EPTI'm quoting on seraphone lol
[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S RO32 D2 - Page 181
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
I'm quoting on seraphone lol | ||
|
Fjodorov
5007 Posts
| ||
|
deadmau
960 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:28 thegreatpiata wrote: Naniwa shouldn't have done what he did but GOM pulling arbitrary rules out of their collective asses just to punish him for not being their puppet is just as stupid and unprofessional as what Naniwa did. I'm also not watching this GSL for that very reason. I may not even watch again until Naniwa returns. It ruins the competitive atmosphere when players have to bend to the business wishes of GOM or face random punishment. I will agree that their punishment may not have been set in stone before it happened, but what he did was VERY childish, and he should have been reprimanded, too far too little can be argued as technicalities, but he did something that a true competitor should never do without punishments, and that is to be a pull a punk-childish-bitch-move. And that's what he did, so he was punished, I'm not going to argue whether or not it was too much or too little. | ||
|
SolidMustard
France1515 Posts
| ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:18 Coal wrote: Good day for oGs :D It's hard to be a bad day in oGs with 3 players in a group of 4 >.> | ||
|
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:30 farnham wrote: I feel bad about fin People have been hyping him up way too much I really don't understand his games either, I was expecting some interesting allins or earlygame timing attacks or multiple-phase harrass timing attacks and such but in every single game he just was really passive and just macroed and it made absolutely no sense to me. | ||
|
TT1
Canada10045 Posts
| ||
|
iiomega
Romania94 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:25 foxmeep wrote: But attacks CAN be held entirely reactively, just not by Zerg  Switch to P for a while and then come back and tell us how that works. | ||
|
AnTiX
France29 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:24 hzflank wrote: Is this satirical? It is almost too ridiculous to believe. The tournament belongs to Gom, not you. They did not revoke Naniwa's GSL spot, because Naniwa never had a GSL spot to begin with. Do you think GSL will still happen if there were no audience ? We bought ticket. They make money out of it and organize a competition with it. If we were all gone, GSL will not be here. And about the gift to Naniwa, of course it's full bullshit. Sorry, I know this discussion do not belong here. This is my last post about it. | ||
|
zul
Germany5427 Posts
 | ||
|
cyclone25
Romania3344 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:30 nomatch353 wrote: I have never seen a zerg having burrow at 8.30 Exactly, people keep saying "get burrow". What if MC had void rays or DT's with that attack? Leenock only saw the zealots. It's impossible to have burrow that fast when going for 3 quick bases anyway. Even if he had burrow, you need at least 15 roaches to make use of it properly. I think Leenock did the correct response, and again, even Artosis agreed with it and was sure that MC's push will fail. | ||
|
FakeDeath
Malaysia6060 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:33 Badfatpanda wrote: It's hard to be a bad day in oGs with 3 players in a group of 4 >.> Agreed. | ||
|
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:30 Asshat wrote: This thread went quickly from "hail the new best zerg/player of all time, ever" to a discussion about how "leenock is overrated"/"zerg is broken". You can tell competitive gaming is getting there when the hyperbole around it perfectly mirrors that of athletic sports. It's totally depressing. I look forward to every player being 'In Crisis' the moment they lose a match. Ugh, I hate modern times. | ||
|
Bashion
Cook Islands2612 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:31 cyclone25 wrote: He didn't even got (or needed) lings, at least not many. How would they help vs mass zealots/sentry? From what you're saying, Leenock should have stopped at 35 drones, get a lot of early roaches to prevent the pylons and also crawlers? All that while not knowing if MC will all in. With speed lings around, it would be super hard to put down any pylons. He still had slow lings at the 9 minute mark, man. | ||
|
aderum
Sweden1459 Posts
| ||
|
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:33 Fjodorov wrote: MC did the right thing, he plays to win. But the strategy mc used might be a bit to powerful considering how easy it is to pull off. He will always destroy the 3rd base at minimun while most pro zergs obviously feel they need 3 base to handle ffe. Dunno, but the match up of PvZ just lacks something. Damn right. I'm proud of any player who uses a lame all in or timing when shit isn't in their favour. MC did what he had to do to win, and he fucking won. That's all i ask for in players i choose as my favourites. And this is coming from a guy whose favourite player, #1, in the whole world, is the Leenocktopus. I love winners. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:35 cyclone25 wrote: Exactly, people keep saying "get burrow". What if MC had void rays or DT's with that attack? Leenock only saw the zealots. It's impossible to have burrow that fast when going for 3 quick bases anyway. Even if he had burrow, you need at least 15 roaches to make use of it properly. I think Leenock did the correct response, and again, even Artosis agreed with it and was sure that MC's push will fail. A pretty decent counterstrategy against this kind of a build is to start burrow and roach speed as soon as the lair is done so you get burrowed roaches, and yes it's going to be in time unless you are way too slow, 8:30 isn't really that fast and you in my opinion should be prepared to defend even by 8:15 unless you scout something that indicates otherwise. | ||
|
FidoDido
United States1292 Posts
On January 10 2012 21:42 Fionn wrote: Looks like ForGG's name fits + Show Spoiler + He had to GG four times tonight. Funniest joke all night, ROFL!!! | ||
|
rushian
United Kingdom568 Posts
On January 10 2012 22:35 cyclone25 wrote: Exactly, people keep saying "get burrow". What if MC had void rays or DT's with that attack? Leenock only saw the zealots. It's impossible to have burrow that fast when going for 3 quick bases anyway. Even if he had burrow, you need at least 15 roaches to make use of it properly. I think Leenock did the correct response, and again, even Artosis agreed with it and was sure that MC's push will fail. I don't understand your artosis reference. With the amount of games artosis watches that suggests the push generally fails, so MC must have executed well, Leenock defended poorly, or most likely a combination of the two | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/7gVpE.png)
