EPTOn June 08 2014 08:05 Pino wrote:
That game is sooo much better
That game is sooo much better
Regardless of BW vs SC2 stuff that was one of the most one-sided games we've had today.
[HSC IX] Day 3 - Page 103
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Cheren
United States2911 Posts
Regardless of BW vs SC2 stuff that was one of the most one-sided games we've had today. | ||
|
norterrible
United States618 Posts
| ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
Okay, makes sense given the number of harvesters. When the players have 200 supply the armies must be ridiculous. | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:05 NonY wrote: yeah wasnt this showmatch dependent on people giving money to take? and none of it goes to the players? lol :o Take decided that they'd do the showmatch anyways, they weren't gonna get that many subs anyways. | ||
|
Cuce
Turkey1127 Posts
| ||
|
Kerence
Sweden1817 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:05 NonY wrote: yeah wasnt this showmatch dependent on people giving money to take? and none of it goes to the players? lol :o No, they canceled that because there was no way they were going to reach their goal. They just did it because so many people wanted it from what i heard. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32742 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:06 Boucot wrote: Okay, makes sense given the number of harvesters. When the players have 200 supply the armies must be ridiculous. But max 12 unit bindings meant controlling was a lot harder. | ||
|
Undead1993
Germany17651 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:05 NonY wrote: yeah wasnt this showmatch dependent on people giving money to take? and none of it goes to the players? lol :o mb the players are so kind and they do it for free? ever thought about that possibility? | ||
|
Penguinator
United States837 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:05 NonY wrote: yeah wasnt this showmatch dependent on people giving money to take? and none of it goes to the players? lol :o Do you really care that much? Holy shit. Look how much fun they're having just playing a Bo3 showmatch against each other. You don't always need to get paid for everything. | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:06 norterrible wrote: finally they are happy. i wonder why they are never smiling playing sc2 ;( Mmmm | ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:05 NonY wrote: yeah wasnt this showmatch dependent on people giving money to take? and none of it goes to the players? lol :o Players get a 25k tournament to play in | ||
|
Pino
1032 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:05 CruelZeratul wrote: It's a showmatch, go to lategame dudes, not this early stuff  NO RUSH 20 FFS!! | ||
|
Fanatic-Templar
Canada5819 Posts
| ||
|
usopsama
6502 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ZAUYdhb.jpg) So handsome. | ||
|
purakushi
United States3300 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:05 Undead1993 wrote: literally the slowest game ever It's not slow when you have many times the number of things to do compared to SC2. Edit: ^ thanks for the picture. warms my heart. BW is <3 | ||
|
aZealot
New Zealand5447 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:05 CruelZeratul wrote: It's a showmatch, go to lategame dudes, not this early stuff True, but it has been a long day. And JD has an early start tomorrow. I do miss the old proper fog of war. You had the feeling of actually exploring an unknown world with your probe scout. | ||
|
WTCO
United States646 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:06 norterrible wrote: finally they are happy. i wonder why they are never smiling playing sc2 ;( They are playing in a showmatch that doesn't matter. If this was an OSL I doubt they'd be smiling. | ||
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:08 purakushi wrote: It's not slow when you have many times the number of things to do compared to SC2. let's not make this a sc2 vs bw discussion please just enjoy the games. | ||
|
Pino
1032 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:06 Boucot wrote: Okay, makes sense given the number of harvesters. When the players have 200 supply the armies must be ridiculous. I can't remember a lot of games where i went to 200, except for BGH off | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
On June 08 2014 08:06 Boucot wrote: Okay, makes sense given the number of harvesters. When the players have 200 supply the armies must be ridiculous. big engagements are beautiful to watch. seeing zergs control max control armies is just disgustingly sick. | ||
| ||
