If you're going to try and pass it through a defence you need everyone thinking quickly.
2014 - 2015 Football Thread - Page 272
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9771 Posts
If you're going to try and pass it through a defence you need everyone thinking quickly. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Sack Roy PLEASE. Chambers is not a right back either, making same mistake stupid Wenger is. He is going to be a good centre back, play him there. Just like Phil Jones will be a good centre back. He has to play there, not as right back!!!! | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9771 Posts
Please don't say Redknapp for the love of god. | ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
Casillas is just terrible at this point. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
haitike
Spain2724 Posts
They should have kicked Del Bosque after the worldcup, he is reapeting the same errors again. | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9771 Posts
On October 10 2014 05:29 Pandemona wrote: Id rather just give it someone who has passion and not over think things. I don't think anyone can fuck up a national team (apart from Quieroz and whoever else Portugal has had lol). Southgate id pick right now at least his philosophy is about right. Hell im sure you could find some manager somewhere who would take it. Give it to Pardew lololol | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18590 Posts
I am so ashamed | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Hell id rather it was him than stupid Roy. He clueless. Id rather big sam too. He would make us win a tournament so easy with the way he plays. Top teams wouldn't be able to deal with us being so rigid at the back and playing target man xd It is ugly i know, but its the style England invented, you don't see Netherlands or Spain trying to play different ways half way through their football lives. But England are..... | ||
|
Mensol
14536 Posts
Pardew is definitely good enough to be Hodgson's successor. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18590 Posts
On October 10 2014 05:35 Pandemona wrote: Hell id rather it was him than stupid Roy. He clueless. Id rather big sam too. He would make us win a tournament so easy with the way he plays. Top teams wouldn't be able to deal with us being so rigid at the back and playing target man xd It is ugly i know, but its the style England invented, you don't see Netherlands or Spain trying to play different ways half way through their football lives. But England are..... Netherlands played differently for a few years and it got them into a WC final | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On October 10 2014 05:37 sharkie wrote: Netherlands played differently for a few years and it got them into a WC final Always on the basis of playing from the back though right? In terms of getting ball on the ground and passing it through your opponent, whether that is giving it to Overmars etc on the wing or not it was still not, what i mean with Big Sam and how England play? Strong defend, when you get the ball aim long for a 6ft strong striker to hold it up and play in speedy wingers/runners. Make your set pieces count etc? | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9771 Posts
| ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9771 Posts
Get rid of Gary Neville and get me in instead. I've done all the badges. I'm doing my coaching badges with the Welsh FA. I am on the last year of the pro licence. Whether I'm going to use it straight away I'm not too sure. Whether I can use it here I don't know. The career I have had should warrant me getting a job. Knobhead lol | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Neville is another guy im REALLY liking. He speaks so well on TV pundit and he passionate. I'd have him in charge of the whole thing. Defensively minded too. Him and Carragher would be a laugh together too xD But Campbell what an idiot...... | ||
|
SatedSC2
England3012 Posts
| ||
|
Micro_Jackson
Germany2002 Posts
On October 09 2014 22:20 Stratos_speAr wrote: They go hand-in-hand most of the time. It's not like you have all kinds of teams competing and then the same few teams just happen to pull it out every year. When you look at the PL, 15 teams have absolutely 0 chance to win it as of match day one, year in and year out, and the 5 teams that do have a chance to win it are always the same. The Bundesliga is marginally better (aside from this year and last), as there are different teams that can come up and be competitive (with a huge amount of luck), but it's still a couple powerhouses vying for the title every year, and MAYBE a random dark horse or two. La Liga just tends to be two competitors, maybe three on a good year. I don't think that you can just introduce things that Americans do to suddenly fix the problem, but there's definitely something that should be done, because it's pretty boring to see that 90% of football clubs have absolutely no chance of ever actually winning anything due to the system working against them. A lot of people want more parity. It's not like American sports are just a random roll of the dice to see who wins. You have to make good draft picks, you have to make quality free agent signings, you have to have the right coaching staff to properly coach and put in the right system, and finally you have to have the players perform. Representing American sports as a crap shoot like that is, at best, misleading and, at worst, blatantly lying. American sports have dynasties, they have story lines, they have power teams and perpetually awful teams and all of this. However, the difference is that, should the franchise get its shit back together and do really well in rebuilding the team, my Minnesota Timberwolves (NBA), have a legitimate shot at winning a title some day (they haven't even seen the playoffs in over a decade). Contrast that to Europe, where, unless Hell freezes over, we know that teams like Freiburg or QPR have 0% chance to ever win their respective leagues. Again, a draft wouldn't work at all and a salary cap American-style wouldn't just magically fix things, but there are some things that can be done beyond the joke that is FFP. You are underestimating how much influence playoffs have. For half the NBAs teams the seasons starts with the playoffs and the target is to win 16 games and thats it. Look at this year, the Spurs were a fantastic team but they were 1 bad game out of 90 away from beeing eliminated in the first round. Or the 2007 Dallas Mavericks, were they the best and most consistent team of the season? Yes but in US sport that doesnt matter if you loose 4 playoff games. You can like that or not but a european like league format will always reward consistency and consistant managements. | ||
|
4mgg
Finland373 Posts
| ||
|
SatedSC2
England3012 Posts
| ||
| ||