EPTDreamHack SteelSeries Lan Tournament - Page 118
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
labbe
Sweden1456 Posts
| ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On November 26 2010 20:29 HyTemplar wrote: ok Socke and Naama are further in the tournament. Although i think these 2 are the better players i feel sorry for Bischu tho..  totally sucks... Agree with you, Naama has beaten Bischu consistently (not only today but also in the tournament from SK recently) and a PvP can always go either way....I think it is a pretty acceptable result that the loser of the PvP advances and not the loser of the PvT | ||
|
Wassow
United Kingdom32 Posts
| ||
|
AntiGrav1ty
Germany2310 Posts
| ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
On November 26 2010 20:33 sleepingdog wrote: Agree with you, Naama has beaten Bischu consistently (not only today but also in the tournament from SK recently) and a PvP can always go either way....I think it is a pretty acceptable result that the loser of the PvP advances and not the loser of the PvT That's bullshit really. What matters are the results of today and all 3 players equally deserved their spots. | ||
|
vonPluring
Sweden96 Posts
On November 26 2010 20:33 sleepingdog wrote: Agree with you, Naama has beaten Bischu consistently (not only today but also in the tournament from SK recently) and a PvP can always go either way....I think it is a pretty acceptable result that the loser of the PvP advances and not the loser of the PvT i've seen bischu destroy morrow when he played terran at the top of his game so i really dont agree.. he could have gone really far imo, really sad to see this | ||
|
labbe
Sweden1456 Posts
On November 26 2010 20:33 sleepingdog wrote: Agree with you, Naama has beaten Bischu consistently (not only today but also in the tournament from SK recently) and a PvP can always go either way....I think it is a pretty acceptable result that the loser of the PvP advances and not the loser of the PvT What? So winning a TvP is worth more than winning a PvP? | ||
|
Psyclon
Bulgaria2443 Posts
| ||
|
ParasitJonte
Sweden1768 Posts
| ||
|
thezergk
United States492 Posts
| ||
|
ParasitJonte
Sweden1768 Posts
On November 26 2010 20:36 Psyclon wrote: Is this decision final? I don't want to be in Bischu's shoes, this will keep him pissed for weeks, probably. Probably a thing you won't ever forget actually. | ||
|
defuzas
248 Posts
 | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On November 26 2010 20:36 labbe wrote: What? So winning a TvP is worth more than winning a PvP? In my opinion? Definitely yes. PvP is a screwed match-up that often ends up in a build-order win. Also wtf stop giving me shit for my opinion? I don't have nothing against Bischu, in fact I like his one gate stargate void ray harass into early expand very much. But in my opinion does losing two consecutive PvTs say more about someone's performance than losing two consecutive PvPs. | ||
|
HyTemplar
Germany265 Posts
will the next group being casted by day9 again? | ||
|
labbe
Sweden1456 Posts
| ||
|
Ippo
708 Posts
| ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
|
BeMannerDuPenner
Germany5638 Posts
On November 26 2010 20:34 AntiGrav1ty wrote: Bischu must be raging. He played well in this tournament and now he just got eliminated by a coin? Even tho i liked Socke and Naama to advance this is so ridiculous... this... the best and most known players advance thats good. but crappy bo1 system that even ends in a freakin coinflip is the most ridiculous groupstage ever poor guy | ||
|
HyTemplar
Germany265 Posts
| ||
|
sodapop
Sweden189 Posts
On November 26 2010 20:38 Numy wrote: Dreamhack showing once again how awesome their rules are. Hopefully they fix their stupidness next time and have bo3 group stages. The chances of tiebreakers then are so min where as now they are so high. Isn't this wrong? The only way a bo3 setup would be better if they actually play out all three games regardless of the results in the first two, right? (because if they would end 2-0 it would be the exact same outcome as we had today.) I have to admit that it was a while ago I took statistics, but wouldn't this mean the probability would be the same too? (actually I have a feeling I might be wrong) Unless you mean that a bo3 setup changes the way the players play, and that this would give a benefit to either side. This might be true. | ||
| ||
