EPTMLG Columbus Day 3 - Page 37
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
We will be moderating harshly in this thread. Think twice before you post. Things we are watching for: image macros, balance whining, "eagles", player bashing etc. We encourage civil and reasoned critique of our moderation - please post it in the website feedback forum. Please don't complain about MLG stream quality or MLG itself. They work very hard to provide you with an enjoyable service. Enough with the racism discussions, this is a LR Thread. Cut it out. -- updated 7:55 KST | ||
|
CrumpetGuvnor
Australia302 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 05 2011 23:30 Drazerk wrote: 1:30 Gate way on the way for Cruncehr Kiwi gets his a bit later 2:40 Gas finishing for both players | ||
Mouzone
3937 Posts
| ||
|
last.resistance
Canada543 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
Crashburn
United States476 Posts
| ||
|
dartoo
India2889 Posts
| ||
|
catabowl
United States815 Posts
| ||
|
thopol
Japan4560 Posts
| ||
|
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
On June 05 2011 23:25 Asha` wrote: He's not top 16 unless he wins this match I believe? He did beat QXC last night too. I'd have more issues with SeleCT going 0-5 and retaining his place if he hadn't been in a group where every single player would have been a contender for first or second in any other group. The format is definitely too protective of the top players given the fluctuation in the upper echelons (particularly since last years MLG circuit), but this is one time I won't complain about it xD You can't have your cake and eat it too. So if it was Tyler/InControl/Ret/Gretorp and Select went 0-5 you would have a problem? I see your point, and logically it makes sense. The tournament cannot adjust for "difficulty of opponents" (since that's the point of seeding in the first place). I agree - I think the bottom individual in pool play (so 6th place in each pool) is eliminated, start with the 5th place individual. Alternatively, have 12 seeds, 4 Korean invites, 8 Open Bracket individuals. It might make logistics difficult though. | ||
|
Huggerz
Great Britain919 Posts
On June 05 2011 23:29 Zarahtra wrote: I just dont understand how he can be 0-5... he's sooooooooooo good :/ Group C... | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
3:00 Core and second gas on the way for Kiwi No second gas for cruncher yet | ||
|
Yaotzin
South Africa4280 Posts
On June 05 2011 23:30 Eternalmisfit wrote: Select's showing in that game shows just hard that group of death was that a player of this caliber went 0-5 in that group. Or it shows how poor Incontrol is at dealing with drop play? | ||
|
barth
Ireland1272 Posts
| ||
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
On June 05 2011 23:30 youngminii wrote: Hard to think that this guy who just completely rolled Inc went 0-5 Well, Select had an infinitely more hard group than inc. Select is a lot better  | ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
On June 05 2011 23:30 Beyonder wrote: Select just a much better player imo Such an awesome multitaskerYeah, Incontrol just can't handle the multitasking of Select's drops. He's playing like MMA did yesterday. Select/Thorzain will be a great series. | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On June 05 2011 23:30 youngminii wrote: And then I'll kill your medivac with my 5 phoenixes and run away. Point is, drop diverted. If my army's there to kill your units then even better for me. 5 Phoenix to shut down drops is 750/500 investment and it doesnt plug in very well to the rest of the PvT matchup. | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 05 2011 23:31 Drazerk wrote: 3:00 Core and second gas on the way for Kiwi No second gas for cruncher yet 3:30 Cruncher now getting his second gas | ||
| ||
Kiwikaki 
