EPTOn April 18 2012 18:17 Boiler Bandsman wrote:
WE WANT LAN!
/too soon?
WE WANT LAN!
/too soon?
Too late.
[Code S] Ro16 2012 GSL Season 2 Group A - Page 16
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
Too late. | ||
|
Turbogangsta
Australia319 Posts
| ||
|
Kiyo.
United States2284 Posts
On April 18 2012 18:17 The KY wrote: Man I really hope Virus doesn't do a Polt/Jjjakji and just out of nowhere smash his way to the finals. I liked it when Jjakji did it but otherwise I hate that -_- Dat pause. What? So it's only okay when it's people you like? | ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
On April 18 2012 18:17 MCDayC wrote: Rofl, nani, never change. What? He obviously has some kind of keyboard/mouse problem. You expect him to just play like that? | ||
|
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
| ||
|
_Darwin_
United States2374 Posts
| ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
Chriscras
Korea (South)2812 Posts
| ||
|
Williammm
Australia908 Posts
| ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
| ||
|
Sareth
Germany1008 Posts
On April 18 2012 18:17 hifriend wrote: Nani < Genius Genius > Virus Genius > Supernova Nani < Genius Genius > Genius Dafuq? Genius beating Genius? no way, Genius to strong. | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37069 Posts
On April 18 2012 18:17 gedatsu wrote: Game rating system should have the following system: Amazing Good Bad and only those three options. problem with the last system is that there was no distinction between a good game and the best game ever. there was also no clear rule of when to vote "if you have time". a point/star system suffers from assigning arbitrary numerical values. people will have wildly different ideas of what qualifies as a 5/5 star game: some say that only the absolutely perfect game can get 5, while others will think that "a great game" deserves full score. if you don't believe me; there used to be point rankings in the summary articles on the front page, go and check them out and see how many you agree with. amazing/good/bad solves all of these problems. What constitutes amazing and good? | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
WE WANT LAN! /sarcasm | ||
|
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
| ||
|
Lasbike
France2888 Posts
| ||
|
omegaslast
223 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On April 18 2012 18:18 Logros wrote: What? He obviously has some kind of keyboard/mouse problem. You expect him to just play like that? I dunno, it just always seems like he has problems, no big deal. Also, GENIUS GOT ROBBED?!?!? HIS GAME CLEARLY! | ||
|
zefreak
United States2731 Posts
On April 18 2012 18:17 gedatsu wrote: Game rating system should have the following system: Amazing Good Bad and only those three options. problem with the last system is that there was no distinction between a good game and the best game ever. there was also no clear rule of when to vote "if you have time". a point/star system suffers from assigning arbitrary numerical values. people will have wildly different ideas of what qualifies as a 5/5 star game: some say that only the absolutely perfect game can get 5, while others will think that "a great game" deserves full score. if you don't believe me; there used to be point rankings in the summary articles on the front page, go and check them out and see how many you agree with. amazing/good/bad solves all of these problems. People have wildly different ideas of what qualifies as amazing, good and bad as well. These terms are just as subjective and arbitrary as 1,2,3, or 4 stars. | ||
|
Netsky
Australia1155 Posts
| ||
| ||
