asoiaf is alright but gets boring. If you're looking for kinda trashy but still wildly successful modern fantasy then Wheel of Time is a much better comparison.
ez
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
eieio
United States14512 Posts
February 15 2015 23:35 GMT
#85501
asoiaf is alright but gets boring. If you're looking for kinda trashy but still wildly successful modern fantasy then Wheel of Time is a much better comparison. ez | ||
|
red_
United States8474 Posts
February 15 2015 23:37 GMT
#85502
On February 16 2015 08:21 Numy wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2015 07:56 red_ wrote: I haven't and won't read the book or see the movie, but from what I've gathered reading about them it sounds like some hilariously cliche/stereotypical female writing that affirms everything red-pill type dudes say about them. So ya, basically what Teut said. Stereotypical female writing? Don't see what's wrong with female writing lol, am I missing the joke? :< You're reading an insult into my statement where there isn't one. There doesn't have to be anything wrong with female writing, it's just that 50 Shades sounds like it was written as the stereotypical female fantasy. Also Duvon no I wouldn't consider myself a red-pill person. | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
February 15 2015 23:41 GMT
#85503
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
February 15 2015 23:43 GMT
#85504
| ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
February 15 2015 23:50 GMT
#85505
On February 16 2015 07:50 WaveofShadow wrote: http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-reviews/dune-prequels/ Some the comments are actually better than the review itself. The violence wasn't a problem for me. My issues can be summed up pretty well by comments 18 and 19. Especially 19. Oh baby we goin ham.. someone get the guile theme ready cus I'm about sonic boom this review and these comments. I'ma ignore this poor mans dislike of violence in books because you yourself admit the violence wasn't a problem for you but I will say it'd a flashing red light of danger and when you spend the majority of your review complaining about it. The world is violent, just as violent as the original books, he's one step away from declaring the entire series a "murder simulator fantasy" from the looks of it. He enjoys the political machinations but thinks that they are too excessive. The point of which is to show how complex, convoluted and excessive they are, as they lead to the events and tragedies that happen in both these books and Dune itself. I enjoy the concept of fleshing out characters as I want to know more about a person, yes even the Baron. Who according to this reviewer is gay-baiting? After looking up what exactly that means, I can't help but laugh at it. Yet he's the balls to say they should of read the books more or some such tripe. As far as the comment's are concerned 18 is literally a conspiracy theory mixed with the growing doubt in my head that he's never read the books as the person himself believes he doesn't have to read something to be able to comment on it critically. Quite frankly I think he's die hard fan unwilling to accept that perhaps FH wasn't the end all be all of science fiction. 19, is the "they didn't really read the books", and the writing isn't like Frank Herberts(Read: Not as dense). He then compares the works to 90's soap opera. The irony of which is that royal courts often do play out like soap opera and that the comparison is actually fairly apt. So what I've gathered reading this is that you, Wave. Do not care for the books because you think the writing isn't like Frank Herbert's. Along with this you didn't want to know more about the past and would of much rather kept it to an air of mystery. That's reasonable. I on the other hand did want to know more and these kind of books are wonderful for people like me who enjoy learning about characters before they became what we think of them. If that makes sense. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23342 Posts
February 15 2015 23:54 GMT
#85506
On February 16 2015 08:35 eieio wrote: honestly everything is shit except stuff I like and your opinion is only correct if you agree with me asoiaf is alright but gets boring. If you're looking for kinda trashy but still wildly successful modern fantasy then Wheel of Time is a much better comparison. ez wot is incredible though and decently well respected though people have problems taking the female main characters seriously i mean for some perspective the 3 slow books of WoT were realized in 2 year gaps (the first ones about ~1 year gaps) while it took 5 years for feast for crows (lol) and 6 years for DWD On February 16 2015 08:21 Numy wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2015 07:56 red_ wrote: I haven't and won't read the book or see the movie, but