010 02:22 GMT
#328
On July 23 2010 11:17 Gunman_csz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 10:47 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:42 Gunman_csz wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:09 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:07 gerundium wrote:
On July 23 2010 09:45 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 08:56 Antpile wrote:
If zerg requires more focus and apm to compete than the other two races, then they are by definition underpowered.


Terran requires more focus and APM to compete than the other two races in Brood War, and they've been more successful than Protoss or Zerg by far.

Hard to play does not equal imbalanced, people! Geez.


Yes it does, come on think about this for more then 2 seconds. If players of equal skill face Terran wins (more then 50%) because zerg is harder. That is very definition of imbalance, that an equal matchup does not end in 50/50 due to some factor.




Do you have stats that it doesn't end 50/50?

The highest level tourney we've had so far, the 17173 world cup or whatever, had 3 zergs in the semis and one Terran, ZvZ finals. No one gives a shit that low level zergs lose a lot of games. Pros are doing fine with Zerg and that's that.


http://sc2.vacau.com/sc2/GlobalRanks.php

Use your brain for once, tired of reading your idiotic posts. Do you even think before you type? Since the 17173 there has been numerous changes to both races in question. Zergs race has been getting nerfs (Roach/infestor) while terran has been constantly buffs.


You think Diamond level right now is anywhere near the skill cap? Again, Terran is a hard race in BW, and D/C terrans fail hard on iccup but the top Terran pros can win tons of games.

Again, you have shown no evidence that Zerg's situation in SC2 is any different from Terran's in SC1. Needing more APM and skill to play does not mean worse.


Keep on arguing for the sake of arguing/trolling.

LET me explain this to you in simple terms. The only and only reasons Terran seems hard to those D/C players is because of the Terran mechanics (unit production, spells, unit control, etc). Now that is a freaking polar opposite to the Zerg race in SC2. Because A. Zergs don't have many spell casters. B. Unity product is simplified (MBS), and unit control is way easier.

Mechanics is what made Terran hard! Mechanics is extremely simplified in sc2! thus your argument is flawed.

So please don't don't go on comparing two entirely different things on two very different games.


Microing muta/baneling/speedling properly is much harder than microing any unit combination with terran or protoss. With Terran and Protoss I could do reasonably well with massing units and pressing 1a, with Zerg it's impossible to win like that. Also macroing is much less mindless with Zerg since you need to use both creep tumors and larva inject. So yes, there are mechanics in SC2. I can't believe so much time has passed and people are still saying there aren't.
Headshot
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1656 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-23 02:26:03
July 23 2010 02:24 GMT
#329
On July 23 2010 11:17 LaLuSh wrote:
I just don't see zerg finding any ways of putting pressure on a terran before 8-9 minutes into the game anytime soon.

At least until we see a new map pool that doesn't favor the use of ramps and small chokes.
-
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
July 23 2010 02:28 GMT
#330
On July 23 2010 11:24 Headshot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 11:17 LaLuSh wrote:
I just don't see zerg finding any ways of putting pressure on a terran before 8-9 minutes into the game anytime soon.

At least until we see a new map pool that doesn't favor the use of ramps and small chokes.


The maps are imba? That's ridiculous, everyone knows mech is imba! Remove siege tanks!
Gunman_csz
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United Arab Emirates492 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-23 02:45:36
July 23 2010 02:39 GMT
#331
On July 23 2010 11:22 jalstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 11:17 Gunman_csz wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:47 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:42 Gunman_csz wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:09 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 10:07 gerundium wrote:
On July 23 2010 09:45 jalstar wrote:
On July 23 2010 08:56 Antpile wrote:
If zerg requires more focus and apm to compete than the other two races, then they are by definition underpowered.


Terran requires more focus and APM to compete than the other two races in Brood War, and they've been more successful than Protoss or Zerg by far.

Hard to play does not equal imbalanced, people! Geez.


Yes it does, come on think about this for more then 2 seconds. If players of equal skill face Terran wins (more then 50%) because zerg is harder. That is very definition of imbalance, that an equal matchup does not end in 50/50 due to some factor.




Do you have stats that it doesn't end 50/50?

