EPTOn January 23 2015 20:59 zEEzz wrote:
no live report...
sad code s group.
no live report...
sad code s group.
If you dont have TL+ the LR thread is Low quality.
[Code S] Ro32 Group H Season 1 2015 - Page 17
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
RHoudini
Belgium3627 Posts
If you dont have TL+ the LR thread is Low quality. | ||
|
Blargh
United States2103 Posts
| ||
|
rotta
5616 Posts
On January 23 2015 21:00 RHoudini wrote: If you dont have TL+ the LR thread is Low quality. Oh snap! Poor Solar... | ||
|
Valikyr
Sweden2653 Posts
| ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
| ||
|
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
On January 23 2015 21:00 RHoudini wrote: If you dont have TL+ the LR thread is Low quality. Also consider getting TLO+ http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/tl-community/418629-tlo-announced | ||
|
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
On January 23 2015 21:00 royalroadweed wrote: He went up to flash level medivacs. Haha I was thinking the same thing during the game. | ||
|
SackOfWetMice
United States288 Posts
| ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5460 Posts
Action packed games like that make me not want Blizzard to change the amount of minerals per base in LOTV. Or if they do, make 4 have 750 mins and 4 have 2000+ so it's the same amount of minerals, but fewer workers needed per base (after a few minutes). | ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
On January 23 2015 20:59 Circumstance wrote: Poll: Recommend Winner's Match Game 2? ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (16) ★★★★- Highly recommended game (7) ★★★- Good game (2) ★- Do not see this game no matter what (0) ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 25 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winner's Match Game 2? (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what Poll: Recommend Winner's Match Game 3? ★★★★- Highly recommended game (5) ★★★- Good game (4) ★- Do not see this game no matter what (3) ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0) 12 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winner's Match Game 3? (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what | ||
|
chambertin
United States1704 Posts
ruhroh | ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On January 23 2015 21:01 SackOfWetMice wrote: Solar really did not play that well. Didn't mine any gas at that middle base, wtf? And should have mixed a few corruptors into his style like Dark does to combat those medivacs. Or just split better and don't waste all your banelings on marauders... Solar played very well, just lacked the creepspread. | ||
|
Penev
28528 Posts
| ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On January 23 2015 21:04 Penev wrote: Hmm, almost 20k "viewers" Alive Pixels | ||
|
SackOfWetMice
United States288 Posts
On January 23 2015 21:04 Big J wrote: Solar played very well, just lacked the creepspread. He played some instances very well, yes; others very poorly. I recall multiple engagements where he used his banelings poorly, one instance where he misrallied a bunch of banelings by an army of bio and gifted a bunch of them away, also didn't mine any gas from the middle base, also didn't play well with his mutas; never targeted medivacs. | ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
On January 23 2015 21:04 Big J wrote: Solar played very well, just lacked the creepspread. and you have to take in consideration the huge amount of pressure innovation did, it was insane | ||
|
SackOfWetMice
United States288 Posts
On January 23 2015 21:07 Makro wrote: and you have to take in consideration the huge amount of pressure innovation did, it was insane Yeah, I'm sure it's probably heart-pumping trying to play against INno in that kind of match. He did pull off a few pretty good moves; just think that he made a lot of mistakes. But no doubt those mistakes are nearly impossible to not make when playing someone of INno's caliber. | ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
| ||
|
Gowerly
United Kingdom916 Posts
| ||
|
Penev
28528 Posts
| ||
| ||
