|
On January 18 2011 18:32 Holgerius wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2011 18:31 Phenny wrote:On January 18 2011 18:29 Meteora.GB wrote:
Geez, BanBans has around 80 APM compare to 200 from Top. Not that it really matters, but I'm surprised to see low APM in the GSL. Well the 200 is just spam anyway, when it gets going BanBans will prolly have higher. He really could've used some additional APM when he didn't send units back to defend against the drop...
He had like a full minute to do that...it wasn't his APM that held him back, he just decided not to (whether it was like Artosis said, scared that his army would get caught out of position, or something else), but that's a decision making thing, not his APM.
|
|
|
Protoss still hasnt gotten thermal lance!
|
On January 18 2011 18:34 Holgerius wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2011 18:33 Greentellon wrote:On January 18 2011 18:29 Meteora.GB wrote:
Geez, BanBans has around 80 APM compare to 200 from Top. Not that it really matters, but I'm surprised to see low APM in the GSL. My default APM is around 60, and I have won players who had triple of that. I can do 400APM with spam but that doesn't make any of it useful. Do you play on professional level?
No, just trying to point out the uselessness of looking at APM meter.
|
|
|
Top with several effective drops, very good job.
|
Completely terrible desperation attack, despite no reason to be that desperate.
|
Snarf'd right into that terran deathball.
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
This guy is the true suicide toss.
|
United Kingdom38201 Posts
Top's drop doing that much damage at Banbans third really messed with his head, what a bizarre engagement choice.
Well, pretty impressive from TOP.
|
Another day I wish artosis was solo commentating 
|
Lol Banbans streamlines all his army against a perfect arch, no force-fields, no nothing...and everything just dies.
|
|
|
again ... nice emp by top got all the sentries !
On January 18 2011 18:38 sleepingdog wrote:
Lol Banbans streamlines all his army against a perfect arch, no force-fields, no nothing...and everything just dies.
He emped them
|
Poll: Recommend Banbans vs TOP game 2 ?No (31) 57% If you have time (21) 39% Yes (2) 4% 54 total votes Your vote: Recommend Banbans vs TOP game 2 ? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
|
wow wtf with these Code A players -.-
|
Amazing how Tastosis are consistently snearing "A players", someone should explain them that they're degrading the whole significance of the tournament.
|
BanBans displaying horrible decision making in both games
Top looks like he deserves Code S though
|
On January 18 2011 18:36 Greentellon wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2011 18:34 Holgerius wrote:On January 18 2011 18:33 Greentellon wrote:On January 18 2011 18:29 Meteora.GB wrote:
Geez, BanBans has around 80 APM compare to 200 from Top. Not that it really matters, but I'm surprised to see low APM in the GSL. My default APM is around 60, and I have won players who had triple of that. I can do 400APM with spam but that doesn't make any of it useful. Do you play on professional level? No, just trying to point out the uselessness of looking at APM meter.
If you want to compete on this level, you won't get away with having 60 APM.
|
Well played by oGsTOP. I'm pretty sure I saw a nuke production and it would have been interesting to see how TOP wanted to utilize it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
