EPTbad for two workers
and
a bad position
?
The Gas Issue, second edition - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
bad for two workers and a bad position ? | ||
|
Dystisis
Norway713 Posts
| ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
|
craz3d
Bulgaria856 Posts
On September 29 2010 05:47 MrCon wrote: Can you explain the difference between bad for two workers and a bad position ? A bad position means, bad for 2 workers and for 3 workers. | ||
|
Restless-
Malaysia86 Posts
| ||
|
butter
United States785 Posts
Top: 3 (top), a good position 36 (bottom), bad for two workers Bottom: 8 (top), bad for two workers 31 (bottom), a good position Shakuras Plateau Top left: 44 (left), a good position 13 (right), a good position Top right: 45 (left), a good position 14 (right), a good position Bottom left: 42 (left), a good position 17 (right), a good position Bottom right: 41 (left), a good position 16 (right), a good position | ||
|
jamesltl
Malaysia159 Posts
| ||
|
[Atomic]Peace
United States451 Posts
| ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
Ascend
United States120 Posts
| ||
|
FetTerBender
Germany1393 Posts
On December 03 2010 16:13 Ascend wrote: I think it's definitely useful information for map makers, although the idea that I now should memorize which gases are "good gases" frightens me. To us "casual" gamers its even of less importance. You can use / abuse this if you have a build which needs gas but is very mineral heavy, so you want to keep rather 2 workers mining minerals than mining gas. Which would lead you to have only 4 workers at the geysirs and the rest of your workers mining minerals. The difference in using 1. or 2. are quite small, but as Artosis said yesterday at the GSL: If you add up all the small things, you can get yourself a pretty decent lead. The gas issue is nothing that puts you totally ahead or behind if you do not put it into consideration. | ||
|
guyincognito314
Ecuador24 Posts
| ||
|
evantrees
Canada497 Posts
| ||
| ||
