On June 23 2013 02:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
Don't get me wrong, Stephano is still one of the better non-koreans. Maybe I'm just inclined to be skeptical because his fanboys are so annoying. Because "LOL" is such a good argument for why he's "definitively better." Looking at their current form based on recent tournaments, Stephano has no clear advantage.
Show nested quote +
On June 23 2013 02:28 revel8 wrote:
Stephano is definitively better than TLO. If you disagree, then LOL
On June 23 2013 02:26 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
You misunderstand my post - nowhere did I say that TLO is better than Stephano. My post is in response to someone claiming that Lucifron and Stephano are better. In reality, it would be difficult to compare TLO and Stephano, and I don't think you can say one is definitively better than the other.
On June 23 2013 02:17 stuchiu wrote:
When talking about what player is better than the other, head-to-head probably isn't the best way to go about it. TLO beat Lucifron a few times, but lost 0-3 to MVP. Conversely Lucifron beat MVP 2-0 when they met. And you can't say, oh if he got a bit luckier in brackets he could have gone farther, you can literally say the same thing about anyone. If Lucifron didn't get hit by a coin, he could have won Dreamhack.
On June 23 2013 02:10 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
I'm referring to WCSU EU for lucifron because TLO and lucifron played each other head to head in that tournament. TLO and Stephano did not. So the only comparison for them at WCS EU would be their placements, but like I explained, if their bracket positions had been switched, TLO could have easily been in finals while Stephano would have been the one knocked out in the ro8, an unfortunate outcome of unlucky bracket placement (especially given the fact that they both won 1st in their groups).
On June 23 2013 02:06 stuchiu wrote:
You're counting WCS EU for TLO when it comes to beating lucifron, but discounting WCS EU when talking about Stephano getting to the finals.
On June 23 2013 02:05 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
Lucifron is awesome, but you can't say that Lucifron is better, TLOs beaten him at least in 3 different series when they've run into each other, and even though your criteria for being considered best is getting to finals, Lucifron has not made the finals of a premier tournament. And although Stephano has also won against TLO in the past, TLO had the upper hand in their most recent encounter, winning against him in their group at WCS Finals. Stephano also hasn't even gotten close to the finals of a premier tournament lately unless you count WCS EU, but the advantage over TLO there was the reuslt of an unlucky bracket, since TLO got paired with the eventual champion in the ro8 (who Stephano also lost to). TLO could have beaten anyone else in that top 8 to make it to the finals.
On June 23 2013 01:38 _SpiRaL_ wrote:
TLO isn't the best yet, Lucifron and Stephano still better, Snute on a similar level. But he needs to go from consistent RO8 to actually getting to finals to be considered best. Consistency is overrated
.
TLO isn't the best yet, Lucifron and Stephano still better, Snute on a similar level. But he needs to go from consistent RO8 to actually getting to finals to be considered best. Consistency is overrated
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
Lucifron is awesome, but you can't say that Lucifron is better, TLOs beaten him at least in 3 different series when they've run into each other, and even though your criteria for being considered best is getting to finals, Lucifron has not made the finals of a premier tournament. And although Stephano has also won against TLO in the past, TLO had the upper hand in their most recent encounter, winning against him in their group at WCS Finals. Stephano also hasn't even gotten close to the finals of a premier tournament lately unless you count WCS EU, but the advantage over TLO there was the reuslt of an unlucky bracket, since TLO got paired with the eventual champion in the ro8 (who Stephano also lost to). TLO could have beaten anyone else in that top 8 to make it to the finals.
You're counting WCS EU for TLO when it comes to beating lucifron, but discounting WCS EU when talking about Stephano getting to the finals.
I'm referring to WCSU EU for lucifron because TLO and lucifron played each other head to head in that tournament. TLO and Stephano did not. So the only comparison for them at WCS EU would be their placements, but like I explained, if their bracket positions had been switched, TLO could have easily been in finals while Stephano would have been the one knocked out in the ro8, an unfortunate outcome of unlucky bracket placement (especially given the fact that they both won 1st in their groups).
When talking about what player is better than the other, head-to-head probably isn't the best way to go about it. TLO beat Lucifron a few times, but lost 0-3 to MVP. Conversely Lucifron beat MVP 2-0 when they met. And you can't say, oh if he got a bit luckier in brackets he could have gone farther, you can literally say the same thing about anyone. If Lucifron didn't get hit by a coin, he could have won Dreamhack.
You misunderstand my post - nowhere did I say that TLO is better than Stephano. My post is in response to someone claiming that Lucifron and Stephano are better. In reality, it would be difficult to compare TLO and Stephano, and I don't think you can say one is definitively better than the other.
Stephano is definitively better than TLO. If you disagree, then LOL
Don't get me wrong, Stephano is still one of the better non-koreans. Maybe I'm just inclined to be skeptical because his fanboys are so annoying. Because "LOL" is such a good argument for why he's "definitively better." Looking at their current form based on recent tournaments, Stephano has no clear advantage.
LOL isn't a valid argument?