EPTOn March 25 2014 06:51 Darkhorse wrote:
THE BOUNTY HYUNTERS ARE SENT BACK FROM WHENCE THEY CAME
THE BOUNTY HYUNTERS ARE SENT BACK FROM WHENCE THEY CAME
Europe
Acer TeamStory Cup Season 3 Qualifier - Page 55
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
Europe | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
woot woot | ||
|
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:53 Boucot wrote: Holy what Should have prayed to Finland Protoss like the rest of us. | ||
|
Undead1993
Germany17651 Posts
| ||
|
Popkiller
3415 Posts
| ||
|
TotalBiscuit
United Kingdom5437 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:51 Socke wrote: "1.4 Cooperation A cooperation between two(2) teams is allowed. They will handled exactly like a stand alone team. e.g. Axiom-Acer in GSTL The name of a cooperation have to make sure that both team names are included." Since it says teams in the rulebook, not organisations one might argue that this rule intends not to enable teams to partner with other organizations (or groups of) players. But the admins who created the rules allowed teams to partner with organisations when the lineups were communicated, so it seems to me that with the quoted excerpt they intended to allow 2 organisations, not teams to partner. So its not against the rules id say. Why are you getting upset about how the Admins are interpreting their rules prior to the start of a tournament? How can it be against the spirit of the competition to allow 1 player from another team to participate, and fully in the spirit of the competition to include 2? That should be obvious. Including one player is exactly the same as including one player under the Joker rule, which was abolished after a lot of disagreement from team owners and rightfully so. There is no effective difference. I am annoyed that the admins chose to interpret the rules in such a way that surprised other teams and caught them off guard during the qualifier and also did not mention these "cooperations" to any of the participating teams who were already qualified from the last season. I am also annoyed that the admins then made excuses up to and including claiming that management agencies were somehow teams, which has never been held to be true (and with good reason). Anyway, at this point it does not matter. All the teams who looked to take this route were knocked out, so the only disagreement I have remaining at this point is the fact that Empire-Fnatic did not have to requalify when last season they played under Empire-Ence and were effectively a completely different team. | ||
|
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:54 Popkiller wrote: Mvp probably walked past all of them and shook his head. Don't touch me with your dirty non 3-gsl winning hands. | ||
|
ssxsilver
United States4409 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:54 Popkiller wrote: Mvp probably walked past all of them and shook his head. You must have missed Fight Night! | ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
Don't get cocky now Patience/Golden/Strelok/Revenge could pull the upset. Not likely but possible  | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:51 Socke wrote: "1.4 Cooperation A cooperation between two(2) teams is allowed. They will handled exactly like a stand alone team. e.g. Axiom-Acer in GSTL The name of a cooperation have to make sure that both team names are included." Since it says teams in the rulebook, not organisations one might argue that this rule intends not to enable teams to partner with other organizations (or groups of) players. But the admins who created the rules allowed teams to partner with organisations when the lineups were communicated, so it seems to me that with the quoted excerpt they intended to allow 2 organisations, not teams to partner. So its not against the rules id say. Why are you getting upset about how the Admins are interpreting their rules prior to the start of a tournament? How can it be against the spirit of the competition to allow 1 player from another team to participate, and fully in the spirit of the competition to include 2? what part of "breaking the spirit of the rules" don't you understand? | ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:55 Darkhorse wrote: Don't get cocky now Patience/Golden/Strelok/Revenge could pull the upset. Not likely but possible I got the shot into the blue right, I'm happy. Also the drama part was thankfully eliminated by our finnish overlords | ||
|
Vesimias
Finland135 Posts
| ||
|
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:54 stuchiu wrote: Don't touch me with your dirty non 3-gsl winning hands. So only Nestea can touch him? Mvp won 4. | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:51 Socke wrote: "1.4 Cooperation A cooperation between two(2) teams is allowed. They will handled exactly like a stand alone team. e.g. Axiom-Acer in GSTL The name of a cooperation have to make sure that both team names are included." Since it says teams in the rulebook, not organisations one might argue that this rule intends not to enable teams to partner with other organizations (or groups of) players. But the admins who created the rules allowed teams to partner with organisations when the lineups were communicated, so it seems to me that with the quoted excerpt they intended to allow 2 organisations, not teams to partner. So its not against the rules id say. Why are you getting upset about how the Admins are interpreting their rules prior to the start of a tournament? How can it be against the spirit of the competition to allow 1 player from another team to participate, and fully in the spirit of the competition to include 2? Because people are manipulating this rule specifically to get a Joker even when the Joker rule was removed, and the admins accepted (because their rules weren't airtight) despite other teams not using a Joker due to the removal of that rule, which is unfair towards them, since they could also have manipulated this rule similarly. | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:52 VeNoM HaZ Skill wrote: MC is the Korean A-team? Oh man it's 2011 again! Time to buy Netflix and Chipotle stock. I pity the fools that ecounters Welmu | ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
| ||
|
Serinox
Germany5224 Posts
Poor BabyK D: | ||
|
Undead1993
Germany17651 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:59 Makro wrote: I checked the qualifiers on liquipedia, foreigners overall did a good job especially the swiss ones | ||
|
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
Correct. | ||
| ||
impressive
