|
On July 16 2012 07:15 entropius wrote:
Late game PvZ is ... idiotic. Who cares if it's "balanced" or not -- it's just a crapshoot. Sometimes Zerg wins when Protoss doesn't manage to vortex them out, sometimes Zerg loses when Protoss hits vortex, but it is ridiculous in a game where players play at ~200 APM for only two of those actions (select mothership, cast vortex) to decide the game.
Design fail. Blizzard ought to remove the mothership from the game and then give Protoss whatever tools they need to fight brood lord/infestor in a straight-up fight.
Well gee, hmm... isn't that why in HotS, Tempests will come into play and vortex no longer works vs air?
|
United States97276 Posts
On July 16 2012 07:17 ItsMeDomLee wrote:
Wait what? This is a Bo7? Why is a 3rd place decider match a Bo7?
They made both semis, 3rd place, and finals all bo7. They heard we all really love PvZ so they wanted to give us as many games as possible
|
On July 16 2012 07:17 ItsMeDomLee wrote:
Wait what? This is a Bo7? Why is a 3rd place decider match a Bo7?
Semi finals were Bo7 as well. Why not? They only had 8 players for 2 days.
|
On July 16 2012 07:17 ItsMeDomLee wrote:
Wait what? This is a Bo7? Why is a 3rd place decider match a Bo7?
Semis were bo7 too. Why wouldn't the 3rd place match be at least the same?
|
On July 16 2012 07:17 ItsMeDomLee wrote:
Wait what? This is a Bo7? Why is a 3rd place decider match a Bo7?
Why not? the semi's were Bo7
|
This must be such a hard defeat for Ret, probably crushed now.
|
On July 16 2012 07:16 the`postman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 16 2012 07:15 ThePhan2m wrote:
why didnt ret just wait??? such a bad way to go out. how hard is it spread your army?? vortex is so obvious..... You can't just let the protoss get to his archon/carrier/collosi death ball, gotta push out at some point.
plus, the protoss will always be more cost efficient than the zerg. so if you let him mine out his half of the map and you do yours, you're in quite some trouble.
|
On July 16 2012 07:17 dreamseller wrote:Show nested quote +On July 16 2012 07:16 babybell wrote:
Anyone else feeling sick from too much PvZ...? yeah i've been vomiting all over my computers all day. it's getting costly
Don't forget you can just put your keyboard in the dishwasher 
|
fucking cat just threw up over my monitor
|
I bet Ret 6 pools the last game... must be so on tilt by now :<
|
MC is trolling. No conclusions to be taken out of this game. Also it was really boring.
|
man ret alway lose those type of games..sadface =(
|
On July 16 2012 07:17 Tewks44 wrote:
that game was totally awesome, I don't know what some of you people are smoking.
Seriously, some of you guys will complain about anything.
Well they maxed on 15minute and were positioning for 15 min and then engaged, the last 2 minuts were interesting :f
|
Twitch please get new ads
|
On July 16 2012 07:17 Lunchador wrote:Show nested quote +On July 16 2012 07:15 entropius wrote:
Late game PvZ is ... idiotic. Who cares if it's "balanced" or not -- it's just a crapshoot. Sometimes Zerg wins when Protoss doesn't manage to vortex them out, sometimes Zerg loses when Protoss hits vortex, but it is ridiculous in a game where players play at ~200 APM for only two of those actions (select mothership, cast vortex) to decide the game.
Design fail. Blizzard ought to remove the mothership from the game and then give Protoss whatever tools they need to fight brood lord/infestor in a straight-up fight. Well gee, hmm... isn't that why in HotS, Tempests will come into play and vortex no longer works vs air?
Two years late. 
|
I miss terran 
|
That tune reminds me of the good old days of Jean Michel Jarre.
|
On July 16 2012 07:16 KillerSOS wrote:
GG toilet too strong
Not like MC was 80 supply ahead with 11k 6k resources in bank...if it wasn't for that toilet, he would have surely have hard time...
|
On July 16 2012 07:01 yeint wrote:Show nested quote +On July 16 2012 06:59 Deadeight wrote:On July 16 2012 06:58 Dosey wrote:On July 16 2012 06:57 BBMorti wrote:On July 16 2012 06:50 Dosey wrote:On July 16 2012 06:48 Kazeshini wrote:On July 16 2012 06:47 Daray wrote:On July 16 2012 06:46 Kazeshini wrote:On July 16 2012 06:44 McFeser wrote:On July 16 2012 06:43 niteReloaded wrote:
The odds on MC were 1.376, which is super value bet IMO. I only put 20€, maybe should've done more. Where? And the odds should have been better. http://www.pinnaclesports.com/ you can bet there for those games People from US can't though Is gambling illegal in the US ? I mean they have las vegas O.o UIGEA... Reason why we can't really play online poker in the states. The land of the free >.< The land of the greedy. They weren't cashing in on it, so they outlawed it. -_- Lobbyists push for it so that brick and mortar casinos benefit? No, they don't want their citizens gambling away money to offshore organizations that don't get taxed by the US. The same is true for a lot of EU countries.
If it were as simple as it being an offshore/onshore problem, then there would be licensed online gambling sites in the US by now (UIGEA passed nearly six years ago).
In this particular case, the UIGEA (which did not change the legal status of any forms of gambling) isn't as relevant as the Wire Act of 1961 (prohibiting interstate sports betting) and the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (effectively outlawed sports betting in 46 states [horses, dogs, and jai alai excluded]).
|
a 4-0 would help for the schedule's sake
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
