|
Operating system: Windows 2.5.1.2600 (SP 3) CPU type: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz CPU Speed (GHz): 1.848 System memory (GB): 0.998 Graphics card model: ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 Graphics card driver: ati2dvag.dll Desktop resolution: 1280x720 Hard disk size (GB): 88.049 Hard disk free space (GB): 44.662
My processor is a dual core and this is what is coming up on my system snapshot. Does this mean I am a little bit short on processing power? If so wth should I do. I am a poor college kid.
|
that's a hell of a low requiriment . I'm so happy for that
|
On February 18 2010 07:19 Marine0945x wrote: Operating system: Windows 2.5.1.2600 (SP 3) CPU type: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz CPU Speed (GHz): 1.848 System memory (GB): 0.998 Graphics card model: ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 Graphics card driver: ati2dvag.dll Desktop resolution: 1280x720 Hard disk size (GB): 88.049 Hard disk free space (GB): 44.662
My processor is a dual core and this is what is coming up on my system snapshot. Does this mean I am a little bit short on processing power? If so wth should I do. I am a poor college kid.
You have two ~1.848 cores, meaning ~3.9ghz combined. I'd be shocked if SC2 doesn't properly support multi-threading.
|
On February 18 2010 21:25 Craton wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2010 07:19 Marine0945x wrote: Operating system: Windows 2.5.1.2600 (SP 3) CPU type: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz CPU Speed (GHz): 1.848 System memory (GB): 0.998 Graphics card model: ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 Graphics card driver: ati2dvag.dll Desktop resolution: 1280x720 Hard disk size (GB): 88.049 Hard disk free space (GB): 44.662
My processor is a dual core and this is what is coming up on my system snapshot. Does this mean I am a little bit short on processing power? If so wth should I do. I am a poor college kid. You have two ~1.848 cores, meaning ~3.9ghz combined. I'd be shocked if SC2 doesn't properly support multi-threading.
SC2 development started long before multiple cores became mainstream, so I doubt that two cores come close to yielding double performance.
That being said, you should still be fine, because multiplying 1.8 by only 1.3 already gives the minimum requirement. Just don't expect performance on par with a 3.9 GHz single core.
|
I think I'll just have to try it myself when it comes out. I'm a notch above every requirement except the CPU, where I have a 1.87 core 2 duo. Maybe the dual cores will make up for the missing MHz.
Edit: replies above me give me hope
|
I wonder if my laptop with an Intel GMA 4500MHD video card (well it's integrated so not a "card" raelly) could run this.
|
On February 19 2010 05:04 Jonoman92 wrote: I wonder if my laptop with an Intel GMA 4500MHD video card (well it's integrated so not a "card" raelly) could run this.
It runs pretty well on mine O_O I couldn't believe it lol, but it's at the lowest setting of course.
|
# Operating system:Windows 2.6.0.6001 (SP 1) # CPU type:Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2370 @ 1.73GHz # CPU Speed (GHz):1.753 # System memory (GB):1.999 # Graphics card model:ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 # Graphics card driver:atiumdag.dll # Desktop resolution:1280x800
Will my computer fly? Im expecting that it wont - but what do i have to upgrade in order to play? Im a dumbass with these kinds of things...
|
On February 19 2010 01:00 Commodore wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2010 21:25 Craton wrote:On February 18 2010 07:19 Marine0945x wrote: Operating system: Windows 2.5.1.2600 (SP 3) CPU type: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz CPU Speed (GHz): 1.848 System memory (GB): 0.998 Graphics card model: ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 Graphics card driver: ati2dvag.dll Desktop resolution: 1280x720 Hard disk size (GB): 88.049 Hard disk free space (GB): 44.662
My processor is a dual core and this is what is coming up on my system snapshot. Does this mean I am a little bit short on processing power? If so wth should I do. I am a poor college kid. You have two ~1.848 cores, meaning ~3.9ghz combined. I'd be shocked if SC2 doesn't properly support multi-threading. SC2 development started long before multiple cores became mainstream, so I doubt that two cores come close to yielding double performance. That being said, you should still be fine, because multiplying 1.8 by only 1.3 already gives the minimum requirement. Just don't expect performance on par with a 3.9 GHz single core.
i'd like to point out i have t2600 and ati x1400 and sc2 doesn't run. at all. can't even get a menu or nothing.
so yeah.. time to get a lappy with i5-540m n ati 5830 :S, that should run it fine methinks?
