EPTBeta Sys Requirements are up, for real this time - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Skaff
United States240 Posts
| ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
| ||
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=24953 | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11567 Posts
| ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
On February 18 2010 05:01 FragKrag wrote: that kinda kills the point of LAN no? lol | ||
|
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
although i guess for lan parties it helps to have only lan but no internet | ||
|
AtlaS
United States1001 Posts
* Windows 95 or NT or superior * Pentium processor at 90 MHz or higher * 16 MB RAM * 80 MB available in the hard disk * CD-ROM, 2x or higher * DirectX 3.0 or higher I think I'll be OK with whatever specs blizzard decides to release. Pretty games are fun and all, but it is not the end all, be all. | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11567 Posts
AMD Athlon 64 1 GB DDR RAM Nvidia 7600 LOL | ||
|
Zexion
Sweden971 Posts
And btw, my computer is quite far above the other requirements. | ||
|
Undisputed-
United States379 Posts
On February 18 2010 05:05 FragKrag wrote: haha I just realized this means my old computer can run SC2 :D AMD Athlon 64 1 GB DDR RAM Nvidia 7600 LOL Yeah my 6 year old computer will be able to run it above min specs lol | ||
|
Puosu
7034 Posts
On February 18 2010 05:06 Zexion wrote: I kinda feel like a noob asking this, but how important is it to have the "recommended" operating system? It says Windows XP SP3 but I have SP2, will that be a problem? And btw, my computer is quite far above the other requirements. You should update it, its free. But no it wont matter in the performance of the game, afaik SP3 is a lot about security fixes and not as much about performance. | ||
|
Tsagacity
United States2124 Posts
On February 18 2010 05:01 FragKrag wrote: Probably depends on where you live? I haven't been to a LAN party that doesn't have internet in my entire life =/ (and yes, I LAN regularly)that kinda kills the point of LAN no? I would just LAN for the social experience + latency, both of which will apply for SC2. | ||
|
pheer
5399 Posts
On February 18 2010 04:10 Carnac wrote: I'm pretty sure SC2 is still gonna suck on a PC like that tho Yeah. These requirements are to RUN. They never said anything about PLAY... | ||
|
Toads
Canada1795 Posts
| ||
|
Harem
United States11393 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11567 Posts
| ||
|
da_head
Canada3350 Posts
On February 18 2010 05:08 pheer wrote: Yeah. These requirements are to RUN. They never said anything about PLAY... lol seriously? obviously you would be able to play the game, but with pretty much all the settings turned to minimum. | ||
|
Puosu
7034 Posts
Multiple people have posted screenshots on the Battle.net forum from different parts of the download edit: actually on the pics it only shows up as 1.64gb .. that sounds far too little. And yup far too little people talking about it too, probably just one troll posting on multiple accounts. oh well. | ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
On February 18 2010 04:59 Skaff wrote: Well not just Korea... but to have access to more people in the global market, they have to keep these specs down as low as possible. Electronics are higher than balls on a giraffe in some countries. Brazil | ||
|
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/5651/sc2beta.jpg ) ![[image loading]](http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/8826/screenshot20100217at308.png) if they're fake, theyre good ones | ||
| ||
