EPTI knew what fracking was because I vaguely recall watching a Real Time with Bill Maher where that was what they were arguing about.
Off-Topic General Discussion - Page 1963
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
phathom321
United States1730 Posts
I knew what fracking was because I vaguely recall watching a Real Time with Bill Maher where that was what they were arguing about. | ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On May 15 2014 00:13 Cixah wrote: I'll be in Teamspeak again watching the games for TI4 qualifiers. Liquid vs NAR is up first in about an hour  I've never cooked with wine before and tonight that will change. THE RECIPE CALLS FOR IT SO IT MUST BE DONE. I have no idea what I'm doing  I wish I could watch with you but I have to act like I'm working when I work from home. Edit: Instead I just have it up in the background. | ||
|
red_
United States8474 Posts
| ||
|
Frudgey
Canada3367 Posts
On May 15 2014 01:02 Requizen wrote: True Imperial Loyalists get 13/13. Calls himself an Imperial Loyalist. Then proceeds to play Necrons for Warhammer 40K table top. Where I at least play Imperial Guard for the Dawn of War series. I CAN PLAY THIS GAME TOO VILE HERETIC + Show Spoiler [Counter argument to my argument] + But then one could say that at least Requizen provides hard evidence that he plays Necrons by posting pictures. In my case you'd have to believe that I play Imperial Guard solely on what I say. However, it could be just as likely that I play Eldar or Chaos and I'm just simply lying to you guys in order to be accepted in this sub forum. And then by that standard, I'm no better than Requizen. And in fact, Requizen could make the case that those pictures of his Necrons aren't actually his, but just pictures he found online. He could say that he actually has a Space Marine Army, but he is too embarrassed to post pictures of them on this sub forum. (Which would make sense, as we are all "Heretics" according to him. So really, I could actually be a heretic where Requizen could really be the loyalist one. I really didn't accomplish much with this. I tore down my entire argument. | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
Quick FYI I love you | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
COINCIDENCE?! | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
| ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
I'm considering picking up the books (because for some reason the new edition BRB is 3 books now) on Saturday before we leave and just bringing the rulebook with me to pore over while on the plane. On May 15 2014 01:14 Frudgey wrote: Calls himself an Imperial Loyalist. Then proceeds to play Necrons for Warhammer 40K table top. Where I at least play Imperial Guard for the Dawn of War series. I CAN PLAY THIS GAME TOO VILE HERETIC + Show Spoiler [Counter argument to my argument] + But then one could say that at least Requizen provides hard evidence that he plays Necrons by posting pictures. In my case you'd have to believe that I play Imperial Guard solely on what I say. However, it could be just as likely that I play Eldar or Chaos and I'm just simply lying to you guys in order to be accepted in this sub forum. And then by that standard, I'm no better than Requizen. And in fact, Requizen could make the case that those pictures of his Necrons aren't actually his, but just pictures he found online. He could say that he actually has a Space Marine Army, but he is too embarrassed to post pictures of them on this sub forum. (Which would make sense, as we are all "Heretics" according to him. So really, I could actually be a heretic where Requizen could really be the loyalist one. I really didn't accomplish much with this. I tore down my entire argument. To be fair, I also have Grey Knights, Scions, and a few assorted Marine type dudes. I have 0 Chaos or Daemon models, so while I might be a Xenos, I'm not a Heretic. get@me <3 bb | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
| ||
|
Nos-
Canada12016 Posts
On May 15 2014 01:33 Slayer91 wrote: is nitrogen fucking everyone or what electron size vs atom size fucked me somehow | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On May 15 2014 01:36 Fusilero wrote: Embrace the xenos for the greater good req :> goddamn communist fish | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
How? Atoms are made up of Electrons, Protons, and Neutrons. This is like 6th grade shit. | ||
|
Nos-
Canada12016 Posts
On May 15 2014 01:38 Requizen wrote: How? Atoms are made up of Electrons, Protons, and Neutrons. This is like 6th grade shit. It was one of those things where the moment I entered my answer I realized I fucked up also guess who didn't pay attention in class until it was time for university applications? This guy right here | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
in terms of magnitude of wrongless scale you, you actually got the problem wrong by so much you'd be retarded if it was any other common question its like saying what's 2+2 and you answer "snorkeling in 10 feet of shit while trying to perform auto fellatio on a cat while the olympics is on" or i guess its more like saying 7 million is the answer to 2+2 and then being like OH IT WAS 4 OOPs OH YOU BRAIN YOU DID IT AGAIN | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On May 15 2014 01:38 Requizen wrote: How? Atoms are made up of Electrons, Protons, and Neutrons. This is like 6th grade shit. That entire quiz was the stuff I learnt at the start of secondary school, I almost feel ashamed that I got one wrong | ||
|
Frudgey
Canada3367 Posts
 | ||
|
Dark_Chill
Canada3353 Posts
Fracking got me, and I thought that everything happening was a chemical reaction, probably confusing chemical reaction with reaction. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
canada man real dark horse | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On May 15 2014 01:38 Requizen wrote: How? Atoms are made up of Electrons, Protons, and Neutrons. This is like 6th grade shit. It's a pretty weird question though. It's not directly comparing things like an Electron to a Proton or Neutron it's instead comparing the collection of all 3 to one. I actually had to take some time on that question while having 2 years of varsity chemistry under my belt ;( On May 15 2014 01:49 Dark_Chill wrote: 11/13 Fracking got me, and I thought that everything happening was a chemical reaction, probably confusing chemical reaction with reaction. That's basically a trick question. Also silly to me. For someone that doesn't actively work in the field you may call a phase change a chemical reaction but know that it's only changing phase. So while you use the wrong terminology you still know what's going on. Don't see how it tests anything really besides not knowing correct terminology It really isn't testing your knowledge of science. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/98/WilliamAdama.jpg)
