EPTdamn
[GSL] S3 Qualifiers D2 - Page 273
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Sajiki
Germany522 Posts
damn | ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On November 16 2010 23:13 dtz wrote: i think at least march gotta suck for huk that he practically has 3 months before he can try to prove himself again. If anyone will do it, I believe in Huk. Guy is determined as hell. | ||
|
FLuE
United States1012 Posts
Oh, I was wondering why there's so many Zergs. Set 1 : Xel’Naga Caverns Set 2 : Metalopolis Set 3 : Scrap Station Scrap Station was in the map pool last GSL qualifier as well. | ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
You balance games around the idea that anyone has an equal chance of winning. How skillfull players are in comparison can never be determined objectively. Race distribution: Terran : 39.5% Protoss : 33% Zerg : 23.9% Random : 3.6% Qualified: Terran: 37.5 % Protoss: 18.75 % Zerg: 42.2 % Random: 1.55 % Only 23.9% of players participating in qualifiers players were Zerg, after qualifiers 42.2% of the players remaining were Zerg. You don't have to be an expert in statistics to see that this is well out of the margin of error. | ||
|
Sneddo
United States277 Posts
On November 16 2010 23:15 FLuE wrote: Scrap Station was in the map pool last GSL qualifier as well. GSL 2 qualifier was before the patch. I'm sad to see Tester not make it  That really bums be out... | ||
|
dtz
5834 Posts
Although it has to be noted that there has been 2 patches after that and people discover new things and improve over the 2 seasons so what was/was not balanced 2 months ago might not be the same now. | ||
|
Steel
Japan2283 Posts
I am very sad for huk, keep practicing man! | ||
|
Esp1noza
Russian Federation481 Posts
On November 16 2010 23:17 Saechiis wrote: Race distribution: Terran : 39.5% Protoss : 33% Zerg : 23.9% Random : 3.6% Qualified: Terran: 37.5 % Protoss: 18.75 % Zerg: 42.2 % Random: 1.55 % Zerg, Protoss, Terran... Talk about random! From 3.6% to 1.55% - worst results, even worse then toss, Blizzard please fix random! | ||
|
~GhoSt
145 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + TESTER, NADA, WHAT HAPPENED?!?!?!?!?!?! | ||
|
Furycrab
Canada456 Posts
| ||
|
Acecool
Korea (South)14 Posts
| ||
|
Nobu
Spain550 Posts
Anyways, hope to see more Protoss in the next GSL and less terrans  (Zerg FIGHTING!) | ||
|
Morale
Sweden1010 Posts
| ||
|
MDMA_
Canada265 Posts
so sad not enough protoss to watch that patch really screwed up some toss good | ||
|
Dromar
United States2145 Posts
Zergbong, Cool, Ret, Sen, Idra, Foxer, Boxer, MVP, July! Seems a little light on toss though. | ||
|
disco
Netherlands1667 Posts
| ||
|
Furycrab
Canada456 Posts
On November 16 2010 23:26 Nobu wrote: Did anyone take into consideration the ammount of "notable" protoss in the qualifiers? I wont say x race is OP or UP, but that numbers dont say anything, there was so many "skilled" zergs against a lot of unknown protoss, and the didnt make it today lost to in my opinion better player (Based in results and performance, i just follow GSL, so is my only way of comparing skills). Anyways, hope to see more Protoss in the next GSL and less terrans (Zerg FIGHTING!)I don't think it's the amount that's wrong, the problem I think was the qualifier pool. As Zerg you just have to practice Xel Naga which is a fairly balanced map, and regardless of how Metal went you had Scrap Station to fall on... Which TvZ I'm still of very mixed opinion... but PvZ... Looks pretty bad. | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10301 Posts
lol Tester, wth | ||
|
schiznak
Australia258 Posts
On November 16 2010 23:17 Saechiis wrote: You balance games around the idea that anyone has an equal chance of winning. How skillfull players are in comparison can never be determined objectively. Race distribution: Terran : 39.5% Protoss : 33% Zerg : 23.9% Random : 3.6% Qualified: Terran: 37.5 % Protoss: 18.75 % Zerg: 42.2 % Random: 1.55 % Only 23.9% of players participating in qualifiers players were Zerg, after qualifiers 42.2% of the players remaining were Zerg. You don't have to be an expert in statistics to see that this is well out of the margin of error. You don't have to be an expert in statistics to see that the sample size is so small that it is well within the margin of error. | ||
|
neoenigma
United States243 Posts
| ||
| ||
