|
On January 07 2011 21:43 sleepingdog wrote:
Wow the commentary is extremely bad today, Tastosis are cracking terrible, unfunny jokes the whole time and don't seem to bother at all to talk about the game, strategies, or anything remotely related to SC2 - what the hell is wrong with them?
Proof that no matter what someone will complain.
|
Wow..those FFs were nice.
|
Would tank really be that bad to get right now? I really think Inca could take this...
|
On January 07 2011 21:39 timmyfred wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2011 21:38 shaunnn wrote:
Doing a maths degree and ive literally never heard of greater infinity rofl, pretty sure thats complete bs I have a math degree, and have also never heard of it. Why? Because the concept of infinity literally doesn't allow for anything greater than it.
Na it has to do with the fact there is infinite integers, but between every integer there is infinite real numbers, so essentially there is always more real numbers than integers even though there are infinite integers, its complete abstraction and more logic/philosphy than maths
|
Nada taking so many bases, this is what I like to see.
|
|
|
On January 07 2011 21:43 sleepingdog wrote:
Wow the commentary is extremely bad today, Tastosis are cracking terrible, unfunny jokes the whole time and don't seem to bother at all to talk about the game, strategies, or anything remotely related to SC2 - what the hell is wrong with them?
I disagree 100% with this, the commentary has been golden today
Most people watch this to be entertained, not to hear the same rhetoric about strats and how important it is to do X etc.
|
Initial games:
G1: #1 in points vs #3 in points.
G2: #2 in points vs #4 in points.
G3: winner of G1 vs loser of G2.
G4: winner of G2 vs loser of G1.
After that the following three scenarios can happen:
1. Two players at 2-0 (both will advance), and two at 0-2 (does not advance).
The two players at 2-0 will play to determine 1st and 2nd spot. The two at 0-2 will play to determine 3rd and 4th.
2. One player at 2-0 (will advance as 1st).
One at 0-2 (will not advance, 4th)
Two players at 1-1. These will play to determine 2nd and 3rd. The winner advances.
[This is what happened today]
3. All 4 players at 1-1. The players that hasn't faced off will play. The two with 2-1 will advance, with the player that won over the other goes as 1st.
The two with 1-2 will not advance, with the one who won over the other goes as 3rd place.
Don't ask me why it's this way, ask Gom :p
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On January 07 2011 21:43 sleepingdog wrote:
Wow the commentary is extremely bad today, Tastosis are cracking terrible, unfunny jokes the whole time and don't seem to bother at all to talk about the game, strategies, or anything remotely related to SC2 - what the hell is wrong with them?
Just different taste in humour i guess.
|
A:He even has a Ghost!
T:Thats a creepy strategy!
GOLD!
|
|
|
On January 07 2011 21:46 SushilS wrote:
A:He even has a Ghost!
T:Thats a creepy strategy!
GOLD!
i laughed too!
gg nada dominates
|
|
|
That is the Nada we know and love.
|
inca played terrible both games.
|
There we go, Good Job Nada and I'm glad he was able to advance
|
Inca tries to attack out into a titanic T concave. NOPE.
Nada advances, well played!
|
Poll: Would you recommend Set 5 oGsNaDa VS oGsInCa ?Yes (73) 68% If you have time (20) 19% No (15) 14% 108 total votes Your vote: Would you recommend Set 5 oGsNaDa VS oGsInCa ? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
