EPTOn October 16 2012 08:48 PhoenixVoid wrote:
First game, yes. Second game, an early Ling attack.
First game, yes. Second game, an early Ling attack.
First game was macro, second roach rush, third was a 6-8 pool, I didn't see it at the start
[IPL] FC37: HyuN vs Sea - Page 9
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
WarrickHunt
United Kingdom393 Posts
First game was macro, second roach rush, third was a 6-8 pool, I didn't see it at the start | ||
|
ref4
2933 Posts
oh and you cannot not wall off vs him | ||
|
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
| ||
|
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
On October 16 2012 08:51 WarrickHunt wrote: First game was macro, second roach rush, third was a 6-8 pool, I didn't see it at the start If it started with a roach rush it's not a macro game. Anyone can win with a massive early game advantage. | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10344 Posts
 | ||
|
Zenbrez
Canada5973 Posts
On October 16 2012 02:34 HolydaKing wrote: Guys it's not like Sea started with SC2 since he joined TL. Just look how good the other PL guys are performing at the moment, it's quite possible for him to win. I wouldn't overrate it if he loses a lot on stream. The other 9 players that Hyun thrashed weren't new to SC2 either. What has happened so far here hasn't been pretty. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32742 Posts
On October 16 2012 08:53 FreudianTrip wrote: ROFL. Every game I watch of this Fight Club it's just Hyun cheesing a Terran. >implying RR'ing is cheesing | ||
|
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
Fuck yes. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32742 Posts
Or at least prepare with a Hellion/Marauder push ready to respond and counterattack. | ||
|
geokilla
Canada8244 Posts
| ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
On October 16 2012 08:51 Grumbels wrote: They must have known Sea couldn't have taken HyuN, kinda silly they chose him for this week. First priority needs to be to get rid of HyuN and only then send out popular players like Sea. Not necessarily get rid of him, but at this point they should at least send players who can be considered a very serious threat to him. Sea isn't. | ||
|
Acer1791
Germany182 Posts
| ||
|
WarrickHunt
United Kingdom393 Posts
On October 16 2012 08:53 FreudianTrip wrote: If it started with a roach rush it's not a macro game. Anyone can win with a massive early game advantage. No, It is, I think you're wrong, if it still goes to late game, then its a macro game, same as if terran goes for 2 rax but it doesn't kill zerg but it kills the hatch its still a macro game if it gets to hive tech etc | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
| ||
|
Sumahi
Guam5609 Posts
| ||
|
goswser
United States3548 Posts
On October 16 2012 08:53 FreudianTrip wrote: If it started with a roach rush it's not a macro game. Anyone can win with a massive early game advantage. So in your definition of a macro game zerg can't attack terran before 15 minutes? | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32742 Posts
| ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
On October 16 2012 09:01 CosmicSpiral wrote: Macro games =/= NR15 games It's actually NR10, you have to harass zerg. | ||
|
Mystgun
Hong Kong311 Posts
| ||
|
ref4
2933 Posts
| ||
| ||
