EPTSIGNING HIGH PROFIL PLAYERS WASNT ENOUGH, OIL KINGS WANTS MOAR!!
2013 - 2014 Football Thread - Page 564
| Forum Index > Sports |
Time to move on to the next thread http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sports/460943-2014-2015-football-thread | ||
|
Mensol
14536 Posts
SIGNING HIGH PROFIL PLAYERS WASNT ENOUGH, OIL KINGS WANTS MOAR!! | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
On January 24 2014 00:16 haitike wrote: By the way. Falcao has injured 6 months and He will not go to the World Cup. What, that's awesome for us. Well that came out wrong but you know what I mean. | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6342 Posts
On January 23 2014 23:15 Salteador Neo wrote: If the surplus for the Neymar signing means Rosell gets the fuck out, it's money well spent lol. Media in my country are saying Barcelona has a real risk of being thrown out of the champions league for two years and be docked 22 points in the Spanish league because of the shady money to Neymar. | ||
|
haitike
Spain2727 Posts
On January 24 2014 00:22 zeo wrote: Media in my country are saying Barcelona has a real risk of being thrown out of the champions league for two years and be docked 22 points in the Spanish league because of the shady money to Neymar. I think the lawsuit is against Rosell, not against Barcelona. So I don't think so. | ||
|
city42
1656 Posts
On January 24 2014 00:12 Ferrose wrote: The 2014 Deloitte Football Money League is out: http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/uk/industries/sportsbusinessgroup/sports/football/deloitte-football-money-league/index.htm The top 10: 1. Real Madrid: 518.9m euros 2. Barcelona: 482.6m euros 3. Bayern Munich: 431.2m euros 4. Man Utd: 423.8m euros 5. Paris Saint Germain; 398.8m euros 6. Manchester City: 316.2m euros 7. Chelsea: 303.4m euros 8. Arsenal: 284.3m euros 9. Juventus: 272.4m euros 10. AC Milan: 263.5m euros PSG's commercial revenue is quite possibly the phoniest thing I have ever seen. | ||
|
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
On January 23 2014 23:54 Liquid`Drone wrote: If you try to be a football player and fail you will know by the time you're what, 21? Still plenty of time to make another career of yourself - I have a good friend who is a surgeon who decided to become one at 22. Depends on the type of person. I don't think you can compare your friend to someone who has no working experience, no secondary education and only the very basic of high school education (sometimes not even with a diploma to show for it). Of the professional footballers in the team I support you would be surprised to know just how many are in that category. They aren't a complete lost cause obviously, but someone who has done those things is going to have a head start. On January 24 2014 00:28 city42 wrote: PSG's commercial revenue is quite possibly the phoniest thing I have ever seen. loool. Agreed, what a joke. Can't believe they are beating Chelsea, Arsenal and City. | ||
|
Mensol
14536 Posts
On January 23 2014 21:34 Pandemona wrote: WTF WENGER?! Arsene Wenger says the transfer of Juan Mata from Chelsea to Man Utd lacks "Fairness" WUT? Man up you sausage >.< + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BeqoGYpCUAAcJRj.png) lolol Even though im not fully agreeing with him, he has a good point. | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28797 Posts
| ||
|
haitike
Spain2727 Posts
| ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On January 24 2014 00:28 city42 wrote: PSG's commercial revenue is quite possibly the phoniest thing I have ever seen. Never thought id agree with a Spurs fan! But yes you are right what a complete load of fucking bollocks. Madrid rocking a massive £181million in commercial revenue which is about right Barcelona checking out at £176million Bayern with an outstanding £203million! Madness /gz Germanz Man Utd limp in with a respectable £152million considering the players they have had PSG just fuck it all up with £218million? WTF how is that even possible? They have 1 big marquee player in Zlatan the rest are just good players. How on earth is that even remotely possible >.< Man City £143million Commercial. Chelsea slow £89million Commercial >.< Mainly due to loss of Champions league Few things, Chelsea average 99% stadium capacity through out that season the money league reefers too compared to the 20k below at City and 5k below at PSG. That being said we still are +£25million on PSG matchday revenue and £30million on City :S Also our broadcasting fees are both higher than Man City and PSG >.