from what I've gathered reading about them it sounds like some hilariously cliche/stereotypical female writing that affirms everything red-pill type dudes say about them. So ya, basically what Teut said. Stereotypical female writing? Don't see what's wrong with female writing lol, am I missing the joke? :< as in hot rich powerful high social status relatively young successful man takes interest inexplicably in a woman of nondescript background and personality and looks and is super dominant/controlling/powerful/dangerous in the whole interaction in the (notoriously misogynistic) redpillers view women crave alpha males for excitement (dopamine) and then "settle" with "beta males" and raise a family with them (oxytocin) you'd read 50 shades for excitement and im not sure twilight probably a mix of both as relationship develops but plenty of excitement in more male fantasy you have a nondescript backround ordinary dude develops super powers of some kind and becomes super high status and has adventures kills the bad guys gets the girl its pretty much the same thing except in the male version you're becoming the super high status guy doing interesting things and if the female version you're getting to bang that guy chick lit tends to focus mostly on the romance and the situations are just a way to build the romance while in kinda shonen-y stuff the romance is the cute sidestory to add a bit more feel good to the otherwise serious nature of events | ||
|
eieio
United States14512 Posts
February 16 2015 00:04 GMT
#85507
On February 16 2015 08:54 Slayer91 wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2015 08:35 eieio wrote: honestly everything is shit except stuff I like and your opinion is only correct if you agree with me asoiaf is alright but gets boring. If you're looking for kinda trashy but still wildly successful modern fantasy then Wheel of Time is a much better comparison. ez wot is incredible though and decently well respected though people have problems taking the female main characters seriously i mean for some perspective the 3 slow books of WoT were realized in 2 year gaps (the first ones about ~1 year gaps) while it took 5 years for feast for crows (lol) and 6 years for DWD I was a huge WoT fan and I've read them all several times, but the books dragged on EVEN MORE than asoiaf which is impressive. Yeah a lot of the women in the book are hard to take seriously, Jordan doesn't really write a lot of different characters. Also Perrin is absolutely insufferable, when I reread the books I just skip his dream chapters at this point. The dreams are like an exercise in heavy handed metaphors. That being said the magic system in the books was super cool and I only started to really get frustrated with the series after Jordan died and Sanderson took over. The books were still ok until the ending though which was utter bullshit with way too happy and neat of an ending. | ||
|
Eppa!
Sweden4641 Posts
February 16 2015 00:16 GMT
#85508
On February 16 2015 08:41 GhandiEAGLE wrote: Im not sure if its hilarious or depressing. I was hyped for Evolve https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moTvp6tamn4 I really wonder if they made a lot of money with. I mean it could be like PAYDAY 2 where you buy it for a $10-20 and then you get microtransactions instead. I am not buying a game of that size for 60$ with or without DLC. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
February 16 2015 00:25 GMT
#85509
On February 16 2015 08:50 Parnage wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2015 07:50 WaveofShadow wrote: http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-reviews/dune-prequels/ Some the comments are actually better than the review itself. The violence wasn't a problem for me. My issues can be summed up pretty well by comments 18 and 19. Especially 19. Oh baby we goin ham.. someone get the guile theme ready cus I'm about sonic boom this review and these comments. I'ma ignore this poor mans dislike of violence in books because you yourself admit the violence wasn't a problem for you but I will say it'd a flashing red light of danger and when you spend the majority of your review complaining about it. The world is violent, just as violent as the original books, he's one step away from declaring the entire series a "murder simulator fantasy" from the looks of it. He enjoys the political machinations but thinks that they are too excessive. The point of which is to show how complex, convoluted and excessive they are, as they lead to the events and tragedies that happen in both these books and Dune itself. I enjoy the concept of fleshing out characters as I want to know more about a person, yes even the Baron. Who according to this reviewer is gay-baiting? After looking up what exactly that means, I can't help but laugh at it. Yet he's the balls to say they should of read the books more or some such tripe. As far as the comment's are concerned 18 is literally a conspiracy theory mixed with the growing doubt in my head that he's never read the books as the person himself believes he doesn't have to read something to be able to comment on it critically. Quite frankly I think he's die hard fan unwilling to accept that perhaps FH wasn't the end all be all of science fiction. 