EPT
[IEM] World - Day 4 @ CeBIT - Page 124
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
WArped
United Kingdom4845 Posts
| ||
|
Rassy
Netherlands2308 Posts
 | ||
Destructicon
4713 Posts
| ||
|
Zealot Orgy
United Kingdom537 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:39 jmbthirteen wrote: I dont think Stephano wants to go back to Korea. He will go back to Korea but not to play the GSL. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45437 Posts
Really? MC is much more of a nerdballer than Feast. In the grandfinals, cannon rushing, best control and execution, etc. | ||
|
altered
Switzerland646 Posts
| ||
|
ThatGuy89
United Kingdom1968 Posts
so glad that MC put feast in his place. All these people saying feast best PvP can gtfo now thanks gonna be an awesome final, gogo puma gogo MC | ||
|
BlackGosu
Canada1046 Posts
| ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
Yeah, I would vote for MC, but he already got the award earlier in some IEM, it'd be boring if he took it every time he attends, so I have to go with Feast. | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:39 Femari wrote: I think it's more likely that Polt and Stephano get it to be honest. I've been thinking about it, and especially after today, I think Puma deserves that seed more than Polt. He's won both seasons of NASL, an IEM and is in the finals of the WC, got second at Dreamhack and 3rd at Assembly. His performance is just as good as Polt, but he has a longer record of high performance, and he has beaten better players in these foreign tournaments (just beating MMA, beating DRG at Dreamhack, MC twice, etc). Furthermore, Puma is a guy who unfortunately has never participated in the GSL yet, whereas Polt has just fallen out. I think Puma should be ahead of Polt, because of these factors, and because I feel that he was passed over last season as well. | ||
|
Zealot Orgy
United Kingdom537 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:47 Bagration wrote: You might be thinking about IEM Cologne. NASL S1 finals were some of the most impressive games of TvP I had seen. Puma and MC both played amazingly. Yes, but it was still the GOMTvT era, where all you needed to do to get seeded in next season's codeS was to go 1W-2L in the RO32, which lead to tons of crappy players (asd, Virus, Ensare was the trinity of disgrace in particular) to stay in codeS for ages just by cheesing P and Z players, which lead to the developement of various different builds ( (1/1/1, 2port banshee, bitbybit) very hard to stop if you aren't in a mirror. Now that the 1/1/1 era is over he probably won't be able to lay hands on MC. | ||
|
Destructicon
4713 Posts
If you lose to cheese it's your own damn fault, learn to scout or interpret what you scouted better, because this isn't going a way, its part of the game. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:51 altered wrote: Whats all the hate on puma because he did 111 a couple times? I mean MC isnt a saint either when it comes to abusive/cheesy strategys. And this is part of the game its not like he cheated. haha so true. Is there a player who all ins more than MC? And its not bad either. You need to have diverse play. MVP will do whatever he wants against you and has put up the most dominating streak of sc2 to date. | ||
|
johnny123
521 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:44 Sakray wrote: Yeah, I also remember the NASL S1 final, where Puma won a game that he didn't deserved to, and some other final against MC where it was a 1/1/1 fest. Iirc most of Puma's matches against MC were just 1/1/1, so, I hope this time he's gonna play standard (but I want MC to win) this is a joke, i watched them all and this is not true -NASL season 1 puma beat MC with absolutely no 1/1/1, he beat him all games in macro fashion using marines/marauders/medicvacs and ghosts. His game style was marine heavy, Artosis always talks about this when hes talking about puma vs toss and how puma is really reliant on ghosts emp because hes so marine heavy. -The next time Puma and MC meet was in final of IEM right after season 1 of nasl. Puma beat MC in rather dominating fashion. Only the very last game on Xel Naga caverns did puma do 1/1/1 to win the final game of the tournament, All the other games did not involve any 1/1/1. They have meet twice, And in about 8 or 9 games they played puma has 1/1/1 against MC 1 single game. Yet people like you just come here saying all he can do is 1/1/1 and sucks. What a joke. | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:53 Zealot Orgy wrote: Yes, but it was still the GOMTvT era, where all you needed to do get seeded in next season's codeS was to go 1W-2L in the RO32, which lead to tons of crappy players (asd, Virus, Ensare was the trinity of disgrace in particular) to stay in codeS for ages just by cheesing (1/1/1, 2port banshee, bitbybit) P and Z players. Now that the 1/1/1 era is over he probably won't be able to lay hands on MC. Ok man, whatever you say  We'll find out tomorrow.There are also a bunch of incorrect statements there: asd was never a longtime Code S player, and bitbybit had long fallen off by that time. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:44 Sakray wrote: Yeah, I also remember the NASL S1 final, where Puma won a game that he didn't deserved to, and some other final against MC where it was a 1/1/1 fest. Iirc most of Puma's matches against MC were just 1/1/1, so, I hope this time he's gonna play standard (but I want MC to win) NASL finals were legit. Canceling zealot charge 3 games, great drops. Those were legit macro games. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:53 Zealot Orgy wrote: Yes, but it was still the GOMTvT era, where all you needed to do to get seeded in next season's codeS was to go 1W-2L in the RO32, which lead to tons of crappy players (asd, Virus, Ensare was the trinity of disgrace in particular) to stay in codeS for ages just by cheesing P and Z players, which lead to the developement of various different builds ( (1/1/1, 2port banshee, bitbybit) very hard to stop if you aren't in a mirror. Now that the 1/1/1 era is over he probably won't be able to lay hands on MC. because its not like he has beaten MC in a bo7 without using the 1/1/1... oh wait, he did. | ||
|
gullberg
Sweden1301 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:53 Zealot Orgy wrote: Yes, but it was still the GOMTvT era, where all you needed to do to get seeded in next season's codeS was to go 1W-2L in the RO32, which lead to tons of crappy players (asd, Virus, Ensare was the trinity of disgrace in particular) to stay in codeS for ages just by cheesing P and Z players, which lead to the developement of various different builds ( (1/1/1, 2port banshee, bitbybit) very hard to stop if you aren't in a mirror. Now that the 1/1/1 era is over he probably won't be able to lay hands on MC. Virus/asd have both played damn good games. Virus vs Nestea and asd's first run in code a in particular... | ||
|
Kazang
578 Posts
On March 10 2012 00:51 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Really? MC is much more of a nerdballer than Feast. In the grandfinals, cannon rushing, best control and execution, etc. MC already won Sick Nerd Baller in another tournament. He already has permanent sick nerd baller status. Feast put on a great show and was the only foreigner to really challenge the koreans. He deserves some glory. | ||
|
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
Love it! | ||
| ||
