EPT[IPL Team Arena] SlayerS vs. TyLoo - Page 24
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Attilanator
United States154 Posts
| ||
|
danzhang
Canada184 Posts
| ||
|
Olinimm
1471 Posts
| ||
|
SniXSniPe
United States1938 Posts
| ||
|
ItsMeDomLee
Canada2732 Posts
| ||
|
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
On November 30 2011 13:44 1Eris1 wrote: The ignorance in this thread is getting pretty ridiculous. Chinese players have always been ridiculously talented and there are several documented cases of Chinese players competing with highest level of Korean's during BW. When this series turns out to be a lot close than everybody thinks, I'm going to quote this post =). Just for the douches saying stuff like Eve could 5-0 Tyloo. Interesting series though -.-. Slayers man, they suck vs roach rushes | ||
pPingu
Switzerland2892 Posts
 ) | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
| ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
Good job Uhen, you may have done that damned roach-ling build way too much, but you represented China well and put Slayers to the brink. Go Slayers | ||
|
JujuXG
United States373 Posts
On December 02 2011 12:27 bkrow wrote: Lol .. talk about a one trick pony. At least be able to recover and go into a macro game  QFT | ||
|
Brotatolol
United States1742 Posts
| ||
|
Chrian
United States1472 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45437 Posts
Uhen gets away with four five-minute all-ins that only work because the SlayerS players make zero defense... and the last game proves that Uhen has no macro and can't play a long game at all. Uhen didn't outplay the SlayerS team... SlayerS threw away four straight games (and almost a fifth). Maybe SlayerS will realize now that they can't play half-asleep, or they might lose to teams that they should sweep. Should have been 5-1. Hopefully next time, China can bring better matches to the table. | ||
|
tomwizz
524 Posts
On December 02 2011 11:53 tomwizz wrote: tyloo win win you heard it here first. and you will never here it again | ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
| ||
|
Typhon
United States387 Posts
On December 02 2011 12:29 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Thank god SlayerS held on x.x Jesus christ. Uhen gets away with four five-minute all-ins that only work because the SlayerS players make zero defense... and the last game proves that Uhen has no macro and can't play a long game at all. Uhen didn't outplay the SlayerS team... SlayerS threw away four straight games (and almost a fifth). Maybe SlayerS will realize now that they can't play half-asleep, or they might lose to teams that they should sweep. Should have been 5-1. I think the only thing the last game proved that Uhen could have taken down the forge if he'd made one more baneling, and was behind economically after failing his all-in (remember, failing an all-in by definition means you lose. If you can recover from it, it's not "all-in"). Give him crap for using cheesy builds 5 games in a row, but don't take his macro AFTER an all-in as an example of high-level play. Going nydus was the only way he could have put his high-army/low-econ opener to use after he failed the bust. | ||
|
Stanlot
United States5742 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45437 Posts
On December 02 2011 12:32 Typhon wrote: I think the only thing the last game proved that Uhen could have taken down the forge if he'd made one more baneling, and was behind economically after failing his all-in (remember, failing an all-in by definition means you lose. If you can recover from it, it's not "all-in"). Give him crap for using cheesy builds 5 games in a row, but don't take his macro AFTER an all-in as an example of high-level play. Going nydus was the only way he could have put his high-army/low-econ opener to use after he failed the bust. His macro was terrible regardless of his all-in. He was floating plenty of minerals regularly and was repeatedly supply blocked even when phoenixes weren't killing his overlords. I understand that he was behind because his all-in failed, but his macro was sub-par. | ||
|
Tektos
Australia1321 Posts
On December 02 2011 12:23 Olinimm wrote: Nexus first on crevasse isn't really that greedy. I bet he was going to cheese no matter what. Nexus first... not greedy.... wat | ||
| ||