19, is the "they didn't really read the books", and the writing isn't like Frank Herberts(Read: Not as dense). He then compares the works to 90's soap opera. The irony of which is that royal courts often do play out like soap opera and that the comparison is actually fairly apt. So what I've gathered reading this is that you, Wave. Do not care for the books because you think the writing isn't like Frank Herbert's. Along with this you didn't want to know more about the past and would of much rather kept it to an air of mystery. That's reasonable. I on the other hand did want to know more and these kind of books are wonderful for people like me who enjoy learning about characters before they became what we think of them. If that makes sense. K but Srsly though go idle on TS for a while and I'll be on later to discuss with you (if you'll be at your computer for a while). Doesn't make sense to discuss this in thread if no one else cares (and I'm incredibly ineloquent unless I have time to seriously plan out and research arguments s/answers | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
February 16 2015 00:27 GMT
#85510
Something happened with Fionn? | ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
February 16 2015 00:27 GMT
#85511
| ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23342 Posts
February 16 2015 00:28 GMT
#85512
On February 16 2015 09:04 eieio wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2015 08:54 Slayer91 wrote: On February 16 2015 08:35 eieio wrote: honestly everything is shit except stuff I like and your opinion is only correct if you agree with me asoiaf is alright but gets boring. If you're looking for kinda trashy but still wildly successful modern fantasy then Wheel of Time is a much better comparison. ez wot is incredible though and decently well respected though people have problems taking the female main characters seriously i mean for some perspective the 3 slow books of WoT were realized in 2 year gaps (the first ones about ~1 year gaps) while it took 5 years for feast for crows (lol) and 6 years for DWD I was a huge WoT fan and I've read them all several times, but the books dragged on EVEN MORE than asoiaf which is impressive. Yeah a lot of the women in the book are hard to take seriously, Jordan doesn't really write a lot of different characters. Also Perrin is absolutely insufferable, when I reread the books I just skip his dream chapters at this point. The dreams are like an exercise in heavy handed metaphors. That being said the magic system in the books was super cool and I only started to really get frustrated with the series after Jordan died and Sanderson took over. The books were still ok until the ending though which was utter bullshit with way too happy and neat of an ending. all books spoilers + Show Spoiler + I don't know, as I read more and more I get less and less annoyed by the characters, I feel like when I was younger I was seeing the rand/mat/perrin perspective of being perplexed and now im slightly wiser I can see a more top down perspective of these young idiots with a lot of power and influence botching things while the adults try to rein everything in (remember in book 2 Verin is trying to talk the way out of everything with whitecloaks and suddenly Elayne starts proclaiming her heiress status and egwene starts channeling at them LOL probably before I was like YEAH YOU GO GIRL SHOW THOSE WHITECLOAK CUNTS and now im just like IDIOTS JUST WAIT FOR VERIN TO SORT IT) I get what you mean about the characters. The evil guys are little too evil and the good guys are a little too good but then its a good vs evil story and it never claims to be anything else. GRRM has great characters but I don't really like most of them. I like pretty much all the characters in WoT even if they annoy me sometimes. The gender dynamics are prevalent a lot which tends to be rare in a fantasy. It's usually handled by like having either only a few female characters (tolkien etc) or having them pretty much the same as male characters but they just have to experience the setting as a female so they have a lot of new challenges (thats what I see a lot inASOIAF, Brienne Arya basically do guy things as women, Cersei always complains about being a woman and Cersei/CAtelyn are just like male characters but with strong protectiveness toward their kids.) But then its handled a bit awkwardly in WoT because its SUPER segregated and genders are paired way more than in our current setting which