The highest level tourney we've had so far, the 17173 world cup or whatever, had 3 zergs in the semis and one Terran, ZvZ finals. No one gives a shit that low level zergs lose a lot of games. Pros are doing fine with Zerg and that's that.


http://sc2.vacau.com/sc2/GlobalRanks.php

Use your brain for once, tired of reading your idiotic posts. Do you even think before you type? Since the 17173 there has been numerous changes to both races in question. Zergs race has been getting nerfs (Roach/infestor) while terran has been constantly buffs.


You think Diamond level right now is anywhere near the skill cap? Again, Terran is a hard race in BW, and D/C terrans fail hard on iccup but the top Terran pros can win tons of games.

Again, you have shown no evidence that Zerg's situation in SC2 is any different from Terran's in SC1. Needing more APM and skill to play does not mean worse.


Keep on arguing for the sake of arguing/trolling.

LET me explain this to you in simple terms. The only and only reasons Terran seems hard to those D/C players is because of the Terran mechanics (unit production, spells, unit control, etc). Now that is a freaking polar opposite to the Zerg race in SC2. Because A. Zergs don't have many spell casters. B. Unity product is simplified (MBS), and unit control is way easier.

Mechanics is what made Terran hard! Mechanics is extremely simplified in sc2! thus your argument is flawed.

So please don't don't go on comparing two entirely different things on two very different games.


Microing muta/baneling/speedling properly is much harder than microing any unit combination with terran or protoss. With Terran and Protoss I could do reasonably well with massing units and pressing 1a, with Zerg it's impossible to win like that. Also macroing is much less mindless with Zerg since you need to use both creep tumors and larva inject. So yes, there are mechanics in SC2. I can't believe so much time has passed and people are still saying there aren't.


Are we still arguing this. You are putting words in my mouth. I SAID mechanics is simplified not that it does not exist. And if you think managing low energy is hard then it is pointless talking to you.

ARE you seriously saying the that MBS and unlimited unit selection doesn't make things simpler in terms of mechanics?

LET me ask you this, Why is it if not for mechanics that Terran is hard for low level?

Keep on posting (cough troll)
Began Starcraft journey on 5th May 2009
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19392 Posts
July 23 2010 02:45 GMT
#332
Zerg is BOSS.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
SpaceYeti
Profile Joined June 2010
United States723 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-23 03:04:01
July 23 2010 02:56 GMT
#333
On a side note, I was just browsing through the screenshots on the new battle.net sc2 site, and I realized that nearly every scene featuring zerg show them in a bad situation. What's the deal?

Coincidence?

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/media/screenshots

EDIT: Kept looking, and nm. They get better deeper in the stack. :D
Behavior is a function of its consequences.
vileChAnCe
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada525 Posts
July 23 2010 03:04 GMT
#334
We need a lock up in here this thread got derailed the original post is good but people are just bashing each other now
Day[9] i've broken 6 mice, 5 keyboards, 3 pairs of headphones, and a mousepad, all from raging after starcraft losing streaks
Fizbin
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada202 Posts
July 23 2010 03:08 GMT
#335
zerg ISNT good
just the tip
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
July 23 2010 03:53 GMT
#336
+ Show Spoiler +
qxc just beat Dimaga so that's a sign something is definitely wrong with TvZ


Are we still arguing this. You are putting words in my mouth. I SAID mechanics is simplified not that it does not exist. And if you think managing low energy is hard then it is pointless talking to you.

ARE you seriously saying the that MBS and unlimited unit selection doesn't make things simpler in terms of mechanics?


Zerg mechanics are still harder than Terran and Protoss. You're not thinking relatively.
starcat
Profile Joined July 2010
66 Posts
July 23 2010 04:01 GMT
#337
On July 23 2010 12:53 jalstar wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
qxc just beat Dimaga so that's a sign something is definitely wrong with TvZ


Show nested quote +
Are we still arguing this. You are putting words in my mouth. I SAID mechanics is simplified not that it does not exist. And if you think managing low energy is hard then it is pointless talking to you.

ARE you seriously saying the that MBS and unlimited unit selection doesn't make things simpler in terms of mechanics?


Zerg mechanics are still harder than Terran and Protoss. You're not thinking relatively.