< PSG get £77million and City get £88million. Chelsea still managed to get 105million without making champs league knock out rounds. Yet all that Chelsea drop to 7th a record low for us due to the magical Commercial revenue being made up by the Abu Dabi owners ;_; /RANT OVER Oh god more stuff in the full report; Social Media table, Facebook "likes" and Twitter "followers" Barca 52million facebook 10.9million twitter Real 49million facebook 9.9million twitter Man Utd 39milliom facebook 1.7million twitter Chelsea 21million facebook 3.3million twitter AC Milan 19million facebook 3.4million twitter Arsenal 19million facebook 3.4million twitter Liverpool 14million facebook 2.3million twitter Bayern 11million facebook 0.9million twitter City 8.4million facebook 1.4million twitter PSG 6.5million facebook 1million twitter More commercial :S can't even crack social media ;_; | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On January 24 2014 00:30 Ysellian wrote: loool. Agreed, what a joke. Can't believe they are beating Chelsea, Arsenal and City. I don't think it's THAT ridiculous. PSG are the only top flight club in a city with over 10 million people. Imagine if the Premier League only had one London club. | ||
|
city42
1656 Posts
On January 24 2014 01:15 Ferrose wrote: I don't think it's THAT ridiculous. PSG are the only top flight club in a city with over 10 million people. Imagine if the Premier League only had one London club. It IS that ridiculous! | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
I stand corrected. | ||
|
ZeroChrome
Canada1001 Posts
Get that Puma deal done and leave the fans alone ffs. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18636 Posts
On January 24 2014 00:48 Pandemona wrote: Never thought id agree with a Spurs fan! But yes you are right what a complete load of fucking bollocks. Madrid rocking a massive £181million in commercial revenue which is about right Barcelona checking out at £176million Bayern with an outstanding £203million! Madness /gz Germanz Man Utd limp in with a respectable £152million considering the players they have had PSG just fuck it all up with £218million? WTF how is that even possible? They have 1 big marquee player in Zlatan the rest are just good players. How on earth is that even remotely possible >.< Man City £143million Commercial. Chelsea slow £89million Commercial >.< Mainly due to loss of Champions league Few things, Chelsea average 99% stadium capacity through out that season the money league reefers too compared to the 20k below at City and 5k below at PSG. That being said we still are +£25million on PSG matchday revenue and £30million on City :S Also our broadcasting fees are both higher than Man City and PSG >.< PSG get £77million and City get £88million. Chelsea still managed to get 105million without making champs league knock out rounds. Yet all that Chelsea drop to 7th a record low for us due to the magical Commercial revenue being made up by the Abu Dabi owners ;_; /RANT OVER Oh god more stuff in the full report; Social Media table, Facebook "likes" and Twitter "followers" Barca 52million facebook 10.9million twitter Real 49million facebook 9.9million twitter Man Utd 39milliom facebook 1.7million twitter Chelsea 21million facebook 3.3million twitter AC Milan 19million facebook 3.4million twitter Arsenal 19million facebook 3.4million twitter Liverpool 14million facebook 2.3million twitter Bayern 11million facebook 0.9million twitter City 8.4million facebook 1.4million twitter PSG 6.5million facebook 1million twitter More commercial :S can't even crack social media ;_; PSG revenue is a joke but they even beat you in social media? o.O Wow Chelsea doesnt have a lot of supporters! :p | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On January 24 2014 01:39 ZeroChrome wrote: Upon seeing Arsenal's pie chart I can't believe that they're actually raising ticket prices at the Emirates again next season :S Imagine where some of the other clubs in that list would be if they were charging 60 quid for their cheapest seats too. Get that Puma deal done and leave the fans alone ffs. Those prices are only for category A games (ie when they play Man United, Chelsea, Spurs, etc.). The prices for other fixtures are much more affordable. | ||
|
ZeroChrome
Canada1001 Posts
On January 24 2014 01:44 Ferrose wrote: Those prices are only for category A games (ie when they play Man United, Chelsea, Spurs, etc.). The prices for other fixtures are much more affordable. Yeah I forgot about the categories. Regardless, Arsenal still charges more than any other club AND is raising prices for next season despite the 2 massive sponsorship boosts. http://news.arseblog.com/2013/12/club-announces-ticket-price-rise/ | ||
Lovedrop
2629 Posts
poor falcao | ||
|
Mafe
Germany5966 Posts
Awww. Was really excited what Colombia could do at the WC, but I guess this is/would be a tough blow for them; as depth of the squad is probably one of their major weaknesses, | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
Hopefully he only plays well AGAINST Chelsea, not for them. I'm excited to finally see him come to the Premier League, though. A bit sad that now I won't be able to buy him in FM  | ||
| ||
