EPTOn January 18 2011 18:23 Phenny wrote:
Now that you mention it, yes lol.
Can't believe I didn't notice >.<
Yeah looks like I'm watching it through a screen door. Now that you mention it, yes lol.
Can't believe I didn't notice >.<
[GSL] : Jan Code A ro8 - Page 6
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
greycubed
United States615 Posts
| ||
|
DarkRise
1644 Posts
at least there is no TvT my prediction would be top, sc, july, moon | ||
|
Eurekastreet
1308 Posts
| ||
|
Jaw
United States274 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:25 greycubed wrote: Yeah looks like I'm watching it through a screen door. HQ resteam next to the calender | ||
|
Kamais_Ookin
Canada4218 Posts
| ||
|
zyzski
United States698 Posts
| ||
|
Tyree
1508 Posts
| ||
|
rbx270j
Canada540 Posts
| ||
|
Robje
Netherlands1044 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:27 rbx270j wrote: obs is on ENG version again. :D Indeed, guess they noticed it too  | ||
|
Meteora.GB
Canada2479 Posts
| ||
|
raidmaster
474 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:29 Meteora.GB wrote: Geez, BanBans has around 80 APM compare to 200 from Top. Not that it really matters, but I'm surprised to see low APM in the GSL. Protoss doesn't actually require more apm. At least at BanBans level. | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:25 Tosho wrote: Nice game, phoenix do seem to have more potential to discover. Colossi/phoenixes were pretty common before the patch already, I've seen both Genius and Tester use them to soak up damage from the vikings. I never really liked it, since it's extremely gas heavy. Spamming zealots as meatshield against marauders is fine, only 100 minerals down the drain. But 100 gas for each phoenix is a whole different story. Imo the korean PvT is currently behind the "western" PvT on metagame. Even if they execute their builds perfectly, they stay with colossi way too long. MC is the only one who has figured out the pro-terran-timings, once his terran opponents have sufficient vikings he has chargelots/blink and HTs - as seen in his game vs Nada. | ||
|
Phenny
Australia1435 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:29 Meteora.GB wrote: Geez, BanBans has around 80 APM compare to 200 from Top. Not that it really matters, but I'm surprised to see low APM in the GSL. Well the 200 is just spam anyway, when it gets going BanBans will prolly have higher. | ||
|
Shalaiyn
Netherlands2735 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:31 Phenny wrote: Well the 200 is just spam anyway, when it gets going BanBans will prolly have higher. He really could've used some additional APM when he didn't send units back to defend against the drop... | ||
|
Deleted User 124618
1142 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:29 Meteora.GB wrote: Geez, BanBans has around 80 APM compare to 200 from Top. Not that it really matters, but I'm surprised to see low APM in the GSL. My default APM is around 60, and I have won players who had triple of that. I can do 400APM with spam but that doesn't make any of it useful. | ||
|
Tyree
1508 Posts
Looks like another more macroish game, nice to see | ||
|
KingRajesh
United States927 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:33 Greentellon wrote: My default APM is around 60, and I have won players who had triple of that. I can do 400APM with spam but that doesn't make any of it useful. Do you play on professional level? | ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
On January 18 2011 18:33 Greentellon wrote: My default APM is around 60, and I have won players who had triple of that. I can do 400APM with spam but that doesn't make any of it useful. At GSL level, even code A, having less than 150 APM is a crutch. | ||
| ||
