EPT[Day1] IEM New York - Live report thread. - Page 44
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Burn2Memory
United States574 Posts
| ||
|
Sramota
Sweden183 Posts
"SCV's get there just in time but not enough..." WHAT?! | ||
|
Pudge_172
United States1378 Posts
| ||
|
Alaz
108 Posts
les go murder | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9011 Posts
| ||
|
Ascorius
Norway275 Posts
On October 09 2010 02:35 out4blood wrote: LOLWUT? How about you back up your ludicrous statistics. If IdrA was really 10x better he would not have lost a bo3 series. If you want to use statistics you can use IdrA's accomplishments in SC2 to compare them. SC2 is a very new game and the balance isnt really there yet (because the metagame development hasnt gotten that far and because of the actual mechanics), so a far worse player can win in a bo3 against a better player. If you disagree you can listen to the last State of the game podcast were they state the same fact. But to be honest... the 10x statement might have been a "tad" too bold from me, it was more of a way a "thing you say". Let me retract my statement and say that IdrA is "way better". | ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
On October 09 2010 02:40 AssuredVacancy wrote: this is 2010 and yet we can't get a smooth connection between 2 computers a few feet away. Yeah lets just take a moment, sit back and let that sink in for a bit.... ... Good job Blizzard. Battle net 0.2 Indeed. | ||
|
out4blood
United States313 Posts
On October 09 2010 02:40 AssuredVacancy wrote: this is 2010 and yet we can't get a smooth connection between 2 computers a few feet away. You can. But with SC2 you have to also have a smooth connection to b.net. That's where the lag is coming in. | ||
|
motherrussia
United States24 Posts
| ||
|
Ascorius
Norway275 Posts
On October 09 2010 02:39 Raevin wrote: Yes, thanks for proving to us how IdrA is 10x times better than these players, despite losing to one of the players in a BO3 series Enjoy the games "mate" You seem to forget that the real argument we had was that we were discussing the level of play in this tournament compared to GSL. Grats for trying to derail the argument to avoid discussing what you were wrong about... and grats for not being man enough to admit you were wrong. | ||
|
pRo9aMeR
595 Posts
 | ||
|
Martylang
Netherlands40 Posts
tried this one? lag free for me. http://tv.esl.eu/de/esltv_edge_free/ | ||
|
DoA
Korea (South)599 Posts
| ||
|
Sramota
Sweden183 Posts
| ||
|
pyro19
6575 Posts
| ||
|
motherrussia
United States24 Posts
| ||
|
out4blood
United States313 Posts
On October 09 2010 02:45 Ascorius wrote: You seem to forget that the real argument we had was that we were discussing the level of play in this tournament compared to GSL. Grats for trying to derail the argument to avoid discussing what you were wrong about... and grats for not being man enough to admit you were wrong. GSL was an Open tournament with 2000 players where what WE saw was after 5 rounds of preliminaries. NY ESL is invitational with only 8 players. So you don't get the new up and comers. But you forget that there was some very bad play in the GSL. It was just overshadowed because there were so many good epic games. | ||
|
d3frag
United States3 Posts
| ||
|
flk0s
54 Posts
Stop criticising and start enjoying the games | ||
|
SiguR
Canada2039 Posts
| ||
| ||
