data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
The 2012 Weightlifting Progress Thread - Page 14
Forum Index > Sports |
funkie
Venezuela9374 Posts
![]() | ||
Osmoses
Sweden5302 Posts
That's OK though, leveled up my deadlift. | ||
GoTuNk!
Chile4591 Posts
Squat: 157.5kgx3x10 OHP: 60x1, 70x1, 77.5x1 (PR, BW fuck yeah), 80x1Fx3 (T_T), 55kgx10-8-6-6-6 BB Curls: 20x12x3, 6x2 Happy about PR. Happy about squatting a shitload of weight and god I hate curls -.-. | ||
decafchicken
United States19932 Posts
| ||
steelANDmalice
87 Posts
deadlift: 365x8 OHP: 135x8x3 dumbbell rows: 75x10x5 feeling sick today ![]() | ||
theJob
272 Posts
Attempted a 9th rep but got pinned under the weight so I had to drop that shit on the floor. The owner was in the gym, staring at me – they don't like strength trainers in their fittness club :S Front squats: 60kg 10 reps x 3 Glute ham raises: 10 reps x 3 Leg presses: 150kg 10 reps x 3 Standing calveraises 10 reps x 3 Gripwork | ||
Ludrik
Australia523 Posts
On September 11 2012 03:03 decafchicken wrote: if i say the weight first then its "x weight for x reps for x sets" but if i do the reps/sets first its "x sets of x reps for x weight" just cause it makes more sense linguistically for me lol That's how I think of it too. Always have the reps next to the weight. Poll: What's your preferred way of writing reps, sets and weight? Weight x Sets x Reps (8) Weight x Reps x Sets (7) Reps x Sets x Weight (1) Sets x Reps x Weight (0) Weight x Reps-Reps-Reps-Reps (0) Reps-Reps-Reps x Weight (0) 16 total votes Your vote: What's your preferred way of writing reps, sets and weight? (Vote): Reps x Sets x Weight | ||
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
but i think it's pretty clear that most ppl use weight/reps/sets | ||
Zafrumi
Switzerland1272 Posts
| ||
funkie
Venezuela9374 Posts
Seems more logical to me. | ||
Malinor
Germany4719 Posts
| ||
Zafrumi
Switzerland1272 Posts
On September 11 2012 21:55 funkie wrote: I always use Weight x Sets x Reps. Seems more logical to me. imo it's pretty illogical. lets say you do 3 sets of 5 reps with 100kg, you would write it 100x3x5. assuming the x stands for "times", shouldnt the first number after the weight be the reps? because you lifted 100kg five times, and not three! and then the next number should be number of sets because you did the 100x5 three times! i.e. 100x5x3 but thats just my opinion. | ||
Osmoses
Sweden5302 Posts
| ||
mordek
United States12704 Posts
I don't think it's like a math problem though. Most of the people who like it that way just think of it that way. I don't think in my head, I did 100kg 5 times 3 times. I think I did 100kg for 3 sets of 5 reps. I think it's just linguistics like decaf said but it should be evident either way. It never bothered me ![]() | ||
![]()
Flicky
England2655 Posts
On September 11 2012 22:04 Zafrumi wrote: imo it's pretty illogical. lets say you do 3 sets of 5 reps with 100kg, you would write it 100x3x5. assuming the x stands for "times", shouldnt the first number after the weight be the reps? because you lifted 100kg five times, and not three! and then the next number should be number of sets because you did the 100x5 three times! i.e. 100x5x3 But you if you look at your wording "3 sets of 5" then that's the order for words. If you are speaking you would say you did 3 sets of 5, not 5 reps for 3 sets. | ||
Zafrumi
Switzerland1272 Posts
thats why I would totally write 3x5x100 (sets x reps x weight) which would be consistent with my wording :p | ||
funkie
Venezuela9374 Posts
On September 11 2012 22:39 Zafrumi wrote: hehe true. maybe its personal but I think the first number after or before the weight should be reps because of the "x". thats why I would totally write 3x5x100 (sets x reps x weight) which would be consistent with my wording :p lOLOL YOU OWNED YOURSELF BRO DUMB DUMB. <3<3<3 Btw, don't you guys find it "ironic" that a lot of gyms have a barbell and a dude squatting or pressing shit, and the people on said gyms, be it trainers or instructors rarely make people who ask them for advice these exercises?. Talk about false publicity yo. | ||
FFGenerations
7088 Posts
100kg 3x5 100kg, 3 sets of 5 repetitions per set if you didnt get a clearcut 100kg 3x5 then you have to write 100kg 5-4-3-5 when decaf/flunkie writes it differently its coz they do oly lifts which are mostly singles had a guy doing thumbless grip incline bp the other day :o strong AND brave thursday i finally get internet and can post an update.. i had 13 days without gym but then went the past 6 days in a row. so my overall progress is very little lol -__- goddamn i lose strength quickly. but i am doing chinups now at last and feel pretty awesome. life is way better without a job ![]() congrats frodac :D | ||
Luxae
Israel232 Posts
Squat 1x3 82.5, 102.5, 2x3 125kg Press 1x3 50, 60, 2-1 70kg PR Deadlift 1x1 120, 150, 165, 185kg PR The heavy double on the press is the PR. Slightly disappointed, because I wanted to get triples (which is what I had originally wrote as my goal by September 2013, so I'll probably be getting that "a bit" sooner). Sunday is Jewish new year, so I'm not sure if I'll manage to get a work out, since the gym closes early, but atleast the dinner should be very good ![]() | ||
NeedsmoreCELLTECH
Netherlands1242 Posts
The sets is something that added LESS OFTEN, and should therefore be an addendum. Seeing as we read from left to right, from old to young, the sets should be the last in line. Also fucking Luxae, I just took a deload week. I'll come back at your DL, going for 175x5 in about 3 weeks. | ||
| ||