[IeSF] No Korean SC2 player allowed in IeSF 2011 - Page 8
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
bubl100500
Ukraine538 Posts
| ||
KatuStarcraft
Canada161 Posts
| ||
Ryo
8787 Posts
On September 27 2011 05:09 VirgilSC2 wrote: AFAIK They're not required to go to any lengths for FIFA either. Not only are they NOT choosing Korean representatives, they're NOT ALLOWING them. Korean FIFA players are under the jurisdiction of Kespa. Korean SC2 players are not. People over-reacting over a bunch of misinformation. | ||
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On September 27 2011 01:37 parazice wrote: if no Korean then my bet => Happy you bet on happy also in a goody vs happy bo5 final ? | ||
anrimayu
United States875 Posts
| ||
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
On September 27 2011 05:21 KatuStarcraft wrote: This looks to me like Kespa is making a power play to have SC2 teams recognize it as their governing body since the sc2con was disbanded. ...What? Read the thread! Community headlines: "Sc2con disbanded + KeSPA doesn't help SC2 =/= Powerplay" | ||
kiy0
Portugal593 Posts
| ||
infinity2k9
United Kingdom2397 Posts
On September 27 2011 05:21 KatuStarcraft wrote: This looks to me like Kespa is making a power play to have SC2 teams recognize it as their governing body since the sc2con was disbanded. This isn't possible for christs sake. KeSPA cannot be involved with SC2. Can it be said any clearer. Blizzard decided the shots here, unlike the other eSports involved. It doesn't matter if the teams all want it, KeSPA wants it or anyone wants it because they can't. Seriously why people don't point the figure at Blizzard i don't know. KeSPA is just an easy thing for people to hate i guess. Blizz hyped up a game as a new eSports, sequel to the biggest eSport ever, in the biggest eSport nation in the world, and deciding to fucking try and cut out the government-supported governing body of eSports. An organization which has bought nothing but MASSIVE free publicity to Blizzard. It's a mind boggling stupid strategy for the sake of what exactly? More control over Gretech and some puny licensing fee's? Why would partial or full developer control over eSports even be a good thing in the first place. It worked very very well before without them getting involved. | ||
SgtCoDFish
United Kingdom1520 Posts
"Yo, is that the Football Association?" "Yes." "You're in charge of football/soccer in the UK, right?" "That is correct" "Sweet can you pick us a rugby team for this massive tournament that's being held?" It should either be based on GSL points or on fan votes, surely? | ||
Pisko.
United States214 Posts
| ||
CursedFeanor
Canada539 Posts
| ||
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On September 27 2011 05:26 Pisko. wrote: When did TL get so filled with anti-BW/Kespa propaganda? kespa has never been liked on TL, ever. | ||
MayorITC
Korea (South)798 Posts
On September 27 2011 05:25 SgtCoDFish wrote: ... really? They put a BW organisation in charge of SC2? Are they mad? "Yo, is that the Football Association?" "Yes." "You're in charge of football/soccer in the UK, right?" "That is correct" "Sweet can you pick us a rugby team for this massive tournament that's being held?" It should either be based on GSL points or on fan votes, surely? KeSPA isn't BW only. If anything, it was poor decision by IeSF to let KeSPA handle ALL Korean representatives when they have nothing to do with SC2. You can't fault KeSPA for their actions. It's a slap in the face, asking them to choose a representative for a game that competes with one they're in charge of. | ||
sVnteen
Germany2238 Posts
or am i misjusting this? this seems so ridiculously silly to me though | ||
TheButtonmen
Canada1401 Posts
On September 27 2011 04:36 Clbull wrote: It's not their fault. They'd recognise it if Blizzard and GOMTV would actually let them have some control over the scene. If stuff like this is the cost for keeping Kespa out of SC2 then it's a cheap price. On September 27 2011 04:34 Alabasern wrote: Ah I guess this serves Starcraft II it's due justice for being inferior to Brood War in terms I cannot fully express. And yet you complain about SC2 posters mocking in BW threads, class act. | ||
CoB-Vince
143 Posts
I dont know what they were hoping for | ||
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
| ||
Complete
United States1864 Posts
On September 27 2011 03:56 l10f wrote: I don't get what's up with all the kespa hate. I agree kespa makes questionable decisions often, but this time I feel like they made the correct decision. IeSF should not have asked kespa to pick Korean reps because kespa is not the group that manages Korean sc2 progamers. That's like asking a softball organization to pick baseball players. I don't wanna get into talking about whether kespa is necessary in sc2 or not but this is not something to blame kespa for. ....They shouldn't have asked, but KESPA shouldn't have fucking accepted if they're not going to do anything... | ||
Holykitty
Netherlands246 Posts
| ||
CobaltBlu
United States919 Posts
| ||
| ||