haaland has been good and its a credit to him to have as many goals as he does in peps system, which honestly isnt that suited to haalands game, but imo the 9 that city really needed was and probably still is kane.
haaland would have been better suited for a team like united, with games more back to front and space to run in behind. city needs a 9 that can do all the things a midfielder does but can also finish at the top. only kane fits that profile imo

sharkie

Austria18712 Posts

February 06 2023 07:29 GMT

#1583

Is haaland causing the same problems ibrahimovic did back at barca?

Liquid`Drone

Norway28873 Posts

February 06 2023 08:15 GMT

#1584

Naw. Haaland is doing great.

sharkie

Austria18712 Posts

February 06 2023 08:19 GMT

#1585

Ibra was also doing great at Barca scoring goals for fun

Liquid`Drone

Norway28873 Posts

February 06 2023 10:50 GMT

#1586

Zlatan had 16 goals in 29 la liga games. Not a great number for a striker for that Barcelona team, tbh. (Eto'o had 30 in 36 the season before). Haaland is at 25 in 20 in the PL. Sure, he didn't score in the previous game. But then he had a hat trick in the game before.

edit: I could agree that someone like Kane would be a better fit for City, but no matter how you slice it, Haaland has been great. The striker with 1.25 goals per game isn't the cause of problems for a team.

DropBear

Australia4422 Posts

February 06 2023 11:01 GMT

#1587

How good was Keylor Navas for Forest! Still the most underrated goalkeeper in the world for me

sharkie

Austria18712 Posts

February 06 2023 11:32 GMT

#1588

Yeah if he had been Spanish or South American he would be a legend

GTR

51660 Posts

February 06 2023 12:07 GMT

#1589

geez colour me surprised.

evilfatsh1t

Australia8913 Posts

February 06 2023 12:16 GMT

#1590

if they get points deducted gg no re. easiest win of arsenals life

so apparently its over 100 charges across 9 seasons. anything less than a massive points deduction would be an absolute embarrassment. honestly they should be relegated this season

Jockmcplop

United Kingdom9956 Posts

February 06 2023 13:09 GMT

#1591

Kick em out of the league!

aseq

Netherlands4015 Posts

February 06 2023 13:42 GMT

#1592

Interesting to see how bad this is, whether it's just some over-evaluation of a sponsorship deal or real shady stuff like paying players through other companies.

Chelsea board must be on the edge of their seats at the moment, good thing they probably have 4 years to prepare for the same circus.

Jockmcplop

United Kingdom9956 Posts

February 06 2023 13:44 GMT

#1593

On February 06 2023 22:42 aseq wrote:
Interesting to see how bad this is, whether it's just some over-evaluation of a sponsorship deal or real shady stuff like paying players through other companies.

Chelsea board must be on the edge of their seats at the moment, good thing they probably have 4 years to prepare for the same circus.

Alot of it is simply not providing the information that the Premier League need to investigate I think, but its over a very long time.

{CC}StealthBlue

United States41117 Posts

February 06 2023 14:50 GMT

#1594

Nothing will happen to them.

Jockmcplop

United Kingdom9956 Posts

February 06 2023 14:53 GMT

#1595

I can't help thinking the government's recently postponed 'independent regulator for the Premier League' report might have something to do with it.

gTank

Austria2662 Posts

February 06 2023 15:59 GMT

#1596

I also think thatn nothing will happen, clubs like Man City, Chelsea, Newcastle will kick fair play regulations in the head because their ridiculous amount of money can fix everything and how corrupt PL and UEFA are.

Deleted User 173346

16169 Posts

February 06 2023 16:49 GMT

#1597

--- Nuked ---

Pandemona

Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts

February 06 2023 20:20 GMT

#1598

Point deduction i highly doubt will come this season anyway it will be next i would think. Pep is the interesting party here, he said if they have lied to him, he will leave.