|
On June 29 2013 20:26 gingerfluffmuff wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2013 19:52 Xoronius wrote:On June 29 2013 16:39 BackSideAttack wrote:On June 29 2013 16:26 Xoronius wrote:On June 29 2013 16:22 ChApFoU wrote:
Are the brackets randomly generated ? If that's the case, koreans have a pretty shitty luck..... I´d say Jaedong and HerO have pretty good luck. Polt as well. Ofc. I know what you´re saying ( brackets 3,4 and 7 are more stacked than all others), but I don´t see any pattern here, which would express a manipulation from MLG´s side; seems about randomized for me, with seeding for high MLG finishes in the past. I don't agree with the seeding from past performance depending on the situation. I definitely don't agree that Huk should be seeded highly for doing well several years ago. I would have preferred that they take current skill into consideration, or at the very least not take into consider results from over a year ago. It kind of sucks that Stats and Dear have to meet so early when Naniwa and Huk and Polt basically have foreigner only brackets. Also how did Jaedong get such a high seed when he hasn't performed well or even been at past MLGs. They must've taken non-MLG results into consideration as well. I did´nt say, that I agree with the seeding, just saying, that that was probably the way it was done. The problem is though, that (Captain obvious incoming) doing a good seeding is actually really hard neither Stats nor Dear has any solo-achievments or anything measurable to really rate them (Like WCS points, both are sitting at 0), we only know, that they are good, because we see them in a Team-league. Meanwhile Naniwa; Jaedong and HerO (the three highest ranked players at the tournery) are sitting on 2650/900/800 points already and thus get pretty easy brackets (It could actually just be a seeding on WCS points, now, that I think of it, the only anomaly in this case would be soO/Hyun both having more points than anyone in bracket 2). In case the seeding was random, it is ok i guess. They won this: easiest qualifier ever. In my eyes the winner of MLG was chosen with this tournament.
Wow... that qualifier.... I wonder what would happen if you put everyone in the first round of that qual against everyone in the first round of this MLG. How many games would the MLG side win? 1-2? Not trying to be a dick that qual just seems about 1000x more stacked than the actual tourney, which is strange.
|
forgot Coach Park in the second poll
|
|
|
On June 29 2013 21:27 DamnCats wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2013 20:26 gingerfluffmuff wrote:On June 29 2013 19:52 Xoronius wrote:On June 29 2013 16:39 BackSideAttack wrote:On June 29 2013 16:26 Xoronius wrote:On June 29 2013 16:22 ChApFoU wrote:
Are the brackets randomly generated ? If that's the case, koreans have a pretty shitty luck..... I´d say Jaedong and HerO have pretty good luck. Polt as well. Ofc. I know what you´re saying ( brackets 3,4 and 7 are more stacked than all others), but I don´t see any pattern here, which would express a manipulation from MLG´s side; seems about randomized for me, with seeding for high MLG finishes in the past. I don't agree with the seeding from past performance depending on the situation. I definitely don't agree that Huk should be seeded highly for doing well several years ago. I would have preferred that they take current skill into consideration, or at the very least not take into consider results from over a year ago. It kind of sucks that Stats and Dear have to meet so early when Naniwa and Huk and Polt basically have foreigner only brackets. Also how did Jaedong get such a high seed when he hasn't performed well or even been at past MLGs. They must've taken non-MLG results into consideration as well. I did´nt say, that I agree with the seeding, just saying, that that was probably the way it was done. The problem is though, that (Captain obvious incoming) doing a good seeding is actually really hard neither Stats nor Dear has any solo-achievments or anything measurable to really rate them (Like WCS points, both are sitting at 0), we only know, that they are good, because we see them in a Team-league. Meanwhile Naniwa; Jaedong and HerO (the three highest ranked players at the tournery) are sitting on 2650/900/800 points already and thus get pretty easy brackets (It could actually just be a seeding on WCS points, now, that I think of it, the only anomaly in this case would be soO/Hyun both having more points than anyone in bracket 2). In case the seeding was random, it is ok i guess. They won this: easiest qualifier ever. In my eyes the winner of MLG was chosen with this tournament. Wow... that qualifier.... I wonder what would happen if you put everyone in the first round of that qual against everyone in the first round of this MLG. How many games would the MLG side win? 1-2? Not trying to be a dick that qual just seems about 1000x more stacked than the actual tourney, which is strange.