People are too dumb to realize these things. They live in their own little world, and seem to play a different sc2 than the rest of us.
vileChAnCe
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada525 Posts
July 23 2010 04:10 GMT
#338
On July 23 2010 13:01 starcat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2010 12:53 jalstar wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
qxc just beat Dimaga so that's a sign something is definitely wrong with TvZ


Are we still arguing this. You are putting words in my mouth. I SAID mechanics is simplified not that it does not exist. And if you think managing low energy is hard then it is pointless talking to you.

ARE you seriously saying the that MBS and unlimited unit selection doesn't make things simpler in terms of mechanics?


Zerg mechanics are still harder than Terran and Protoss. You're not thinking relatively.


People are too dumb to realize these things. They live in their own little world, and seem to play a different sc2 than the rest of us.



Calm down your being hypocritical at this point, any time you feel someone is dumb for not feeling the same way you do your living in your own little world buddy. Hate to break it to you in such a fashion but you need to let it go, whether the race feels broken to you or not isn't going to change someone elses personal experience.
Day[9] i've broken 6 mice, 5 keyboards, 3 pairs of headphones, and a mousepad, all from raging after starcraft losing streaks
Gunman_csz
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United Arab Emirates492 Posts
July 23 2010 04:14 GMT
#339
On July 23 2010 12:53 jalstar wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
qxc just beat Dimaga so that's a sign something is definitely wrong with TvZ


Show nested quote +
Are we still arguing this. You are putting words in my mouth. I SAID mechanics is simplified not that it does not exist. And if you think managing low energy is hard then it is pointless talking to you.

ARE you seriously saying the that MBS and unlimited unit selection doesn't make things simpler in terms of mechanics?


Zerg mechanics are still harder than Terran and Protoss. You're not thinking relatively.


Are you even capable of understanding an argument?

It doesn't matter if Zerg mechanics are relatively harder compared to Protoss/Terran in SC2 (debatle), The point is that it is still no where near as demanding as the pure mechanics/limitations of SC1. This explains why Terran had to master the fundamentally hard mechanics to compete with their counterparts at the lower level ICCUP.

So you are saying all these people are complaining because they can't manage their queen energy? or spew lava? Do you even think before you type?

Like I have already pointed out you can't compare two inherit opposite race in two entirely different games.

Keep on trolling.
Began Starcraft journey on 5th May 2009
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-23 04:26:11
July 23 2010 04:24 GMT
#340
It doesn't matter if Zerg mechanics are relatively harder compared to Protoss/Terran in SC2 (debatle


Yes it does that's the whole point. The learning curve is harder so Zergs aren't as good right now. Again, a recent result has convinced me that ZvT does need to be tweaked in favor of Z, but Zerg mechanics are definitely harder.

Macro: with P or T you can group all your CCs/nexuses together and there's your macro mechanic. With Z you have double the macro mechanics if you want to have additional larva at each hatchery and creep all over the map.

Micro: with P or T you can do ok with using 1a, with Z you need to flank, split banelings, control mutas, burrow roaches, micro infestors (and very few zergs have been doing all those things). There's no ball of death for Zerg, not even close.

Also, I don't understand why you're trying to derail this thread into a flamewar.

So you are saying all these people are complaining because they can't manage their queen energy? or spew lava? Do you even think before you type?


I've only seen Idra and TLO cover the map with creep tumors while getting maximum larva. And so many zergs have been using a 1a blob of death it's not even funny.
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 30 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
08:00
QMC Community Tournament 1
Liquipedia
OSC
07:15
Masters Cup #151 Group C
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 183
Nina 113
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 3843
Sharp 415
Mong 90
Dewaltoss 85
Icarus 9
Noble 9
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm191
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King216
Other Games
summit1g7069
WinterStarcraft592
C9.Mang0276
Sick139
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 38
• StrangeGG 25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki23
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2256
League of Legends
• Lourlo1091
• Stunt384
Other Games
• Shiphtur467
Upcoming Events
OSC
17h 24m
Big Brain Bouts
1d 4h
Rex vs INexorable
GgMaChine vs HeRoMaRinE
Reynor vs herO
AI Arena Tournament
1d 11h
BSL: Ladder Tournament
1d 13h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Patches Events
2 days
BSL Open Qualifier
2 days
BSL Open Qualifier
2 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSB
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
HCC Season 3
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.