leads to cool dynamics but then you share a lot of similarities between characters of the same gender (women with all the hands on hips yelling at men to see sense and men with the overprotectiveness recklessness and stoicism) I think you have to give some leeway to RJ since men are obviously going to have a harder time seeing into the mind of a woman and vice-versa. When I read fantasy by women the male main characters can tend to be a bit more bland in terms of the nuances of their thought processes, for example, while the female characters can be more interesting with strange nuances and dislikes/likes. Even if the characters themselves are well grounded and defined. -Nynaeve is my favourite character nowadays, she shows incredible bravery and determination (rand level shit but with more intelligence and humour) but she has huge issues emotionally obviously and she develops that quite a bit. the contradictions in nynaeves thought processes are constant and hilarious and she's aware of them in a way but emotionally she can't handle the truth. -Egwene I dislike a bit more she's clearly really immature but strong willed and thats how she gets away with it most of the time. very childish but matures a lot with the Aiel. -Elayne is clearly a spoilt rich kid with daddy issues but definitely a good egg hilariously brave also. (Nynaeve and elayne constantly dick-measuring bravery against each other LOL in tanchico when they didn't want to channel to avoid attracting attention when they didn't take escorts and were getting mugged elayne charged some dude with a cudgel screaming "FOR THE WHITE LION" LOOOL) All the browbeating and bullying a lot of people thought was weird I thought it seemed like a standard exasperated country woman but it could be just me being biased because i like the books so much also not many readers come from the country i suppose lol -Perrin annoys me a lot too the whole point is that he's basically just really retarded ("i think slowly hurr") and has trouble coming to some of the correct conclusions. Faile is annoyed constantly because she takes his overprotectiveness as lack of respect and its a clash of cultures where perrin comes from the two rivers thing of your always put the woman first and if she's acting mad you just bear it and apologize while Faile wants to be treated as an equal and she's a lot cleverer and more competent than him but if she has to explain everything to him then its degrading to him so she's mad all the time. I'm surprised you were overly annoyed about the ending. It's a good vs evil novel and a lot of bad shit happened anyway but you know good has to win in the end. I don't see why killing some main characters is necessarily a good thing. A ton of other guys died I don't think its too bad to have most of the main characters doing alright. It's difficult to feel good about an ending when the good guys won but you have nobody alive that would make you feel good about them winning. I thought sandersons work was excellent honestly probably much better than jordan could have finished it at his age and health | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
February 16 2015 00:36 GMT
#85513
On February 16 2015 09:27 WaveofShadow wrote: Random q: Something happened with Fionn? He's working for the The Score doing esports coverage for them now. You should know them Mr. Canadian lol. Edit: Although I guess I don't know if you really follow sports in any capacity. | ||
|
Sunaj
Canada2041 Posts
February 16 2015 00:39 GMT
#85514
On February 16 2015 09:25 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2015 08:50 Parnage wrote: On February 16 2015 07:50 WaveofShadow wrote: http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-reviews/dune-prequels/ Some the comments are actually better than the review itself. The violence wasn't a problem for me. My issues can be summed up pretty well by comments 18 and 19. Especially 19. Oh baby we goin ham.. someone get the guile theme ready cus I'm about sonic boom this review and these comments. I'ma ignore this poor mans dislike of violence in books because you yourself admit the violence wasn't a problem for you but I will say it'd a flashing red light of danger and when you spend the majority of your review complaining about it. The world is violent, just as violent as the original books, he's one step away from declaring the entire series a "murder simulator fantasy" from the looks of it. He enjoys the political machinations but thinks that they are too excessive. The point of which is to show how complex, convoluted and excessive they are, as they lead to the events and tragedies that happen in both these books and Dune itself. I enjoy the concept of fleshing out characters as I want to know more about a person, yes even the Baron. Who according to this reviewer is gay-baiting? After looking up what exactly that means, I can't help but laugh at it. Yet he's the balls to say they should of read the books more or some such tripe. As far as the comment's are concerned 18 is literally a conspiracy theory mixed with the growing doubt in my head that he's never read the books as the person himself believes he doesn't have to read something to be able to comment on it critically. Quite frankly I think he's die hard fan unwilling to accept that perhaps FH wasn't the end all be all of science fiction. 