EPTOn September 05 2014 19:55 bo1b wrote:
The point I'm arguing is that a list of names he's beaten says nothing about the quality of those games or if there were hilarious mistakes involved. Snute vs Flash comes to mind.
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2014 19:53 Glorfindel! wrote:
But Flash beating Parting, Zest and Huk is better than Flash beating Parting and Zest, right?
On September 05 2014 19:52 bo1b wrote:
Yes, flash beating huk is not as impressive as flashing beating parting. That's pretty basic logic.
On September 05 2014 19:52 Glorfindel! wrote:
Winning in GSL Round 16 is always good.
And winning vs a player who does not play good does not make his other games bad?
Or what logic am I not understanding. If Flash beats Huk the next tournament, it was not impressive beating Zest and Parting cause Huk is not as good?
On September 05 2014 19:50 bo1b wrote:
True vs Flash is now on the list in his latest streak of wins, to put it in perspective.
On September 05 2014 19:48 Glorfindel! wrote:
Does not every game when you win have faults from the opponent?
That quite much is a given for every SC2-game I have ever watched. The player who loses makes some hilarious fails, the one who makes the least wins the game....
On September 05 2014 19:46 bo1b wrote:
Having watched pretty much every one of those games the majority featured some hilarious fail from his opponents, and if you think I need to win a gsl to call someone being called a god (in a game which he's accomplished nothing overrated) then you're out of your mind.
On September 05 2014 19:45 Glorfindel! wrote:
How is a player with that win streak "over rated"?
What do you have to accomplish in Starcraft to be accepted as a top level player?
Check his match history, and please explain why anyone not should rate him high.
If you can do that, I perhaps can understand your logic.
Until then, you just look like a real bad hater.
On September 05 2014 19:43 bo1b wrote:
I don't hate flash, I think he's hideously over rated in sc2.
On September 05 2014 19:43 juvenal wrote:
[quote]
2 flash-hate posts per page is joke, keep it up please! Don't forget to post when drg gets raped too!
[quote]
2 flash-hate posts per page is joke, keep it up please! Don't forget to post when drg gets raped too!
I don't hate flash, I think he's hideously over rated in sc2.
How is a player with that win streak "over rated"?
What do you have to accomplish in Starcraft to be accepted as a top level player?
Check his match history, and please explain why anyone not should rate him high.
If you can do that, I perhaps can understand your logic.
Until then, you just look like a real bad hater.
Having watched pretty much every one of those games the majority featured some hilarious fail from his opponents, and if you think I need to win a gsl to call someone being called a god (in a game which he's accomplished nothing overrated) then you're out of your mind.
Does not every game when you win have faults from the opponent?
That quite much is a given for every SC2-game I have ever watched. The player who loses makes some hilarious fails, the one who makes the least wins the game....
True vs Flash is now on the list in his latest streak of wins, to put it in perspective.
Winning in GSL Round 16 is always good.
And winning vs a player who does not play good does not make his other games bad?
Or what logic am I not understanding. If Flash beats Huk the next tournament, it was not impressive beating Zest and Parting cause Huk is not as good?
Yes, flash beating huk is not as impressive as flashing beating parting. That's pretty basic logic.
But Flash beating Parting, Zest and Huk is better than Flash beating Parting and Zest, right?
The point I'm arguing is that a list of names he's beaten says nothing about the quality of those games or if there were hilarious mistakes involved. Snute vs Flash comes to mind.
drg vs genius comes to mind, bro
