EPTIt's so stupid to not allow Korean to play in this.
[IeSF] No Korean SC2 player allowed in IeSF 2011 - Page 3
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
FaCE_1
Canada6172 Posts
It's so stupid to not allow Korean to play in this. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
dignitasNewmaN
Sweden137 Posts
| ||
|
doihy
668 Posts
Why don't you guys blame IesF, they could have just chosen korean players themselves. Ever considered that? | ||
|
redloser
Korea (South)1721 Posts
ONG broadcasts SC2, then KeSPA practically boycotts SC2 lol | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
| ||
|
Shinta)
United States1716 Posts
The 'Global KeSPA' (global esports organization) idea is a cool one, as long as it's nothing like KeSPA. The problem is that it would be way too hard to actually make one. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On September 27 2011 03:39 tree.hugger wrote: KeSPA being KeSPA. This. No surprise here. Well, Grubby to win it all then.  | ||
|
jtbem
Canada1404 Posts
| ||
|
masterbreti
Korea (South)2711 Posts
This is good news. and I fully support this move by KeSPA. Maybe next year IeSF will go back to bw to get the fan support. | ||
Milkis
5003 Posts
yes it's silly but i bet it more has to do with the fact that they have enough trouble covering their bases on the events they officially recognize (esp when one of them needs a lot of attention atm ^^;; to have the resources to pour into sc2the article is pretty sensationalist though since kespa will probably be covering sc2 in the future and they actually had long talks with blizzard about it. but i guess people are so quick to blame shit and sensationalize anything regarding kespa and assume things just because of things they've overheard and gotten sensationalized based on netizen reactions and assume their outdated information still hold Also kind of funny people ask "Why is kespa in charge of iesf"... iesf is something kespa made to begin with | ||
l10f
United States3241 Posts
| ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On September 27 2011 03:54 masterbreti wrote: KeSPA was in charge back when they were still going to do bw. and KeSPA is in charge of choosing all the Korean players for all the games IeSF has. Since KeSPA does not have any interest in sc2. they won't choose a plyer, since nobody plays sc2 in Korea anyways. This is good news. and I fully support this move by KeSPA. Maybe next year IeSF will go back to bw to get the fan support. You're a little bit closed minded there, aren't you... | ||
|
joshboy42
Australia116 Posts
| ||
|
Inside.Out
Canada569 Posts
| ||
Insane
United States4991 Posts
On September 27 2011 03:56 l10f wrote: I don't get what's up with all the kespa hate. I agree kespa makes questionable decisions often, but this time I feel like they made the correct decision. IeSF should not have asked kespa to pick Korean reps because kespa is not the group that manages Korean sc2 progamers. That's like asking a softball organization to pick baseball players. I don't wanna get into talking about whether kespa is necessary in sc2 or not but this is not something to blame kespa for. Kespa had an opportunity to show themselves as being relatively magnanimous and asking GOM to take care of it though. I don't think Kespa should do the picking themselves, but rather should've let GOM take care of it. | ||
|
VirgilSC2
United States6151 Posts
This is completely ridiculous, both on the front that IeSF went to KeSPA regarding SC2, and on the front that KeSPA returned with this statement. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On September 27 2011 03:55 Milkis wrote: it's kind of silly but in the end kespa probably just doesn't have the resources to pour into sc2 and get preliminaries rolling, especially since it's a game they're not in charge of. yes it's silly but i bet it more has to do with the fact that they have enough trouble covering their bases on the events they officially recognize (esp when one of them needs a lot of attention atm ^^;; to have the resources to pour into sc2the article is pretty sensationalist though since kespa will probably be covering sc2 in the future and they actually had long talks with blizzard about it. but i guess people are so quick to blame shit and sensationalize anything regarding kespa and assume things just because of things they've overheard and gotten sensationalized based on netizen reactions and assume their outdated information still hold Also kind of funny people ask "Why is kespa in charge of iesf"... iesf is something kespa made to begin with Couldn't they just outsource that stuff? | ||
|
DarkRise
1644 Posts
On September 27 2011 01:17 amazingxkcd wrote: Well, KeSPA doesn't recognizes SC2 because they do not want to deal with Blizzard on it. It makes sense for their decision. more like trying to block Sc2 so that BW can still hold longer as much as they can. KESPA doesn't have rights in SC2 and won't have any control. | ||
|
lbmaian
United States689 Posts
On September 27 2011 03:55 Milkis wrote: Also kind of funny people ask "Why is kespa in charge of iesf"... iesf is something kespa made to begin with Did not know this. But this makes it even sillier - now it almost sounds like a miscommunication somewhere between KeSPA and IeSF. | ||
| ||
