EPTwell at least it would be kinda obvious for the casual person to get an idea of what's happening, CTF and conquest are pretty simple formats to understand
and tbh for me personally wow vanilla pvp was much more fun than arena ever was
Blizz EU Invite - Day 1 - Page 384
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Try to keep it positive in the thread please. And stop hating on other games! Respect and show everyone how awesome TL is :D | ||
|
FliedLice
Germany7494 Posts
well at least it would be kinda obvious for the casual person to get an idea of what's happening, CTF and conquest are pretty simple formats to understand and tbh for me personally wow vanilla pvp was much more fun than arena ever was | ||
|
vollpfosten
Germany11 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:18 Fyzar wrote: Not that true, from what I see, the player pool is back from the old days mostly. Anotherx has played since vanilla afaik. so, since i quit the game like 4 years ago iam expecting him to do "best" (whatever it will be today) 8) | ||
|
Scrandom
Canada2819 Posts
oh sweet thank you thesidu and fyzar | ||
|
Spitmode
Germany1510 Posts
it indeed was | ||
|
poundcakes
Norway239 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:20 Jibba wrote: I'll be watching this, but it still boggles my mind that Blizzard doesn't promote RBG as their WoW ESPORT at all. It would be so much better from a spectator perspective. Rated Battlegrounds aren't anywhere near competetive on the same level as arena, even with the faults arena has and Blizzard's problems with balancing the game (it's mainly played/balanced for its PvE). Rated Battlegrounds are also very boring in the sense that there's only fightning near the nodes and as such there's less action and when there is action it's even harder to follow/make sense of since there are more far more people that the six in a 3v3. | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:22 resilve wrote: How does RBG work exactly? 10 people enter WSG in a premade and play a normal game? I haven't played WoW since Algalon. I think that would have a far far higher cap for communication, skill and teamwork than 3 people in a smaller box, although I can see the difference in gametimes ranging from 10 minutes to 2-3 hours or something silly. Yeah, you play only against other rated premade teams. You could switch into the team's voice chat during big battles and fly around the map focusing on small engagements. It would basically be the equivalent of playing CS on a normal map, vs playing on aim_map (arena.) On August 07 2011 06:24 poundcakes wrote: I've played in them and while that's true (although they're less competitive because Blizzard has handicapped them and everyone stopped caring), less direct fighting actually leads to more tension.Rated Battlegrounds aren't anywhere near competetive on the same level as arena, even with the faults arena has and Blizzard's problems with balancing the game (it's mainly played/balanced for its PvE). Rated Battlegrounds are also very boring in the sense that there's only fightning near the nodes and as such there's less action and when there is action it's even harder to follow/make sense of since there are more far more people that the six in a 3v3. You don't need to focus on what each ability did, you just need to cast the general idea of what each team was trying to do, such as training a healer. Again, it's like playing a normal CS map vs. aim_map. There's far more action on aim_map, but there's much less depth to it. | ||
|
bo0
Belgium550 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:23 FliedLice wrote: well at least it would be kinda obvious for the casual person to get an idea of what's happening, CTF and conquest are pretty simple formats to understand the thing is, everyone with a mild understanding of pvp hates battlegrounds as a measurement of skill it's like saying "in SC2 we should have 4v4 in tournaments" WoW isn't even balanced for 3v3, let alone 10v10 or 15v15, and personal skill is far less important in battlegrounds | ||
|
Isaac
United States810 Posts
| ||
|
NexUmbra
Scotland3776 Posts
| ||
|
DreamOen
Spain1400 Posts
| ||
|
Denzil
United Kingdom4193 Posts
Vhell was pretty cool but the Streamwatchers and Arenajunkie people bashed the hell out of him constantly it was actually kind of sad. | ||
|
KiWiKaKi
Canada691 Posts
| ||
|
Benjef
United Kingdom6921 Posts
| ||
|
Gamgee
United States135 Posts
 | ||
|
Fyzar
Netherlands8010 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:26 Denzil wrote: Vhell was pretty cool but the Streamwatchers and Arenajunkie people bashed the hell out of him constantly it was actually kind of sad. Do you remember Vhell coming up in that full wizard outfit? He was brilliant tbh  .Also, this thread has thinned down to ten people bringing back old WoW memories, and 10 people who are interested to see what WoW arena looks like ;p. | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38205 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:21 Denzil wrote: No idea how to embed but this is the one I'm talking about Last 2 minutes are the best. I was going to post this as well, game 2 from 2:07 onwards is quality. "Don't open, don't open" "...I've opened!" "You're joking!" "MOTHERFUCKERS" "Don't be rude!" heh | ||
|
Denzil
United Kingdom4193 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:26 KiWiKaKi wrote: naniwa gonna own tarson , its gonna be the warsaw chainsaw massacre how long did it take you to think of that one?  Kali constantly shouting to not break his gouge always makes me smile. | ||
|
NexUmbra
Scotland3776 Posts
Imba song :p that they were playing | ||
|
Broodwurst
Germany1586 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:23 Jibba wrote: It would work the exact same as CS casts. Switch between players, and then use an overhead camera over flags. It probably wouldn't work for WSG, but you could use it for Gilneas and AB. I think most of the game would be lost due to scale, might be me tho. | ||
|
StyLeD
United States2965 Posts
| ||
| ||
