|
On January 12 2011 20:32 KahunaNui wrote: Errr, why did he GG so soon? Was it that lost? Seriously and newbiely asking
He'd just floated his barracks to the middle of the map and there were now lings there to kill them. Either they die or he floats them all the way back and NesTea just kills him anyway. It was over.
|
i went for a piss, comes back and its over ? wtf happened can someone recap it
|
On January 12 2011 20:32 KahunaNui wrote: Errr, why did he GG so soon? Was it that lost? Seriously and newbiely asking Yes. He coulda landed the two at the top and finished the wall below
|
btw he gged because he had no wall in at his main(sent rax down to middle) and like 15 speedlings were still alive
|
On January 12 2011 20:32 KahunaNui wrote: Errr, why did he GG so soon? Was it that lost? Seriously and newbiely asking Nestea could have ran his Zerglings into Boxer's base and killed most of his SCV's.
There was no way for Boxer to win.
|
On January 12 2011 20:32 MrCon wrote: Boxer didn't even try to micro his marines >< And Nestea doing a pool first for the first time ever, wtf, does he have a partner in the crowd or what. Well you cant really micro non-stimmed rines vs slings
|
whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy T_T
|
Because when boxer all ins and cheeses its not considered an all in that failed... its considered brilliant plan that would have won him the game. pfft double standards much everyone?
|
was a match that could have gone either way. was literally a split second in it.
would love to have seen where boxer was going with that, but can't blame nestea for winning it
|
Boxer late by a second. *Sadface.
|
|
On January 12 2011 20:34 Cite wrote: Because when boxer all ins and cheeses its not considered an all in that failed... its considered brilliant plan that would have won him the game. pfft double standards much everyone?
Yes, it's a double-standard. It's called being a fan.
|
On January 12 2011 20:33 SenorChang wrote: boxer going for the innovative play, alot of ppl being critical because it failed, simply because nestea is a great player, against another zerg that may have been amazing.
the way i see it having lost the overlord and seen the pressure coming another zerg woulda tried to prepare himself and defend but nestea went straight out
great decision making
He was defending.
Running around with speedlings to scout and kill off reinforcements is standard, he saw the hole in the wall and went in.
|
Damn boxer >< showing some awesome play this GSL, the orbitals in round 1, the defensive nuke against tester which you don't see often enough. So close on those barracks ><
anyway... how good is Nesteas ZvP Nestea V MvP Finals possible? IMO that's what should happen, easily best 2 players currently.
|
On January 12 2011 20:34 Cite wrote: Because when boxer all ins and cheeses its not considered an all in that failed... its considered brilliant plan that would have won him the game. pfft double standards much everyone?
I think what he done is way different than your standard proxy 2 racks
Innovative play should be rewarded
|
Haha...if those lings had been half a second later Boxer would have landed it and people would have called it genius.
|
Oh man so close, dammit boxer is out data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
On January 12 2011 20:32 KahunaNui wrote: Errr, why did he GG so soon? Was it that lost? Seriously and newbiely asking I think with the lings there having killed off his marines, they can easily pick off the marines as they are produced. Rally more lings, keep preventing the wall off. No hope. Poor boxer. Grats to NesTea.
|
Say what you will about his play, Boxer is a tactical genius.
|
On January 12 2011 20:34 Cite wrote: Because when boxer all ins and cheeses its not considered an all in that failed... its considered brilliant plan that would have won him the game. pfft double standards much everyone? Well it wasn't really allin, I'm sure he'd do a macro game, atleast expand 1 when that wall was done. He just needed to wallin somewhere, obviously since his ramp wasn't
|
On January 12 2011 20:34 Cite wrote: Because when boxer all ins and cheeses its not considered an all in that failed... its considered brilliant plan that would have won him the game. pfft double standards much everyone?
haven't seen anything like what he tried yet
so yes, it's new, it's cool
|
|
|
|