EPT
[VODS] 4v4 TeamSpeak TL SC2 Open #23 - Page 5
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
JimmyHollow
United Kingdom249 Posts
| ||
|
moltenlead
Canada866 Posts
| ||
|
buscettn
Austria129 Posts
will be fun though. looking forward to it. | ||
|
FILM
United States663 Posts
| ||
|
justiceknight
Singapore5741 Posts
if any1 wanna hook me up on a team,let me know.Prefer 4 Masters heres my profile,i can access to NA/SEA.I can play zerg/toss http://sea.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/55665/1/DarkRocket/ | ||
|
Athox
Norway64 Posts
imagine 3 zergs all 6-pooling... with all the extra minerals, they'll be unbeatable | ||
|
DyEnasTy
United States3714 Posts
| ||
|
DyEnasTy
United States3714 Posts
On September 06 2011 22:13 Athox wrote: 3v4 is a bad idea... the team with 3 players has an early game advantage imagine 3 zergs all 6-pooling... with all the extra minerals, they'll be unbeatable Isnt there something that prevents mineral transfers for the first few minutes of the game? | ||
|
DexVitality
Hong Kong234 Posts
| ||
|
NemesysTV
United States1088 Posts
| ||
|
jimchoi11
United States65 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25990 Posts
| ||
|
Too_MuchZerg
Finland2818 Posts
Player A (captain) Player B Player C Player D Player E Player F Player G While Players C and D might not have enough time (or team captain Player A decides to get "better" players for finale) and Players E, F or G steps up. Who will get prize money then? Who ever participates final only? Or is it given to team captain who then gives out to other players? | ||
|
fortheGG
United Kingdom1002 Posts
On September 06 2011 23:05 Chill wrote: I'm so fucking excited for this. Nothing more to say. Hope we get to see an epic TL team get far | ||
|
Magicpop
Canada71 Posts
On September 06 2011 22:13 Athox wrote: 3v4 is a bad idea... the team with 3 players has an early game advantage imagine 3 zergs all 6-pooling... with all the extra minerals, they'll be unbeatable there is no extra mineral.. It's 3v4 .. Its not 4v4 with someone leaving at the begining. Edit: i misread, it is indeed 4v4 with someone leaving in the begining. Dont think its a good idea either! | ||
|
Saishuuheiki
United States188 Posts
On September 06 2011 23:40 Magicpop wrote: there is no extra mineral.. It's 3v4 .. Its not 4v4 with someone leaving at the begining. What he's referring to is that if a player leaves, any income mined by his workers is divided amongst the remaining players. Thus, at the start the 3 players will recieve 1.3x their normal income, making for a 8pool economy with a 6pool timing. Basically it can be a brutal rush. If the rush fails to kill 2 players however, it's probably game over. | ||
|
Pyrthas
United States3196 Posts
On September 06 2011 14:36 CoR wrote: am i blind ? what server is it ? i hope so much its eu server On September 06 2011 13:06 devilcry wrote: its great to have nice tournaments every week but i dont understand why are you ignoring europe for more than a month now...I thought it would be something like eu-us-eu-us but now its us-us-us-us-us...Can we europeans please have a TL open anytime soon ?  On June 29 2011 15:41 Hot_Bid wrote: TeamSpeak TL SC2 #18 Tournament Details From now on, all TL SC2 Opens will take place on the NA server. We previous stated that we'd alternate servers, but we feel that several factors favor holding it on NA. First, we like consistency, and players wondering each week whether the server is NA or EU (and wondering what time the tournament starts) is not good for the tournament. Second, with the added interest from the Korean server, we want to allow all players an opportunity to play (EU-KR is impossible due to lag). Lastly, and probably most importantly, we receive a lot more signups when we hold the tournament on NA, possibly due to the already large number of weekly tournaments held on EU. In addition, it seems that when we hold it on EU there are a large number of players playing two tournaments or having conflicting commitments. We apologize to our EU members who want to play in a TL Open, but we hope you guys understand our decision. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=238478 | ||
|
QuixoticO
Netherlands810 Posts
Can't wait to follow this should be mad entertaining :3 | ||
iHirO
United Kingdom1381 Posts
On September 06 2011 22:13 Athox wrote: 3v4 is a bad idea... the team with 3 players has an early game advantage imagine 3 zergs all 6-pooling... with all the extra minerals, they'll be unbeatable Theres an even nastier variant, where you can queue up workers for the player who has left and let a zerg player unqueue them to get the refund. Basically this means the zerg can get a super fast 6 pool with two hatches and speed while his allies continue with normal builds. Its extremely hard to defend against and puts you at a massive tech disadvantage. Maybe they should replace the missing player with a medium AI  | ||
|
beridoxy
France54 Posts
| ||
| ||
