Terran tourney wins? - Page 11

Post a Reply

Prev 1 9 10 11 All

Nosferatos

Norway783 Posts

May 10 2010 21:36 GMT

#201

SC2 Armory states that Bling is Light.

PredY

Czech Republic1731 Posts

May 10 2010 21:38 GMT

#202

i wish they were mate, but they are just biologic (they didn't change it in the last patch i hope did they?)

Nosferatos

Norway783 Posts

May 10 2010 21:43 GMT

#203

Hmm, when did they change that? Too me thats really odd seeing how almost every unit have one off the L/A/M as an attribute. Lol this actualy make Banes more imba XD

*EDIT* better yet, Archon is the only unit next too Banes that doesn't have LAM :O

PredY

Czech Republic1731 Posts

May 10 2010 21:44 GMT

#204

i actually thought they were light as well but then i realised in like patch 6 in a game vs mondi when it was too late

weeeee

Australia71 Posts

May 10 2010 21:46 GMT

#205

bling are just biological you can see for yourself in the map editor

Nosferatos

Norway783 Posts

May 10 2010 21:51 GMT

#206

Yeah saw it in the Map Editor, so went over too Battle.net and gave the patch note a look see. And you know what... no mention of turning the baneling to Bio only.

They told us when they changed HT and DT to L. Is this a bug no1 have seen yet? O.o

PredY

Czech Republic1731 Posts

May 10 2010 21:53 GMT

#207

i think they have always been only biologic since the start of beta

MorroW

Sweden3522 Posts

May 10 2010 22:01 GMT

#208

like 3 tanks is enough to kill 25 banelings before they do any dmg at all. its sick how tanks nullify ling and baneling
i honestly dont think there is any way to make the tanks better in tvp and worse in tvz at the same time which i think is needed atm. my tvz army atm is usually 70% tank xd

im maybe crazy and hallucinating but it feels like tank splash other tanks really little compared to sc1 where it was completely devastating to attack melee units that reached ur tanks. this could probably be because of that tanks r larger hit AT the target position and dont overkill => tank micro less important )

love how when i make my siege fe vs z and they try baneling bust and 1 tank kills 6/8 banes before reaching my wall lol

Nosferatos

Norway783 Posts

May 10 2010 22:07 GMT

#209

I was thinking in the same line MorroW, yet I remember I HATE it when my god awful stupid tanks pounds my marine/ Marauder force with splash from hitting enemy melee units. So I always target fire their ranged units instead, but if I can get in a shot before they close in why not ;D

Rabiator

Germany3948 Posts

May 11 2010 04:09 GMT

#210

On May 11 2010 07:01 MorroW wrote:
i honestly dont think there is any way to make the tanks better in tvp and worse in tvz at the same time which i think is needed atm. my tvz army atm is usually 70% tank xd

Isn't that a big part of the point of a Siege tank to "scare" the attacker away from its area of fire and make him come up with a - usually costly - way to deal with it? Some units are "not fair in a ranged duel" but have an achilles heel ... like being unable to hit air (Siege tank, Immortal, Marauder, Roach). The tank also has a minimum fire range which Zerg *could* abuse with burrowed Roaches *if* the Terran sucks and has no detection. Many Zerg players do not research burrow and burrowed movement for Roaches, but instead complain about the cost of them.