• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:11
CEST 00:11
KST 07:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder0EWC 2025 - Replay Pack1Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced25BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time EWC 2025 - Replay Pack Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 I offer completely free coaching services
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 706 users

SC2 High Ground Disadvantage? - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
cuppatea
Profile Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1401 Posts
May 11 2010 14:33 GMT
#21
I think it's good they've removed random elements from the game. Battles should come down to player skill, not luck, which is often the case when miss percentages are involved.
stenole
Profile Blog Joined April 2004
Norway868 Posts
May 11 2010 14:34 GMT
#22
It makes sense that choke points gives advantage to the defender once the army sizes are big enough. You even had this problem in BW if you let an opponent contain you outside your ramp. You try to break out and they shoot you to bits because you have to squeeze through the ramp while he has a nice half-circle going.
Orpheos
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1663 Posts
May 11 2010 14:34 GMT
#23
oh and i forgot. an example of chokes that created defender disadvantage at certain points in the game: Destination. those double bridges were a bitch to get out of.

so if your opponent has easy vision, then the highground and low ground essentially become the same, just like destination.
Chaos
Profile Joined July 2009
United States772 Posts
May 11 2010 14:44 GMT
#24
On May 11 2010 23:34 Orpheos wrote:
oh and i forgot. an example of chokes that created defender disadvantage at certain points in the game: Destination. those double bridges were a bitch to get out of.

so if your opponent has easy vision, then the highground and low ground essentially become the same, just like destination.


Destination also had a backdoor you could use if necessary ^^
FruitMarket
Perfect Balance
Profile Joined April 2010
Norway131 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 14:51:00
May 11 2010 14:49 GMT
#25
Notice how WoW-kids argue that we should "go back and play fucking BW" or "Blizzard is a company, they can do anything they want", every time we try to bring up things that are inferior about SC2. This phenomenon of corporate loyalty is more common among the younglings, I just think it's interesting to see how they are groomed to be perfect little consumers. What a dream for all companies.

"Don't like the fact that new products are filled with saturated fats and artificial sweeteners? You have no right to complain! Go back to the forest and eat leaves and roots!"

Embarassing.
"Do you REALLY want chat rooms?" - You're good Blizzard! I was just fakin' it!
AraqirG
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States266 Posts
May 11 2010 15:30 GMT
#26
This is only true when defending with a small numbers of units on the actual ramp itself. If you form a concave at the top of your ramp (a little back from the ramp itself) it gives you the advantage.

You don't want to engage when they get a concave around you. Position your units farther back so you engage when their units are stuck on the ramp.
EccoEcco
Profile Joined May 2010
United States61 Posts
May 11 2010 15:33 GMT
#27
It seems to me the mechanic is fine, and its the play that should be adjusted. High ground and a tight choke point are a valuable asset in the early game, and a liability by the time you get to the mid game. When you approach the tipping point, move to a more favorable location. Battles are won by those who control the terms of engagement. If you take a static position, you have given your opponent the option of attacking at the time he or she wishes and from whichever angle he or she wishes.

Why should a mechanic reward static and uninspired play?
There is a reward for losing: an opportunity to learn and improve.
ymirheim
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden300 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 15:47:26
May 11 2010 15:36 GMT
#28
I think people are going along thinking of things the wrong way with this game. I realize that it is a beta and to some extent we should be looking at balancing issues but like Day9 likes to say on the topic of unit balance. When you are playing, NEVER even get tempted to think that this or that unit is OP. Just objectively look at the rules of the game and see how you can work it to your advantage.

I feel that this applies a bit to the high ground topic because lets be honest, 90% of people who complain about the high ground mechanic are bdub players who want the bdub high ground mechanic back because it is "better" or whatever. But high ground is a mechanic that works exactly the same in both directions, if you are defending you have the same high ground advantage as a person you are attacking who is defending on high ground.

I think that people get stuck with the illusion that there is another mechanic to compare to (the bdub one) instead of spending their time figuring out how to best utilize the high ground in THIS game. I am sure there can be a very theoretical argument over what each system brings and it is definately true that the sc2 high ground mechanic and the bdub high ground mechanic results in different consequences and different play. But instead of wasting time on things like "wow I just lost and if the high ground was like in bdub then I wouldn't had" just spend your time on actually figuring out how to adapt to how this game works.

As a player, the game is never wrong, if you get beaten by high ground mechanics then it is YOU who are playing it wrong.


edit: I play terran and I make serious use of sieged tanks on the lowground with spotting and I agree that it is very effective. But you know why it is effective? Because people cheat.
And by cheating I don't mean literally hacking but they are cheating on defense and positioning. Not getting anti air to kill an aerial spotter, not having map control/scouting to see my tanks moving out in advance, not having units on the ramp or below the ramp to move out and hit the tanks before they siege up.
If you sit on your high ground with no vision below, no considerable anti air and then you let a terran move tanks up close to the high ground and siege them then you deserve to loose because you just got punished for disregarding too many important factors.
The only thing you should feel when you shoot someone... is the recoil
XiaoZhuPa
Profile Joined May 2010
Singapore30 Posts
May 11 2010 15:38 GMT
#29
I agree with the OP, I feel that even with sight the high ground should have a slight advantage (but maybe reduced versus when there is no sight). I find that the narrow choke is actually detrimental.

