[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S Ro32 Group E - Page 12
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
phanto
Sweden708 Posts
| ||
vanhio
Niue1017 Posts
| ||
See.Blue
United States2673 Posts
| ||
brachester
Australia1786 Posts
| ||
![]()
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On January 13 2012 20:41 brachester wrote: woah woah chill there seeker, i think you prob need sometimes out in the air to calm down first. I'm pretty sure everyone here (including OP) appreciate what you have done but pls don't take LR threads too seriously, after all they are only forum threads, looking forward to your next one if you decide to make one. He's already calmed down, apologized for being angry and responded properly. They've taken the matter to PMs, and have agreed to collaborate (I think). Please read the whole thread. No need to make a fuss about it anymore. | ||
Ragoo
Germany2773 Posts
| ||
WArped
United Kingdom4845 Posts
| ||
GodOfWar
870 Posts
On January 13 2012 20:59 WArped wrote: I hope Zenio gets through, it's a pretty tough group but I expect his ZvZ to win vs YuGiOh and beating GuMiho in a Bo3. Nobody can deny MMA though, easily top 5 player in the world right now and his ZvT and TvT are just mind-blowing. problem with MMA is, that he usually performs his best against other top players, while messing around against lesser famous ones. and since Bomber already failed yesterday, I wouldnt be too sure anyways, sometimes Code S(kill) turns out to be a bit of Code R(andom) Pinnaclesports punished me too often these days ![]() | ||
brachester
Australia1786 Posts
On January 13 2012 20:47 lichter wrote: He's already calmed down, apologized for being angry and responded properly. They've taken the matter to PMs, and have agreed to collaborate (I think). Please read the whole thread. No need to make a fuss about it anymore. well, sorry for not reading 12 pages of mostly useless posts :/ | ||
WArped
United Kingdom4845 Posts
On January 13 2012 21:20 GodOfWar wrote: problem with MMA is, that he usually performs his best against other top players, while messing around against lesser famous ones. and since Bomber already failed yesterday, I wouldnt be too sure anyways, sometimes Code S(kill) turns out to be a bit of Code R(andom) Pinnaclesports punished me too often these days ![]() I would put MMA on a different level to Bomber, in terms of confidence in Code S and right now in terms of skill. As far as I am aware since he gained his Code S spot he hasn't faltered and dropped to the Up and Downs once and always manages to get out of his groups with ease. That said, I think it's pretty safe to bet on him ![]() | ||
Dew.
Brazil104 Posts
On January 13 2012 09:51 HolyArrow wrote: I honestly think this is pretty silly. Seeker's threads are fine, and I don't see why people are putting up such a fuss about them. The guy works hard to make his threads good (by his own standards; maybe you disagree with those standards, but subjective aesthetics aside, his threads objectively cover everything that a LR thread needs to cover). I realize that perhaps OP didn't mean to offend anyone, but I can't help but feel that it's a bit tactless to just make an entire LR thread as an example of how you think things should be done. Yeah, yeah, thin-skinned, easily offended, etc., but I can see how this is rather embarrassing to Seeker. You guys need to try empathizing a bit: He puts time and effort into LR threads, and, according to him, people seem fine with them (i.e not really many complaints), and then suddenly here's someone posting a LR thread like an indirect, passive-aggressive criticism instead of just PMing Seeker with suggestions. Creating this thread with the intent to criticize has the added consequence of people posting in here and everything becoming a big criticism-fest. Don't get me wrong - there's nothing inherently wrong with collective constructive criticism and I believe we should try to make everyone happy and compromise on how the LR threads look, but it's better that Seeker gets a chance to come forward and ask for suggestions (perhaps being prompted by several PMs) instead of some guy making a thread to just force it down his throat. I second that. | ||
![]()
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
On January 13 2012 19:56 ramon wrote: i almost thought this thread would turn into Milkis part 2 you're still mad at him? | ||
![]()
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On January 13 2012 21:26 brachester wrote: well, sorry for not reading 12 pages of mostly useless posts :/ I don't blame you, there were a lot of garbage posts :D | ||
GodOfWar
870 Posts
On January 13 2012 21:31 WArped wrote: I would put MMA on a different level to Bomber, in terms of confidence in Code S and right now in terms of skill. As far as I am aware since he gained his Code S spot he hasn't faltered and dropped to the Up and Downs once and always manages to get out of his groups with ease. That said, I think it's pretty safe to bet on him ![]() yea I guess so. I might consider to give it a last try, even tho Ive lost 400 Euro this month ![]() Gumihos weakest matchup is TvT, according to the stats. MMA is doing pretty ok in that matchup, and with Boxer and GanZi as practice partners he should be a almost certain bet. Then I would pretty much bet on MMA again, against whoever wins Game 2, because he just crushes through any Zerg that appears in his way. | ||
leo23
United States3075 Posts
Zenio/MMA to come out on top. | ||
Kurr
Canada2338 Posts
Missing caster names (actual caster names, not retarded mixes of them) but that's it. I also greatly dislike the clutter and useless crap in other threads. | ||
secretary bird
447 Posts
MMA > Gumiho Zenio > Yugioh MMA > Zenio Gumiho > Yugioh Gumiho > Zenio | ||
Jacobs Ladder
United States1705 Posts
On January 13 2012 20:18 vanhio wrote: No SlayerS in ro16 plsssss I honestly don't get how people can hate Slayers. Also, Ganzi already advanced. | ||
![]()
fusefuse
Estonia4644 Posts
| ||
dabbeljuh
Germany159 Posts
I also appreciate the OP for putting up a very clean and nice template. i am looking forward to Seekers version of this ![]() peace out w | ||
| ||