|
If you don't know how to post in a live report thread by now, be advised: don't whine about game balance and don't bash players/casters/interviewers/staff/other posters. We are monitoring this thread closely.
Stop with the USA USA chant shit. Further offenses beyond page 493 will be met with bans. You've been warned. |
On October 10 2011 06:06 graNite wrote:
LOL @ all the zerg noobs cheering for lucky because he busted greedy play and say "serves the terrans right; dont whine about this all in, you are doing bunker rushes"
yes, we terrans do bunker rushes to bust YOUR greedy expand before building any tech!
how greedy is that?
i hate those opportunists on LR threads...
Those people are idiots, but there's a difference between a roach ling all in and bunker rushing my natural. Roach ling fails you lose. Bunker rush you lose barely anything.
|
On October 10 2011 06:06 Courstice wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2011 06:04 Tewks44 wrote:On October 10 2011 06:03 Pajegetc wrote:
When in Doubt, Cheese the better player out. yeah, I can't believe Lucky recognized MMA's style, made units to counter that style, and then attacked. What a freakin cheeser  You can say the same thing in the IdrA vs Stc series. If you said anything bad about Stc then take it back.
It's the double standard that Zerg Players apply to the game. Makes me hate Zerg players so much.
|
Lucky gaining so much respect for legitimate wins...wait?
Code A must be bronze league in korea nothing but cheese.
|
On October 10 2011 06:06 graNite wrote:
LOL @ all the zerg noobs cheering for lucky because he busted greedy play and say "serves the terrans right; dont whine about this all in, you are doing bunker rushes"
yes, we terrans do bunker rushes to bust YOUR greedy expand before building any tech!
how greedy is that?
i hate those opportunists on LR threads...
Not greedy.
|
On October 10 2011 06:09 cursor wrote:
You have a tech lab on a Rax and you're Terran. If he loses again without making a Marauder, it is 100% his own fault.
He made marauders on the 2nd match...
|
My prediction: Lucky pulling a hat trick on the slayers.
|
I'm a gold scrub and I saw this mistake: you lost to a roach/ling all-in twice in a row... after Ryung and Boxer ALSO lost to it.
|
MMA SUPER GOSU MODE PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEe!
|
mma still getting that factory
|
On October 10 2011 06:08 theMiNUS wrote:no its not! it's like a hail mary in football... high risk/high reward play that sometimes you need to incorporate in there!
Yes... because seeing both teams bomb a 50 yd pass into huge clumps of receivers / defenders *every single play* is fun...
|
On October 10 2011 06:06 Treva wrote:
IdrA gets all in'd twice - STC is all in noob. MMA- gets all in'd twice - Lucky is amazing.
umm most people want MMA to win so its not that lucky is amazing.
and theSTC didn't all in. first is a cheese and had a expo up nerly at no cost. and the 2nd was a push with an expo.
|
On October 10 2011 06:08 theMiNUS wrote:no its not! it's like a hail mary in football... high risk/high reward play that sometimes you need to incorporate in there!
it is still way to powerful in sc2.
|
On October 10 2011 06:09 benthekid wrote:
Lucky gaining so much respect for legitimate wins...wait?
Code A must be bronze league in korea nothing but cheese.
its not cheese... your so dumb
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On October 10 2011 06:05 Assaulter wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2011 06:01 Topdoller wrote:On October 10 2011 06:00 Courstice wrote:
So cheesy damn. its not cheese man, wake up. if MMA keeps going Hellions evey game hes gonna get hard countered pretty funny how everyone cries how cheesy that marauder/hellion push from stc was, but this thing isnt cheesy
Because any Terran unit except Hellion kills roaches dead, MMA has no excuses for losing
|
On October 10 2011 06:06 Alpino wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2011 06:05 kubiks wrote:
To be honnest it's just a terran beeing too cocky, not really the all-in beeing afficient :
on the first game he holds it EZPZ even if he scouts it only 10 sec ahead, and loose because he's too agressive after the all-in
on the second game, well he could have build more bunkers/pull more scv, he knew that was coming Hold EZPZ = lost 15 workers. Game was tough already from that point.
When you scout this kind of all-in 10 sec before and that is a build that counter you, you don't "loose 15 drones", you just die.
Anyway 15 svc dying isn't that much, the zerg was heavyly renforcing with speedlings, the zerg wasn't at 40 drones. The game was even after he hold the all-in, even if the zerg kinda blind countered MMA
|
fast startport this time, seems like banshee
|
Mind games!! It would appear he's not going roaches. But banshee. This is weeiiirrddd.
|
|
|
On October 10 2011 06:08 imareaver3 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2011 06:06 JoeSchmoe wrote:On October 10 2011 06:06 hasuterrans wrote:On October 10 2011 06:05 Assaulter wrote:On October 10 2011 06:01 Topdoller wrote:On October 10 2011 06:00 Courstice wrote:
So cheesy damn. its not cheese man, wake up. if MMA keeps going Hellions evey game hes gonna get hard countered pretty funny how everyone cries how cheesy that marauder/hellion push from stc was, but this thing isnt cheesy I was thinking the same thing. because idra lost to it. Pretty funny how every Terran said that the marauder/hellion push wasn't an all-in. That's why people are complaining. If IdrA had held, the game would have gone on. If MMA held, the game was over.
He would have had no defense against mutas thats a terrible position to be in. And Lucky could have won even it fails as seen in game 1.
|
MMA now starting his 2nd CC
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
