EPTtoo bad i bet on a stipe decision
2015 UFC/MMA Discussion Thread - Page 39
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
too bad i bet on a stipe decision | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17682 Posts
Well Tom Brady, move over. Deflate-gate ain't got nuttin' on Smilin' Sam Alvey... ![[image loading]](http://cdn.mmaweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Sam-Alvey-UFN65.jpg) http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/5/10/8581207/ufc-exec-on-sam-alveys-spray-tan-sponsor-logo-fighters-definitely | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24130 Posts
On May 11 2015 02:58 JimmyJRaynor wrote: the UFC introduces all these new standards about ring attire and advertising logos. we got 100,000 new rules governing the smallest of details about advertising on fighters. LOL Well Tom Brady, move over. Deflate-gate ain't got nuttin' on Smilin' Sam Alvey... Don't want that ad money to get diverted around Zuffa and all end up in the fighters pocket, that would be tragic. I do have to note the comedy of picking a fair skinned red head to advertise a tanning company though. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17682 Posts
fair skinned red heads burn really, really easily... of course if this is one of those spray-on tans... then well ... it is hilarious. i wonder if Sam is getting bonus money from these guys because of all the additional news headlines as UFC execs lay the hammer down on Sam. | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
fuckin beast although aldo at -130 is crazy | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17682 Posts
http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/5/11/8573771/the-mma-hour-with-khabib-nurmagomedov-carlos-condit-carla-esparza she said she wants to take her next fight in 6 months. it sounds to me like she still doesn't want to fight. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
I put 50 down on mayweather for my first bet. Easiest 25 bucks ever  | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/5/12/8595729/managers-expected-to-meet-in-las-vegas-to-discuss-business-of-mma good for them trying to get more money for both themselves and the fighters | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17682 Posts
maybe they'll come up with a unified counter-proposal http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/5/13/8594471/its-gotta-be-fixed-mma-managers-speak-out-on-ufc-reebok-pay-structure | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
On May 14 2015 02:24 wei2coolman wrote: I guess the biggest problem right now is UFC owns the fighters, and thus if UFC has contract obligations to a sponsor, their fighters have to have the same obligations (as far as representing the sponsor). So it's hard for fighters to have their personal sponsors because of chances that they might be competition with UFC current contract obligation with their sponsors. This is normal i think: When reebok sponsors LA lakers, koby aint allowed to wear nike's during a lakers game, seems logical, no? Is it bad? | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On May 14 2015 03:33 govie wrote: This is normal i think: When reebok sponsors LA lakers, koby aint allowed to wear nike's during a lakers game, seems logical, no? Is it bad? It'd actually be more like the Bose vs Beats thing going on in the NFL. While during game time, they can't be wearing beats otherwise players get fined, but players can still sponsor Beats individually. The thing is, there's so much advertising money, Beats is more than willing to pay the player fines in regards to wearing product when doing NFL stuff (such as wearing their earbuds during warm-up on the field) | ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
On May 14 2015 03:53 wei2coolman wrote: It'd actually be more like the Bose vs Beats thing going on in the NFL. While during game time, they can't be wearing beats otherwise players get fined, but players can still sponsor Beats individually. The thing is, there's so much advertising money, Beats is more than willing to pay the player fines in regards to wearing product when doing NFL stuff (such as wearing their earbuds during warm-up on the field) Exactly, quite similar. I do think that the top mma stars should not complain too much, the lower ranked players also need some money to survive, else the mma competition could not exist. Depending on how the money is divided, i think collective sponsorships can be a good thing. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On May 14 2015 03:57 govie wrote: Exactly, quite similar. I do think that the top mma stars should not complain too much, the lower ranked players also need some money to survive, else the mma competition could not exist. Depending on how the money is divided, i think collective sponsorships can be a good thing. While I'm sure top MMA stars are still pulling in cash, based on the current tier-list of award, they technically are hurt the worst from the deal. 40k is chump change compared to what they were getting before from sponsors, but the difference was the fight pouch was big enough that the extra sponsor money wasn't essential to their cost of living to prepare for the next fight. This shit just stinks for all the fighters, whoever organized the deal really fucked up this time. | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
On May 14 2015 03:57 govie wrote: Exactly, quite similar. I do think that the top mma stars should not complain too much, the lower ranked players also need some money to survive, else the mma competition could not exist. Depending on how the money is divided, i think collective sponsorships can be a good thing. lower ranked fighters were doing just fine, even the ones lower than schaub | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17682 Posts
However, i think Dana and Uncle Frank have cut separate special customized deals for the top stars to make sure their income either stays the same or improves. Around the time hte Reebok deal was first introduced ...If you listen carefully to interviews done with people like Rhonda and Conor they allude to these customized special deals. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
Amarant1995
Croatia155 Posts
| ||
| ||
