|
On May 03 2011 20:35 dtz wrote: people forget /doesn't realise that sc is extremely young though. He is like 15? Everytime i see him, he seemed to have leveled up.
He's the same age as Leenock
|
|
Losira got owned. GTFO of GSL Zergs >:D
|
On May 03 2011 20:36 theMarkovian wrote: Why is everyone going all "Nada vs. sC"? According to liquipedia, Nada is in the upper bracket (vs. the winner of Inca/Killer) and sC in the lower (vs the winner of Nestea/Anypro). Is everyone wrong, or is liquipedia wrong? everyone is wrong.
|
Good learning experience for Losira. Gotta learn to deal with the cheese. FD got knocked out by it, as did Nestea, no reason it should be different for Losira.
|
|
Why is it that I sense 99% of QQ'ers in this thread play zerg?
If it's not cheese that you're crying about, it's something about your race. When a zerg wins, it's "perfect play" that outplays his opponent.
|
Sc is good, but he has shown nothing special about his TvZ, just abusive play and Losira did many mistakes. He was the better player today, no doubt. But when you compare his TvZ with MVP for example, it's night and day, it's not even funny. MVP is the best TvZer in Korea and everything he does is just beautifull, nothing abusive. When he smash a zerg, he outplays him in every ways.
|
On May 03 2011 20:36 Tachion wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2011 20:34 Blasterion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:32 Tachion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:32 Blasterion wrote: SC just totally out classed Losira in A. Multi Aggression -Game 1 B. Early Aggression-Game 2 C. Standard Macro-Game 3
One more Terran Hero has been added to BlasterIon's Terran Hero list game 3 was not a standard macro game. I dunno why you think it was. I don't see why it isn't can you please explain to me why that isn't a macro game? Because Losira basically went all-in speedling with a hidden expansion. That is not standard. And that's SC's fault how?
|
On May 03 2011 20:36 theMarkovian wrote: Why is everyone going all "Nada vs. sC"? According to liquipedia, Nada is in the upper bracket (vs. the winner of Inca/Killer) and sC in the lower (vs the winner of Nestea/Anypro). Is everyone wrong, or is liquipedia wrong? They're just comparing the two players. If they meet in the final SC will get owned based on what he showed us today.
Pretty sure the bracket is correct otherwise >_>
|
On May 03 2011 20:35 ItsMeDomLee wrote: I see a Nada Sangho finals. SangHo is neeever going to get past InCa in a PvP.
|
On May 03 2011 20:36 densha wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2011 20:33 zocktol wrote:On May 03 2011 20:32 ChickenLips wrote: 'One of the best Terrans in Korea'
'Amazing TvZ player'
wow, I don't think Tasteless has ever said something more wrong, and everything he does is plugging sponsor / parrotting Artosis / saying wrong things about SC2 24/7. Explain, why he is wrong please. He won the first game with an all-in, the second with another all-in, and the third he predictably went marine/tank on a very marine/tank friendly map. Nothing "amazing", nothing there that makes him one of the best Terrans, etc. I honestly don't know what Tasteless was thinking saying that so many times. Er, yet Losira lost all 3? & isn't that how MKP made his name in the first place? High-tempo styled aggression? Listen, Losira lost in almost all faculties of the game. Stop whining & give Sc some credit.
|
On May 03 2011 20:37 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2011 20:36 Tachion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:34 Blasterion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:32 Tachion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:32 Blasterion wrote: SC just totally out classed Losira in A. Multi Aggression -Game 1 B. Early Aggression-Game 2 C. Standard Macro-Game 3
One more Terran Hero has been added to BlasterIon's Terran Hero list game 3 was not a standard macro game. I dunno why you think it was. I don't see why it isn't can you please explain to me why that isn't a macro game? Because Losira basically went all-in speedling with a hidden expansion. That is not standard. And that's SC's fault how? ...Did I say it was sC's fault? All I said was that it was not a standard macro game, jeeze.
|
aaaaaaaarg just streaming in marines that cost no gas and hardcounter superexpensive high tech speedbanelings off creep... the best zerg in the world getting demolished by some random Terran guy just makes me sad Losira just kept on making the wrong decisions, and that is gg for any zerg, while any T/P player would still do at least some damage, but 100zerglings in a terran base seem to be not enough to get an advantage...
|
On May 03 2011 20:35 JKira wrote: Some questionable unit control by Losira in all 3 games. Very well played by sC. A lot of people complaining don't realize that it actually does take skill to split marines against speed banelings constantly. (sC can vouch for that from game 3 :p)
With that said I hope Nada has what it takes to edge out sC in his best matchup! Nada and sC are on opposite sides of the bracket
|
On May 03 2011 20:36 theMarkovian wrote: Why is everyone going all "Nada vs. sC"? According to liquipedia, Nada is in the upper bracket (vs. the winner of Inca/Killer) and sC in the lower (vs the winner of Nestea/Anypro). Is everyone wrong, or is liquipedia wrong? The liquidpedia brackets seem to change every 2nd day... but since Nada and SC both played on the same day, my money is on them meeting in the semis. Also, I seem to recall after the match recap, the bracket was put up and Nada is due to meet sC.
|
On May 03 2011 20:37 Orpheusz wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2011 20:35 dtz wrote: people forget /doesn't realise that sc is extremely young though. He is like 15? Everytime i see him, he seemed to have leveled up. He's the same age as Leenock OMG didn't know that he's only 16y old. Looks older to me.
|
On May 03 2011 20:37 HyunA1 wrote: Why is it that I sense 99% of QQ'ers in this thread play zerg?
If it's not cheese that you're crying about, it's something about your race. When a zerg wins, it's "perfect play" that outplays his opponent.
Because it requires perfect play to win as zerg lol. Make a mistake, you lose. Play at the same level of your opponent? You lose.
|
On May 03 2011 20:38 Tachion wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2011 20:37 Blasterion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:36 Tachion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:34 Blasterion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:32 Tachion wrote:On May 03 2011 20:32 Blasterion wrote: SC just totally out classed Losira in A. Multi Aggression -Game 1 B. Early Aggression-Game 2 C. Standard Macro-Game 3
One more Terran Hero has been added to BlasterIon's Terran Hero list game 3 was not a standard macro game. I dunno why you think it was. I don't see why it isn't can you please explain to me why that isn't a macro game? Because Losira basically went all-in speedling with a hidden expansion. That is not standard. And that's SC's fault how? ...Did I say it was sC's fault? All I said was that it was not a standard macro game, jeeze. STANDARD? This is GSL bro, not ladder
|
On May 03 2011 20:33 HolyArrow wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2011 20:32 isM wrote:On May 03 2011 20:31 Mercury- wrote: Yeah, sC can't win any standard games, right? Frankly with how poor his engagements were in that game he shouldn't have won, but Losira didn't play very well either. How about outplaying Losira so badly in the early game that he could afford to lose that much stuff, and macro so well that even after the 3rd time it happened, he was still way ahead in supply? Oh please. Any bronze can use fake 2 rax pressure into FE build. It wasnt sc outplaying, it was Losira overreacting. But after seeing how 2 rax pressure went really well in game 2 I cant really blame him.
|
|
|
|