EPTGOM TV/Blizzard Sign Exclusive Broadcast Agreement - Page 11
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
koppik
United States676 Posts
| ||
|
CyberPitz
United States428 Posts
Would you listen to yourself? "OMG BLIZZARD IS SO HORRIBLE FOR WANTING TO UPHOLD THEIR INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS AS THE COMPANY THAT CREATED THE GAME!" I can't even fathom how you believe you have any sort of an argument to stand on. | ||
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
On May 27 2010 12:54 Milkis wrote: Of course the game was balanced by luck. Just look at SC2, THIS IS THE BLIZZARD BALANCE TEAM PRETENDING TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING. They do not. SC just happened to be balanced. SC1 was actually balanced by the mapmakers. | ||
Milkis
5003 Posts
On May 27 2010 12:59 Spawkuring wrote: You really need to stop listening to the little voices in your head. Blizzard, Kespa, the pro-gamers, and the community all contributed towards making BW successful. Blizzard is not taking credit, but simply taking it in another direction. Whether that direction is good remains to be seen, but no need to get so hysterical about it. Yup, because I'm just crazy. Blizzard is 100% taking credit. They want 100% control, that is all they want. 100% control is always bad, no matter what. It means that, we're 100% at the mercy of Blizzard, it means that if we disagree with Blizzard, there is nothing we can do about it. The only thing Blizzard has told us about eSports is in their pathetic attempts to contract with KesPA and Battle.net 2.0. Great signals. I don't have any hope for E-Sports at the moment. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49904 Posts
On May 27 2010 12:58 Milkis wrote: Yeah how many of those 3 games have successful eSports leagues. Oh. Wait. Blizzard does not give a fuck about eSports. They care about milking. All of you are nothing but numbers and $$$$ to Blizzard. If you need any evidence, just look at battle.net 2.0 Blizzard can't run eSports for nuts,I can agree with that,but that is also the reason they're making deals with KeSPA(who refused) and GOMTV(who accepted) and these people know how to run eSports quite well. | ||
|
G3nXsiS
United States656 Posts
| ||
|
Comeh
United States18918 Posts
(fingers crossed) | ||
|
Smu
Serbia164 Posts
| ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49904 Posts
but I have faith things will work out fine. | ||
|
Von
United States363 Posts
No brainer. Sounds like good news to me. /end 2000 page complicated thread | ||
|
Weasel-
Canada1556 Posts
| ||
rotinegg
United States1719 Posts
| ||
|
holy_war
United States3590 Posts
| ||
|
Talic_Zealot
688 Posts
| ||
|
Wolfsinus
United States22 Posts
| ||
|
PanzerDragoon
United States822 Posts
On May 27 2010 12:54 Milkis wrote: There's a difference between creating it and then taking credit. It's like Blizzard had a bastard child, whom they abandoned after milking him for 5 years. Koreans picked them up, fed and nurtured it so the child became successful. Then Blizzard comes in and says "lol that's cause it's my genes. It has nothing to do with anything else" It is pure, unadulterated arrogance. There is no other words I can say other than that (other than the fact that I"m probably going to write some ridiculous essay about this soon). Of course the game was balanced by luck. Just look at SC2, THIS IS THE BLIZZARD BALANCE TEAM PRETENDING TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING. They do not. SC just happened to be balanced. Games pretty balanced for being in beta for like 3 months, bro. Take a goddamn chill pill. | ||
|
lokiM
United States3407 Posts
| ||
|
PanzerDragoon
United States822 Posts
On May 27 2010 12:58 Milkis wrote: Yeah how many of those 3 games have successful eSports leagues. Oh. Wait. Blizzard does not give a fuck about eSports. They care about milking. All of you are nothing but numbers and $$$$ to Blizzard. If you need any evidence, just look at battle.net 2.0 WC3 was actually pretty successful until crooked mapmakers at MBC rigged maps in favor of Orc.... pretty sure your precious Koreans pretty much destroyed that game, not Blizzard. | ||
|
PanzerDragoon
United States822 Posts
On May 27 2010 13:01 QibingZero wrote: Memories? Are you clueless and don't realize that thousands of people on this site (and many, many more in Korea) still enjoy SC on a daily basis? They still do but they have an inherent bias, just like with any anticipated sequel, that will never live up to their expectations. | ||
|
madsweepslol
161 Posts
On May 27 2010 13:01 CyberPitz wrote: Would you listen to yourself? "OMG BLIZZARD IS SO HORRIBLE FOR WANTING TO UPHOLD THEIR INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS AS THE COMPANY THAT CREATED THE GAME!" esports is a secondary market. No company should be able to control a secondary market. It goes against the spirit of innovation that IP was designed in mind with. All too often people think IP is about protecting the content creator or lining their pockets. It's not. It's designed to promote progress. Companies controlling secondary markets quashes innovation and progress. | ||
| ||