19, is the "they didn't really read the books", and the writing isn't like Frank Herberts(Read: Not as dense). He then compares the works to 90's soap opera. The irony of which is that royal courts often do play out like soap opera and that the comparison is actually fairly apt. So what I've gathered reading this is that you, Wave. Do not care for the books because you think the writing isn't like Frank Herbert's. Along with this you didn't want to know more about the past and would of much rather kept it to an air of mystery. That's reasonable. I on the other hand did want to know more and these kind of books are wonderful for people like me who enjoy learning about characters before they became what we think of them. If that makes sense. K but Srsly though go idle on TS for a while and I'll be on later to discuss with you (if you'll be at your computer for a while). Doesn't make sense to discuss this in thread if no one else cares (and I'm incredibly ineloquent unless I have time to seriously plan out and research arguments s/answers If it means anything, I'd like to read it. Although I've only read the orginal series and the Jihad series. And I didn't think the Jihad series was that bad as it was far enough removed from the originals time wise that I dealt with it. edit* On the WoT stuff, I loved the ending, was a decent mix of bittersweet and happiness. Also made me immensely sad as it was written by Jordan himself, and I actually teared a little when it was all said and done. And heck, I only started the series in 2004. I can only imagine how long time readers with the series from the start reacted. | ||
|
JonGalt
Pootie too good!4331 Posts
February 16 2015 00:55 GMT
#85515
On February 15 2015 17:27 MooMooMugi wrote: Drunk mugi palying normals with coma, kissblade, jongalt, and jeff, what a wonderful crew to spend single awareness day with <3 you all :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Drunk support Malzahar OP | ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
February 16 2015 00:58 GMT
#85516
K, dont wait up, I have to solve a parking dispute because thats what I wanted to do tonight. I need to move.. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
February 16 2015 01:15 GMT
#85517
| ||
|
Cixah
United States11285 Posts
February 16 2015 01:25 GMT
#85518
On February 16 2015 08:25 GhandiEAGLE wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2015 08:21 Cixah wrote: On February 16 2015 08:19 GhandiEAGLE wrote: Holy shit that was insane. No it wasn't. It was pretty standard of every TSM v CLG game. CLG wins the first 35 minutes, and then insert random stupidity from both teams for 10-15 more minutes and then one person wins. If you don't think that was a good game then you're just salty that your fantasy team got outpotential'd I would be if i had lost Fantasy this week lol. Scip's pretty salty tho. | ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
February 16 2015 01:40 GMT
#85519
On February 16 2015 10:15 WaveofShadow wrote: K let me know, I'm around. okay Im around now. That was fun~ | ||
|
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
February 16 2015 01:49 GMT
#85520
On February 16 2015 07:42 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On February 16 2015 07:38 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: On February 16 2015 07:33 Parnage wrote: Jodorowsky's Dune would not of been good. It's spectacle for the sake of spectacle. That's not what Dune is in my opinion at least. Dear Wave, I haven't finished reading the Jihad books but from what I read I rather enjoyed them as well. Also I still rather like the Houses trio. Muwahahahaha. butlerian jihad is my favorite subsection of the dune books. that's the one with erasmus and omnius right? Actually, fuck it. Trolling or not I'm going to find that review. i'm not trolling, i seriously loved those books lol edit: wait, not those ones these ones http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_prequel_series#Legends_of_Dune | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Afreeca Starleague
hero vs ggaemo
Larva vs Mong
The Patches Monday
Afreeca Starleague
Soulkey vs PianO
JyJ vs sSak
GSL
PiGosaur Cup
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
Mini vs Calm
Queen vs EffOrt
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
[ Show More ] GSL
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|