EPT[IEM] Season IX - Toronto Day 2 - Page 17
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
SoSexy
Italy3725 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
| ||
|
Sakkreth
Lithuania1096 Posts
| ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On August 29 2014 22:28 Lorning wrote: Maybe we should make our own WCS point list, with actual rules Each year we get about 13-20 Premier events before Blizzcon. There are 3 seasons of WCS and maybe 2 global/kespa cups. Looking at the pure WCS point distibution Premier events all got 4k points each. WCS events get 10k each, but split into three different regions, meaning each WCS region gets 30k in WCS events and some of the top players get a shot at 14k more due to Kespa Cup/Global Cup. This means Premier foreigner events are holding up anywhere between 52k-80k are up for grabs compared to 104k in WCS (Though realistically any one player from any region can compete for only 30k-44k at the absolute best). This means that for the average player, foreign lans are weighted to be twice as important as WCS events. To make it even worse, WCS points in WCS events are weighted towards the champion as they want to seed the Champions into Blizcon, but because of that consistent players that can't go out to lans (Vortix, TRUE, soO, Maru, etc.) are all essentially at a massive disadvantage. This isn't even going into Tier 2 events, of which there can be anywhere between 5-15 per year. Which give another 3.5k of WCS points putting consistent performers in the main WCS events at a worse position. This isn't even going into the blatant disregard of guidelines or a standardized rules set across the board as to what event gets how many points. The most blatant example of this was Gfinity G3. Put as a Major event, it stil gives first place as many points as a winner of a Premier tournament like DH, IEM or MLG. On top of that 3/4 of the players were invited for a total pool of 12 players. Yet at the same time, a tournament like ECL and the TesLs have more qualified players than invited and get 1/2 the WCS points (or none in the case of ECL). Even tournaments similar to Gfinity in terms of qualified to invited players like LSC, Fragbite, or the Copenhagen games got half the points despite having almost the exact same ratio of qualified players to invigted players (or in the case of Fragbite 0 WCS points). Basically there is no unifying idea behind the allotment of WCS points. It's not giving a helping hand to local events or copenhagen games/ECL/Tesl probably would have gotten more. It's not trying to choose a best player like last year. It's not setting strict rules on what kind of basic structures we want WCS endorsed events to be. It doesn't particulalry favor players in the WCS main events beyond the champion. What the fuck are you trying to achieve by giving out WCS points? I actually can't tell. | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
Muffloe
Sweden6061 Posts
| ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
edit nvm 7 roaches | ||
|
Ketch
Netherlands7285 Posts
Edit: just not enough | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
| ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
| ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
| ||
|
Muffloe
Sweden6061 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
BlackCompany
Germany8388 Posts
Crazy that Huk almost won that | ||
|
Muffloe
Sweden6061 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
| ||
| ||