I like games that will reward you for clever positional play (i.e., you can defend with less units due to better position / micro).
Eat Me.
ymirheim
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden300 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 15:42:33
May 11 2010 15:42 GMT
#30
On May 12 2010 00:38 XiaoZhuPa wrote:
I agree with the OP, I feel that even with sight the high ground should have a slight advantage (but maybe reduced versus when there is no sight). I find that the narrow choke is actually detrimental.

I like games that will reward you for clever positional play (i.e., you can defend with less units due to better position / micro).

Kind of like breaking a static defense by clever use of sieged tanks and a viking to spot up high ground?
The only thing you should feel when you shoot someone... is the recoil
feather6
Profile Joined February 2010
48 Posts
May 11 2010 17:10 GMT
#31
On May 12 2010 00:36 ymirheim wrote:
...

If you sit on your high ground with no vision below, no considerable anti air and then you let a terran move tanks up close to the high ground and siege them then you deserve to loose because you just got punished for disregarding too many important factors.


Good post. I like the new high ground, it discourages blindly turtling. A ramp is an undeniable advantage in the early game when you can wall off, especially before there are air units. In the later game, someone who sits in their base + natural and completely cedes map control will be in trouble. Barring some cute tech timing (which will require luck or scouting anyway), turtles will lose. This is how I want it: if turtling is the optimal strategy, this will be a boring game to watch.

Every race has ways around a fortified choke, siege tanks on the side of your base are far from the only threat. Blink stalkers, siege-range Colos, old-fasiond ovie drops...
MorroW
Profile Joined August 2008
Sweden3522 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 17:18:21
May 11 2010 17:15 GMT
#32
everyone agrees with u and the ones who doesnt just want attention or seem smarter than the others
blizzard could at least try have it for some patch or 2 just to see the feedback. if it was a bad idea then switch back imo t.t

On May 12 2010 00:30 AraqirG wrote:
This is only true when defending with a small numbers of units on the actual ramp itself. If you form a concave at the top of your ramp (a little back from the ramp itself) it gives you the advantage.

You don't want to engage when they get a concave around you. Position your units farther back so you engage when their units are stuck on the ramp.

well that got nothing to do with highground. ur just talking about chokepoints and thats exactly whats bad about it. why even bother giving us high ground main bases when its so simple to get vision of the cliff anyway

reverse all maps from highground => lowground and i swear it will play the same
Progamerpls no copy pasterino
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
May 11 2010 17:16 GMT
#33
I think you haven't thought much about this and your argument is hardly convincing.
Moderator
DuneBug
Profile Joined April 2010
United States668 Posts
May 11 2010 17:34 GMT
#34
Not a big fan of the high-ground mechanic. For one, SC2 has chosen to be the only RTS i've ever played where there's no damage advantage from being on the high ground, well maybe not warcraft2. But I swear even C&C from '95 had a high ground advantage. And based on what Dustin said "it gives an advantage early and disappears late". Why would you want that advantage to disappear? To prevent turtling? Is turtling actually a problem, because I don't play too many games where someone turtles and actually wins (against a decent opponent).

And OP is right it can be a disadvantage later on as they can use ranged units to make an easy concave around what is basically a ball for your units trying to get out. Of course if you let a terran siege 5 tanks outside your ramp without some kind of plan you sort of deserve to lose. But I've played games before where I sent the zealots up the ramp with sentries below firing on everything in a nice arc while all their crap was jammed into the space on the ramp.

It's not like this is much different from BW.. Just tanks and ranged units would do less damage since they were lower, but it was still effective to put units on the lower ground, especially tanks.
TIME TO SAY GOODNIGHT BRO!
TecNoPhi
Profile Joined May 2010
United States25 Posts
May 11 2010 17:36 GMT
#35
The chokepoint and the high ground advantage allows for everyone of almost any skill level to survive the early game. As the game progresses, more options open up to players to brake that advantage. As it should, something like that done in early game shouldn't hold the same value late game.

In order to win you must have some kind of advantage, like better micro/macro, counter units, etc. Or putting your opponent at a disadvantage, like killing off harvesters, sniping expos, etc. Exploiting your opponents seemingly secure ramp, I could consider it the latter.
Fun
EmeraldSparks
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States1451 Posts
May 11 2010 17:38 GMT
#36
The loss of high ground miss chance basically comes down to one thing: the nature of defender's advantage.

The current system does grant defender's advantage, but in a tremendously all-or-nothing manner.

Either the high ground makes you completely unstoppable or it's completely worthless.

Many people liked it the old way better when it always gave a noticeable but not ever overwhelming advantage.

