EPTThe Gas Issue, second edition - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
v3chr0
United States856 Posts
| ||
|
Diks
Belgium1880 Posts
| ||
|
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
| ||
|
QueueQueue
Canada1000 Posts
Thanks ^_^ | ||
|
NeonFlare
Finland1307 Posts
| ||
|
Zeke50100
United States2220 Posts
Sarcasm aside, very nice find. Now we can more accurately adjust our builds according to map positions :D (not too feasible during Ladder, but just imagine the implications on competitive gaming) | ||
|
Zexion
Sweden971 Posts
Good job man! | ||
|
PanzerDragoon
United States822 Posts
and one has to wonder why Blizzard didn't do any of these calculations, leading to positional imbalances on a couple maps. | ||
|
Monoxide
Canada1190 Posts
| ||
|
Marksman
Malaysia523 Posts
| ||
|
nttea
Sweden4353 Posts
| ||
|
IndecisivePenguin
United States771 Posts
| ||
|
Kisra
United Kingdom466 Posts
| ||
|
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
On May 06 2010 06:59 Kisra wrote: Very interesting stuff, hope it gets caught by Blizzard o.o would be embarresing if they werent aware of this already anyhow i hope this is good call for future mapmakers, always put gas S/W/E/N of town hall  | ||
|
zerodahero
United States358 Posts
| ||
|
crate
United States2474 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i43.tinypic.com/123tr2q.jpg) This is the most important image in your post imo. All the 79% and 74% spots mine at 100% with 3 workers. So if we want maps to be standardized with respect to gas mining we'd use only the 79% with 2 workers spots. Alternatively, use one 79% and one 74% or just 74% spots. It is interesting that the result is mostly symmetrical but gas on top mines slower than elsewhere. | ||
|
Re-Play-
Dominican Republic825 Posts
| ||
|
rahkshi
United Kingdom36 Posts
| ||
|
Dr.Frost
United States389 Posts
| ||
|
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
would appreciate if you replace all text with more pictures ty | ||
| ||
