|
On January 19 2013 02:31 00Visor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2013 02:27 Chaosu wrote:On January 19 2013 02:24 00Visor wrote:On January 19 2013 02:22 Chaosu wrote:On January 19 2013 02:16 00Visor wrote:On January 19 2013 02:13 Chaosu wrote:On January 19 2013 02:05 00Visor wrote:On January 19 2013 02:03 eurTsItniH wrote: How exactly is it a bad system if the one with the most map wins moves on? You make it sound like it is all unusual, but infact it is usually the way same in football (map wins=goals in this case). In football it makes sense, because you stimulate the teams to play offensive because you reward more total goals. This doesnt apply to map wins, so it doesnt make sense there. Why, I am asking why you don't stimulate the players to take one game off an opponent even when you're losing a series? No. Thats already stimulated, because players would have a worse map difference if they wouldnt take that game. Counting total map wins changes nothing there. Winning in close series is better than losing in close series. Losing in close series is better than being owned. What doesn't make sence here to you? It is already better because you get a better map difference. (you are arguing to count total map wins which changes nothing in that regard) Sorry? Grubby had 7 wins and Moonglade 6, isn't it based on total map wins and you're arguing it should be based on ratio instead? Yes. Maybe you think carefully through what I explained. Don't know if I can say it better. I agree what you said about ratio and that it also encourages to win more games _but_ I think that if we go from here: how to encourage players to win as many games as possible? It's not winratio but most wins that comes as a natural answer. That's my opinion.
|
On January 19 2013 02:33 2muchSWAG wrote: Typical Nerchio, doing an all in against his superior. Yes Nerchio is a good player but he can't surpass the might that is Yoda, who is supposedly the best IM player according Mvp
Lol wut
|
very wp nerchio! from start to the end.
|
|
he lost after the 11/11 no point in staying
|
Haha, NERD CHIO, love that banner.
Great game, looks like Nerchio is going to crush this event.
|
"one, two maybe three" maybe four maybe five!
|
Nerchio completely outplaying Yoda in this game
|
And First takes an easy 2-0 against VortiX
|
|
On January 19 2013 02:33 2muchSWAG wrote: Typical Nerchio, doing an all in against his superior. Yes Nerchio is a good player but he can't surpass the might that is Yoda, who is supposedly the best IM player according Mvp
lol????
|
On January 19 2013 02:36 Benjamin99 wrote: Nerchio completely outplaying Yoda in this game can't tell if serious or troll. please be troll. for the sake of my sanity
|
Nerchio is for sure one of the most talented players out there. Such good decision making and unit control.
The guy doesn't even use camera hotkeys, and uses only 3 control groups...
|
Austria24417 Posts
Yoda tried proxy 2 rax, didn't work. The game ended there.
|
First has worked on his PvZ it seems. :p
|
So we are going to watch again a one of the worst 11/11 we had seen since Happy.
|
On January 19 2013 02:36 scgaming4 wrote: he lost after the 11/11 no point in staying
He stayed because he expected Nerchio to play correctly, not do a random all in. If Nerchio had played correctly, Yoda would have out macro'd him easily with like 6 drops at the same time and a push at the 4th
|
On January 19 2013 02:37 DarkLordOlli wrote: Yoda tried proxy 2 rax, didn't work. The game ended there.
|
On January 19 2013 02:35 mijellin wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2013 02:33 2muchSWAG wrote: Typical Nerchio, doing an all in against his superior. Yes Nerchio is a good player but he can't surpass the might that is Yoda, who is supposedly the best IM player according Mvp Lol wut sounds like regular twitch chat guy
|
On January 19 2013 02:36 scgaming4 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2013 02:36 Benjamin99 wrote: Nerchio completely outplaying Yoda in this game can't tell if serious or troll. please be troll. for the sake of my sanity I think the cliched phrase indicates trolling, be sane sir, be sane.
|
|
|
|