EPTOn July 22 2011 18:46 FXOpen wrote:
Horror isn't a b teamer.......
Horror isn't a b teamer.......
He played bad tho, not saying qxc dint play good. But that was just terrible play
[GSTL] Venus Group Week 5 - Page 23
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
ragnorr
Denmark6097 Posts
He played bad tho, not saying qxc dint play good. But that was just terrible play | ||
|
hawthwang
United States107 Posts
| ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
On July 22 2011 18:46 Wargizmo wrote: Not really, I think Nestea/MvP know they could all kill this line up pretty easily, can't blame them for giving the newer guys some experience. Beating FXO 4-3 is substantially worse than beating them 4-0, because points count. IM is in second at the halfway point of the season. Throwing away points against FXO could end up biting them in the ass down the line if "fOu" (FXO) gets an all-kill or something. | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
On July 22 2011 18:48 Cokefreak wrote: Gogo Qcx all-kill! yes please! but i highly doubt that | ||
Poopi
France12992 Posts
Horror lost to KawaiiRice in some iccup korean weekly lol | ||
|
Ansalem
564 Posts
| ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
 qxc starting at the bottom BBi starting at the top3:00 1 rax gasless FE for qxc, Gateway cybernetics core and both gasses for BBi 4:20 Nexus for BBi | ||
|
Suc
Australia1569 Posts
| ||
|
Bobble
Australia1493 Posts
If he's D, are we all Z team? Actually, that sounds cool. Go Z team Go! | ||
|
Haydin
United States1481 Posts
On July 22 2011 18:47 L3g3nd_ wrote: is this going to be game 1? or game 2? if so what happened game 1 Game 2. Game 1 qxc beat horror with a really cool style of marines/tanks/hellions/ravens with sensor towers and a million rax. | ||
|
Lorizean
Germany1330 Posts
On July 22 2011 18:47 Daralii wrote: Out of curiosity, would researching HSM be at all viable against big flocks of mutas? I know it's slow and doesn't do much damage, but could it at least make them run away so that you can deal with the lings/blings? I'd think you could get a hit off too, since like nobody would ever expect it. Other than that, I thought that "defensive" HSMs could be good, like when the Zerg follows medivacs etc., a HSM could save a lot of them. I don't play Terran though, so I'm not too sure. Also, it might be too much of an investment for so few uses. | ||
|
RaiKageRyu
Canada4773 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On July 22 2011 18:47 Daralii wrote: Out of curiosity, would researching HSM be at all viable against big flocks of mutas? I know it's slow and doesn't do much damage, but could it at least make them run away so that you can deal with the lings/blings? Mutas can actually outmicro them, but it's more the large investment of res that's not really needed. Someone finally *will* do that, but not yet, hehe. | ||
|
Theoren
Canada810 Posts
| ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
Shewklad
Sweden482 Posts
On July 22 2011 18:48 hawthwang wrote: They're underestimating QXC too much -.- Don't think they are. I just think they don't give a damn if they lose their first games, they'll just bring out a giant later on. It's good for QXC tho, sure is a confident booster to win some games in GSTL no matter who it's against! | ||
|
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On July 22 2011 18:48 FXOpen wrote: The current player in the booth, would be considered a B teamer... But not horror. He is just less experienced. Although I am not trying to talk my team up (pipi is a B teamer) Horror is a decent player in their development side of their A team. I wouldn't be surprised if he qualifies for Code A with a good bracket. Hmm... Maybe... But the gap between someone like Horror and someone like Yoda, Happy, and Yongwha who I'd consider A team is pretty god damn huge whether horror plays his best or not. | ||
|
denad
Sweden67 Posts
| ||
|
DisaFear
Australia4074 Posts
 | ||
|
Jono7272
United Kingdom6330 Posts
| ||
| ||