Not strange, think of it has WCS Korea vs WCS Finals 
|
Just checked the results. Thorzain lost 2-0 to KawaiiRice, who was playing RANDOM? Seriously?
Was that casted? We got any vods? Can anyone sum up the games?
|
|
|
On June 29 2013 21:27 DamnCats wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2013 20:26 gingerfluffmuff wrote:On June 29 2013 19:52 Xoronius wrote:On June 29 2013 16:39 BackSideAttack wrote:On June 29 2013 16:26 Xoronius wrote:On June 29 2013 16:22 ChApFoU wrote:
Are the brackets randomly generated ? If that's the case, koreans have a pretty shitty luck..... I´d say Jaedong and HerO have pretty good luck. Polt as well. Ofc. I know what you´re saying ( brackets 3,4 and 7 are more stacked than all others), but I don´t see any pattern here, which would express a manipulation from MLG´s side; seems about randomized for me, with seeding for high MLG finishes in the past. I don't agree with the seeding from past performance depending on the situation. I definitely don't agree that Huk should be seeded highly for doing well several years ago. I would have preferred that they take current skill into consideration, or at the very least not take into consider results from over a year ago. It kind of sucks that Stats and Dear have to meet so early when Naniwa and Huk and Polt basically have foreigner only brackets. Also how did Jaedong get such a high seed when he hasn't performed well or even been at past MLGs. They must've taken non-MLG results into consideration as well. I did´nt say, that I agree with the seeding, just saying, that that was probably the way it was done. The problem is though, that (Captain obvious incoming) doing a good seeding is actually really hard neither Stats nor Dear has any solo-achievments or anything measurable to really rate them (Like WCS points, both are sitting at 0), we only know, that they are good, because we see them in a Team-league. Meanwhile Naniwa; Jaedong and HerO (the three highest ranked players at the tournery) are sitting on 2650/900/800 points already and thus get pretty easy brackets (It could actually just be a seeding on WCS points, now, that I think of it, the only anomaly in this case would be soO/Hyun both having more points than anyone in bracket 2). In case the seeding was random, it is ok i guess. They won this: easiest qualifier ever. In my eyes the winner of MLG was chosen with this tournament. Wow... that qualifier.... I wonder what would happen if you put everyone in the first round of that qual against everyone in the first round of this MLG. How many games would the MLG side win? 1-2? Not trying to be a dick that qual just seems about 1000x more stacked than the actual tourney, which is strange.
Not that surprising, WCS KR which is now sort of a qualifier is way more stacked than the actual global finals too.
|
On June 29 2013 22:44 HBmaKro wrote:
wheres the day 9 stream?
He's not a community streamer, he's hired for the main stream.
|
oh dear just check the results, didnt think coach park will loose frst round vs a american noname
|
Did coach Park play? What's his id.
|
and where is the main day 9 stream? link ?
|
oh dear just check the results, didnt think coach park will loose frst round vs a american noname
Did coach Park play? What's his id.
He lost against bubbles by cannon rush
|
On June 29 2013 23:13 qcHanHan wrote:
PARTIIIIIIIIIING!
I like PartinG too, but I think his chance of winning this tourney is rather small...
|
|
|
Why is there such an echo on the cast?
Are they pulling the audio from out in the audience?
|
|
|
No free VoDs for this, right?
|
TheStC seemed to has awful luck with the bracket all the times =(
|
|
|
awesome coverage so far really like all the options at this MLG
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
