EPTSearchable Ladder, Updated Daily - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
arcology
United States92 Posts
| ||
|
CauthonLuck
United States93 Posts
| ||
|
Xss
Canada53 Posts
| ||
|
Hold-Lurker
United States403 Posts
| ||
|
Gibybo
United States229 Posts
 (You may have to refresh it once to get it to reload the stylesheet).Also updated the rankings - there really seems to be a lot of activity in the top 5. IdrA down to 13th and the top 3 are brand new (to the top 3). | ||
|
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
I'm too lazy to log into sc2 beta right now to check but is this a bug? 30 2 Protoss Win.win 0 1746 12 148 7.5% How does somebody go 12-148 and get to a rating of 1746? | ||
|
Gibybo
United States229 Posts
 working on it...EDIT: Found the problem: for players that have more than 255 wins, their wins are stored in 2 bytes rather than 1 (duh!) so my scanner needs to account for that which it doesn't. If someone's record looks suspicious you can probably add 256 wins and it will be correct (essentially they are rolling over after 255). Will have it fixed later tonight I hope. EDIT 2: Should now be fixed. | ||
|
WorkersOfTheWorld
United States619 Posts
| ||
|
Gibybo
United States229 Posts
On April 11 2010 17:38 WorkersOfTheWorld wrote: I'm highly amused by those top ranked players sporting sub-10% w/l ratios. You don't see it anymore right? | ||
|
ReketSomething
United States6012 Posts
| ||
|
Dionyseus
United States2068 Posts
On April 11 2010 14:52 Gibybo wrote: I just pushed v2.0, looking for feedback/suggestions/bug reports (You may have to refresh it once to get it to reload the stylesheet).Also updated the rankings - there really seems to be a lot of activity in the top 5. IdrA down to 13th and the top 3 are brand new (to the top 3). Looks really nice but I think you should readd the time of last update note. | ||
|
Gibybo
United States229 Posts
On April 11 2010 19:14 Dionyseus wrote: Looks really nice but I think you should readd the time of last update note. Yeah I will, it was just causing some trouble with IE the way I initially had it in this design so I did a quick fix by deleting it. I'll add it back in a bit. In the future updates will be more frequent and they will be per player so it'l be part of the table (maybe when you highlight their name or something). | ||
|
Setz3R
United States455 Posts
| ||
|
ZenDeX
Philippines2916 Posts
WAIT WUT?! EDIT: errrr... apparently it's bugged on Nagash's database.. | ||
|
Gibybo
United States229 Posts
On April 11 2010 20:32 lolaloc wrote: 8th Place, Gale.zhang, 1865 rating, 8 wins, 181 losses WAIT WUT?! EDIT: errrr... apparently it's bugged on Nagash's database.. His site downloads from mine periodically. I had an error in my database and I fixed it, but his site must have downloaded it before the fix. It'll probably fix itself in a bit when he re downloads. | ||
|
JiYan
United States3668 Posts
| ||
|
Tindermate
United States19 Posts
cant wait for the EU equivalent | ||
|
pluu.mooh
Austria142 Posts
| ||
|
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
On April 11 2010 01:43 CauthonLuck wrote: Great work, I hope blizzard takes notice of how popular this is and at least ad an option to view ladder rankings overall by server if they insist on keeping the split divisions. Truth be told, nobody will care in the slightest about their division standing at high levels of play, and programs/sites like this one will be the "real" ladder standings if the system remains unchanged. I agree, except this doesn't show the "real" ladder standings either. Divisions aren't directly comparable because Blizzard decided to make a terrible system. Even though you're all playing the same pool of players, you get more points from these players depending on your division. Sweet! | ||
|
Gibybo
United States229 Posts
On April 12 2010 07:33 pluu.mooh wrote: yeah EU would be really great. Whats the problem so far that you cant make an EU ranking? having no EU Beta Key? Maybe someone could offer one, but i would really love to see EU rankings toO! I would need access to an EU account and a list of people in each division. Alternatively, when I get my reader program to a more stable and easy to use stage, I can offer it for download and crowd-source the rankings. On April 12 2010 07:45 shinosai wrote:I agree, except this doesn't show the "real" ladder standings either. Divisions aren't directly comparable because Blizzard decided to make a terrible system. Even though you're all playing the same pool of players, you get more points from these players depending on your division. Sweet! I think they are directly comparable. I don't think it's accurate that that you get a different amount of points based on your division, where'd you get that from? Keep in mind that it's not hard for me to adjust the points based on divisions if that would provide more accurate rankings. I just need evidence that it would be more accurate, On April 12 2010 02:19 JiYan wrote: tbh i dont like the new layout, it just makes things harder to see :[ Thanks for the feedback. Can you be more specific about why it's harder to see? Perhaps I can offer a choice of multiple layouts in the future. | ||
| ||