|
scratch that, it does run on my w7 (xp is a total no-go though), although there are hugeeeee slowdowns from time to time (from 20+fps to like <5fps), usually caused by fights but not always. anyway not really playable, but enough to try it out. would be playable without the slowdowns for sure though.
|
Playing without a video card. Works great.
|
how is noone on here dont have the beta yet i got an email yesterday saying i was eligible to dl the beta
|
looks like my piece of crap rig is gonna make it!
|
On February 19 2010 11:37 lilrizalboy wrote: how is noone on here dont have the beta yet i got an email yesterday saying i was eligible to dl the beta
The opt-ins were random...lucky man, a lot didn't get in.
|
damnit my computer doesn't fit these "low requirements"
why the hell did my dad choose such a fucking crappy computer just because its cheap i mean... -_-
i got the client downloaded but i open the joint and it doesn't even go to any log-in screen it just goes black and exits out to a ErrorReporter saying it crashed
does this mean my comp def can't run it?
apparently some people under the req's can run it, but maybe mine sucks way too much >_<
|
[ 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video cardc] is ati radeon HD 3600 better than that?
|
OPERATING SYSTEM:WINDOWS 2.5.1.2600 (SP 3) CPU TYPE:INTEL(R) CORE(TM)2 DUO CPU T8300 @ 2.40GHZ CPU SPEED (GHZ):2.414 SYSTEM MEMORY (GB):0.99 GRAPHICS CARD MODEL:MOBILE INTEL(R) 965 EXPRESS CHIPSET FAMILY GRAPHICS CARD DRIVER:IGXPRD32.DLL DESKTOP RESOLUTION:1280X800 HARD DISK SIZE (GB):143.251 HARD DISK FREE SPACE (GB):102.375
go ahead and say it. Is there absolutely no way?
|
On February 19 2010 13:58 Waffles wrote: [ 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video cardc] is ati radeon HD 3600 better than that?
Yes, significantly.
On February 19 2010 14:08 gumbum8 wrote: OPERATING SYSTEM:WINDOWS 2.5.1.2600 (SP 3) CPU TYPE:INTEL(R) CORE(TM)2 DUO CPU T8300 @ 2.40GHZ CPU SPEED (GHZ):2.414 SYSTEM MEMORY (GB):0.99 GRAPHICS CARD MODEL:MOBILE INTEL(R) 965 EXPRESS CHIPSET FAMILY GRAPHICS CARD DRIVER:IGXPRD32.DLL DESKTOP RESOLUTION:1280X800 HARD DISK SIZE (GB):143.251 HARD DISK FREE SPACE (GB):102.375
go ahead and say it. Is there absolutely no way?
There's a chance, IMO. G965 should be comparable to the minimum specs. It's worth giving it a shot.
|
On February 19 2010 14:08 Deux wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 13:58 Waffles wrote: [ 128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video cardc] is ati radeon HD 3600 better than that? Yes, significantly. Show nested quote +On February 19 2010 14:08 gumbum8 wrote: OPERATING SYSTEM:WINDOWS 2.5.1.2600 (SP 3) CPU TYPE:INTEL(R) CORE(TM)2 DUO CPU T8300 @ 2.40GHZ CPU SPEED (GHZ):2.414 SYSTEM MEMORY (GB):0.99 GRAPHICS CARD MODEL:MOBILE INTEL(R) 965 EXPRESS CHIPSET FAMILY GRAPHICS CARD DRIVER:IGXPRD32.DLL DESKTOP RESOLUTION:1280X800 HARD DISK SIZE (GB):143.251 HARD DISK FREE SPACE (GB):102.375
go ahead and say it. Is there absolutely no way? There's a chance, IMO. G965 should be comparable to the minimum specs. It's worth giving it a shot.
I'm using G965 in beta and can run it somewhat smoothly on low settings. It really isn't enjoyable though, I'd upgrade (I plan to). After watching streams running the game in high settings, it looks much smoother and enjoyable than my low settings.
|
CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 2.4GHz RAM: Corsair 4GB DDR2 1066MHz 2.1V GFX: XFX 9800GTX+ 512MB M/B: XFX 780i SLI PSU: OCZ 850W HDD: 4x WD 500GB @ 7200 w/RAID0+1 OS: Vista Ultimate 64 MOUSE: Logitech G3 LCD: 2x 24" LG Flatron @ 1920x1200
Anybody who has played with specs similar to mine, do you think I will be able to play @ 1920x1200 with all ultra settings? Seems from what I've heard that I'll only be able to handle high-ish if I want big battles to stay smooth
|
|
|
|