|
On February 25 2011 20:51 gnutz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2011 20:48 Taf the Ghost wrote:Poll: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1?Yes (72) 84% No (10) 12% If you have time (4) 5% 86 total votes Your vote: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
WTF? This game was so bad and boring, why do you recommend it? Protoss built Phoenixes and Colossus' from the beginning till the end, Terran built only Vikings. They camped like 20 Minutes and then Squirtle lost. What was good about that?
It was unorthodox.
|
On February 25 2011 20:51 fighter2_40 wrote:
Kelly saying "unit that is faster and stronger" stalkers? .... No wrong wrong wrong. stalkers are slower, weaker. ZZZ but yeah squirtle did overmake phoenixes tough, after the first main engagement he stopped producing gateway units. should have just given up the air battle and made stalkers at that point while supernova produces more vikings.
but the thing is terran went mass marauder, stalker+colo would've died even faster to that
|
On February 25 2011 20:51 gnutz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2011 20:48 Taf the Ghost wrote:Poll: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1?Yes (72) 84% No (10) 12% If you have time (4) 5% 86 total votes Your vote: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
WTF? This game was so bad and boring, why do you recommend it? Protoss built Phoenixes and Colossus' from the beginning till the end, Terran built only Vikings. They camped like 20 Minutes and then Squirtle lost. What was good about that?
Did you see the other 3 games? I think that is why.
|
On February 25 2011 20:48 Asha` wrote:
Squirtle stayed on Colossus too long, Viking ball got out of control to the extent that he could snipe them super fast
Squirtle stay with the Collossus cose he had his Phoenix ball. Still, phoenixes MUST be used for harass along with support, to fund their higher cost. Analizing both armies, was kinda obvious that T was ahead. Marauder rape gate units with no colosus support, and collosi takes much more time to replenish compared to MM-viking ball, so trade with collosi is a go for T.
|
On February 25 2011 20:50 Jetaap wrote:
We need artosis so badly :'( . The turret push was brilliant by the terran
i tottaly agree, kelly make us realise that we love artosis so much
|
Im so happy Kelly wasn't casting BW, the amount of magikarp jokes when  HiyA is playing would make me close the stream 
|
Cross positions on Tal'Darim, Supernova going for a reaper expand. Squirtle going for a 3 gate expand.
|
Two gas = expansion. She needs to stop giving analysis
|
"Expanding, outside his base"
T.T
|
On February 25 2011 20:52 VorcePA wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2011 20:51 gnutz wrote:On February 25 2011 20:48 Taf the Ghost wrote:Poll: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1?Yes (72) 84% No (10) 12% If you have time (4) 5% 86 total votes Your vote: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
WTF? This game was so bad and boring, why do you recommend it? Protoss built Phoenixes and Colossus' from the beginning till the end, Terran built only Vikings. They camped like 20 Minutes and then Squirtle lost. What was good about that? It was unorthodox.
It wasn't even unorthodox. The strategy is really old.
Hmm, i don't think Moonglades Games were worse than this.
|
On February 25 2011 20:50 red4ce wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2011 20:33 red4ce wrote:
Why do people think Squirtle vs supernova will be any good? Squirtle's gonna roll this guy hard. Looks like I spoke too soon. *Puts foot in mouth*
Supernova was a pro in BW in KT the same team that God is in .
|
Tasteless: Masters on NA is pretty easy hmm comming SotG discussion.
|
Blue flame drop for Supernova, Early Robo bay for Squirtle.
|
On February 25 2011 20:55 LoCaD wrote:
Tasteless: Masters on NA is pretty easy hmm comming SotG discussion.
Why? It's a fact when you compare with Korean ladder.
|
I usually laugh all the time while watching Tastosis but today's joke are really poor.
|
I think everyone agrees NA is the worst of the 3 ladders. I haven't seen any pros vehemently disagree.
|
On February 25 2011 20:54 gnutz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2011 20:52 VorcePA wrote:On February 25 2011 20:51 gnutz wrote:On February 25 2011 20:48 Taf the Ghost wrote:Poll: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1?Yes (72) 84% No (10) 12% If you have time (4) 5% 86 total votes Your vote: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
WTF? This game was so bad and boring, why do you recommend it? Protoss built Phoenixes and Colossus' from the beginning till the end, Terran built only Vikings. They camped like 20 Minutes and then Squirtle lost. What was good about that? It was unorthodox. It wasn't even unorthodox. The strategy is really old. Hmm, i don't think Moonglades Games were worse than this.
Old strategies are unorthodox. I don't see mass phoenix in TvP. Also, how often do you see the deep six in brood war anymore?
|
|
|
On February 25 2011 20:56 phisku wrote:
I usually laugh all the time while watching Tastosis but today's joke are really poor.
Tasteosis is actually not casting
|
On February 25 2011 20:51 gnutz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2011 20:48 Taf the Ghost wrote:Poll: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1?Yes (72) 84% No (10) 12% If you have time (4) 5% 86 total votes Your vote: Recommend SuperNova vs Squirtle Game 1? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
WTF? This game was so bad and boring, why do you recommend it? Protoss built Phoenixes and Colossus' from the beginning till the end, Terran built only Vikings. They camped like 20 Minutes and then Squirtle lost. What was good about that?
ALL of the games today should be recommended to be watched because everyone is a lesson to people how NOT to react. This game was no exception.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