"Gimmicky"? Really? Come the fuck on.
But why?
AyJay
Profile Joined April 2010
1515 Posts
May 11 2010 18:14 GMT
#37
I'm really confused why they are not doing high ground advantage like in sc1. Maybe do 20% miss or something, current advantage doesn't feel like advantage at all lol =/
Westy
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
England808 Posts
May 11 2010 18:40 GMT
#38
On May 12 2010 00:36 ymirheim wrote:
I think people are going along thinking of things the wrong way with this game. I realize that it is a beta and to some extent we should be looking at balancing issues but like Day9 likes to say on the topic of unit balance. When you are playing, NEVER even get tempted to think that this or that unit is OP. Just objectively look at the rules of the game and see how you can work it to your advantage.

I feel that this applies a bit to the high ground topic because lets be honest, 90% of people who complain about the high ground mechanic are bdub players who want the bdub high ground mechanic back because it is "better" or whatever. But high ground is a mechanic that works exactly the same in both directions, if you are defending you have the same high ground advantage as a person you are attacking who is defending on high ground.

I think that people get stuck with the illusion that there is another mechanic to compare to (the bdub one) instead of spending their time figuring out how to best utilize the high ground in THIS game. I am sure there can be a very theoretical argument over what each system brings and it is definately true that the sc2 high ground mechanic and the bdub high ground mechanic results in different consequences and different play. But instead of wasting time on things like "wow I just lost and if the high ground was like in bdub then I wouldn't had" just spend your time on actually figuring out how to adapt to how this game works.

As a player, the game is never wrong, if you get beaten by high ground mechanics then it is YOU who are playing it wrong.


edit: I play terran and I make serious use of sieged tanks on the lowground with spotting and I agree that it is very effective. But you know why it is effective? Because people cheat.
And by cheating I don't mean literally hacking but they are cheating on defense and positioning. Not getting anti air to kill an aerial spotter, not having map control/scouting to see my tanks moving out in advance, not having units on the ramp or below the ramp to move out and hit the tanks before they siege up.
If you sit on your high ground with no vision below, no considerable anti air and then you let a terran move tanks up close to the high ground and siege them then you deserve to loose because you just got punished for disregarding too many important factors.


This is my main problem, its very easy to identify where you lost when YOU were holding the high ground to try and tech. It's because you didn't have enough units and the high ground gave you NO advantage at all. The solution? Do the same boring old build every single game. In competitive games where winning really matters, you will not see any interesting strats because there is no terrain advantage that allows someone to hold of a mass attack.
Antisocialmunky
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5912 Posts
May 11 2010 18:42 GMT
#39
On May 11 2010 22:33 Shades wrote:
overlords, observers and scans are 3 sacrifices that a player must make just to see the units at high-ground, this doesn't seem like much of an advantage. Although i do see your point, and i think the way it is at the moment is ok and too many people still have that 'if its not like bw then it must be bad' fever.


But those are incidental costs if you use a unit you already have(its not like they have cloak for scan).
[゚n゚] SSSSssssssSSsss ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marine/Raven Guide:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=163605
sCuMBaG
Profile Joined August 2006
United Kingdom1144 Posts
May 11 2010 18:57 GMT
#40
On May 11 2010 22:45 Shades wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 11 2010 22:36 kangur wrote:
On May 11 2010 22:33 Shades wrote:
too many people still have that 'if its not like bw then it must be bad' fever.

Don't fix it if it ain't broke.


BW and sc2 are two different games, sc2 isn't just a remake of sc1 in an attempt to 'fix' it. New game, new units, new mechanics, don't know how so many people don't realize that yet.



why do geeks like you have to screw up every thread where a serious discussion is going on.
just shut up and read.

you should try to prove your (or rather come up with ANY) arguments, instead of repeating this useless sentence over and over again.

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18:00
RO8 Round Robin Group - Day 4
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
ZZZero.O182
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Reynor vs ClemLIVE!
RotterdaM2667
ComeBackTV 2243
IndyStarCraft 593
WardiTV513
CranKy Ducklings183
3DClanTV 178
EnkiAlexander 153
Rex68
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 2667
IndyStarCraft 586
Rex 68
JuggernautJason59
StarCraft: Brood War
ZZZero.O 200
NaDa 27
Dota 2
capcasts256
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Grubby3459
JimRising 487
febbydoto13
Counter-Strike
fl0m2680
Fnx 2610
Stewie2K880
flusha483
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King2054
hungrybox1652
AZ_Axe497
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu464
Khaldor241
Other Games
tarik_tv20280
summit1g9187
gofns5544
Sick40
ToD29
Maynarde1
ROOTCatZ1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3132
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta39
• StrangeGG 35
• Adnapsc2 8
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22836
League of Legends
• Doublelift5557
Other Games
• imaqtpie1727
• Scarra847
• Shiphtur407
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
12h 49m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 11h
WardiTV European League
1d 17h
Online Event
1d 19h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.